The accuracy of the Goldberg method for classifying misreporters of energy intake on a food frequency questionnaire and 24-h recalls: Comparison with doubly labeled water

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 569-576

  Tooze, J A ^a   Krebs Smith, S M ^b   Troiano, R P ^b   Subar, A F ^b  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

diet; diet surveys; energy intake; questionnaires standards; research design; statistical bias

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; DOUBLY LABELED WATER; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; FEMALE; FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE; GOLDBERG METHOD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; NUTRITIONAL PARAMETERS; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; DIET; DIET RECORDS; ENERGY INTAKE; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SELF REPORT; WATER;

EID: 84860615403     PISSN: 09543007     EISSN: 14765640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.198     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Black AE (2000a). Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: Basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 1119-1130.
2. Black AE (2000). The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cutoff for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 395-404.
3. Black AE, Goldberg GR, Jebb SA, Livingstone MB, Cole TJ, Prentice AM (1991). Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 45, 583-599.
4. Conway JM, Ingwersen LA, Moshfegh AJ (2004). Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: An observational validation study. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 595-603.
5. Conway JM, Ingwersen LA, Vinyard BT, Moshfegh AJ (2003). Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple- pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 1171-1178.
6. Crowne DP, Marlowe D (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Pyschol 24, 349-354.
7. Drummond SE, Crombie NE, Cursiter MC, Kirk TR (1998). Evidence that eating frequency is inversely related to body weight status in male, but not female, non-obese adults reporting valid dietary intakes. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22, 105-112.
8. Fischer DG, Fick C (1993). Measuring social desirability-short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale. Educ Psychol Meas 53, 417-424.
9. Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, CowardWA et al (1991). Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr 45, 569-581.
10. Hill RJ, Davies PS (2001). The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique. Br J Nutr 85, 415-430.
11. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000). Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc: New York, NY, USA.
12. Huang TTK, Roberts SB, Howarth NC, McCrory MA (2005). Effect of screening out implausible energy intake reports on relationships between diet and BMI. Obesity Res 13, 1205-1217.
13. Kipnis V, Subar AF, Midthune D, Freedman LS, Ballard-Barbash R, Troiano R et al. (2003). The structure of dietary measurement error: Results of the OPEN biomarker study. Am J Epidemiol 158, 14-21.
14. Leary MR (1983). A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 9, 371-375.
15. Livingstone MB, Black AE (2003). Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr 133 (Suppl 3), 895S-920S.
16. Livingstone MB, Robson PJ, Black AE, Coward WA, Wallace JM, McKinley MC et al (2003). An evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of energy expenditure measured by heart rate and the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: Basal metabolic rate for identifying mis-reporting of energy intake by adults and children: A retrospective analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 455-463.
17. Macdiarmid J, Blundell J (1998). Assessing dietary intake: Who, what and why of under-reporting. Nutr Res Rev 11, 231-253.
18. Moshfegh AJ, Rhodes DG, Baer DJ, Murayi T, Clemens JC, Rumpler WV et al (2008). The US department of agriculture automated multiple-pass method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 324-332.
19. Racette SB, Schoeller DA, Luke AH, Shay K, Hnilicka J, Kushner RF (1994). Relative dilution spaces of 2H- and 18O-labeled water in humans. Am J Physiol 267, E585-E590.
20. Schoeller DA (1992). Isotope Dilution Methods. In: Björntorp P, Brodoff BN (eds). Obesity. JB Lippincott Co: New York, NY, USA, pp 80-88.
21. Schofield WN (1985). Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 39 (Suppl 1), 5-41.
22. Strahan R, Gerbasi K (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. J Clin Psychol 28, 191-193.
23. Stunkard AJ, Messick S (1985). The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 29, 71-83.
24. Stunkard AJ, Sorensen T, Schulsinger F (1982). Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis 60, 115-120.
25. Subar AF, Kipnis V, Troiano RP, Midthune D, Schoeller DA, Bingham S et al (2003). Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: The OPEN study. Am J Epidemiol 158, 1-13.
26. Subar AF, Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Hurwitz P, McNutt S et al (2001). Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: The Eating at America's Table Study. Am J Epidemiol 154, 1089-1099.
27. Tooze JA, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Troiano R, Schatzkin A, Kipnis V (2004). Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 795-804.
28. Trabulsi J, Troiano RP, Subar AF, Sharbaugh C, Kipnis V, Schatzkin A et al (2003). Precision of the doubly labeled water method in a large-scale application: Evaluation of a streamlined-dosing protocol in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 1370-1377.
29. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mǎsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M (2008). Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40, 181-188.