Jungles: A new solution to the host/parasite phylogeny reconciliation problem

Mathematical Biosciences

Volumn 149, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 191-223

  Charleston, M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Jungle; Phylogeny reconciliation; Systematics

Indexed keywords

HOST-PARASITE RELATIONSHIP; MODELLING; PHYLOGENY;

ARTICLE; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; LOUSE; MAMMAL; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; LICE INFESTATIONS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALLOPHAGA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; RODENT DISEASES; RODENTIA;

GEOMYIDAE; MAMMALIA; PHTHIRAPTERA;

EID: 0031811061     PISSN: 00255564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0025-5564(97)10012-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hafner M.S., Nadler S.A. Phylogenetic trees support the coevolution of parasites and their hosts. Nature. 332:1988;258.
2. Brooks D.R. Hennig's parasitological method: A proposed solution. System. Zool. 30:1981;229.
3. Mirkin B., Muchnik I., Smith T. A biologically consistent model for comparing molecular phylogenies. J. Comput. Biol. 2:1995;493-507.
4. Page R.D.M. Parallel phylogenies: Reconstructing the history of host-parasite assemblages. Cladistics. 10:1994;155.
5. ®Windows™
6. ®. Availability: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treemap.html.
7. Page R.D.M. Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes, organisms, and areas. System. Biol. 43:1994;58.
8. Ronquist F. Reconstructing the history of host-parasite associations using generalised parsimony. Cladistics. 11:1995;73.
9. Clark J.B., Maddison W.P., Kidwell M.G. Phylogenetic analysis supports horizontal transfer of p transposable elements. Molec. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;40.
10. Delwiche C.F., Palmer J.D. Rampant horizontal transfer and duplication of rubisco genes in eubacteria and plastids. Molec. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;873.
11. E.J. Borowski, J.M. Borwein, Dictionary of Mathematics, Collins, Glasgow, 1989.
12. Page R.D.M. Genes, organisms, and areas: The problem of multiple lineages. System. Biol. 42:1993;77.
13. J.S. Farris, Hennig86, version 1.5. Computer program and documentation, Port Jefferson Station, New York, 1988.
14. D.L. Swofford, Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (PAUP), version 3.0 (1993).
15. F. Harary, Graph Theory, Addison-Welsey Series in Mathematics, 1969.
16. C.J. Humphries, J.M. Cox, E.S. Nielsen, Nothofagus and its parasites: A cladistic approach to coevolution, in: A.R. Stone, D.L. Hawksworth (Eds.), Coevolution and Systematics, Clarendon, Oxford, 1986, p. 77.
17. Bandelt H.-J., Dress A. Split decomposition: A new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Molec. Phylogen. and Evol. 1(3):1992;242.
18. Page R.D.M. Temporal congruence revisited: Comparison of mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence in cospeciating pocket gophers and their chewing lice. System. Biol. 45:1996;151.
19. Maddison W.P. Reconstructing character evolution on polytomous cladograms. Cladistics. 5:1989;365.
20. Huelsenbeck J.P., Rannala B., Yang Z. Statistical tests of host-parasite cospeciation. Evolution. 51(2):1997;410.