Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: MRInvasive MRI pathological correlation following bilateral total mastectomy

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 367-375

  Stivalet, Aude ^a   Luciani, Alain ^a,b   Pigneur, Frederic ^a   Dao, Thu Ha ^a   Beaussart, Pauline ^a   Merabet, Zahira ^a   Perlbarg, Julie ^c   Meyblum, Evelyne ^a   Baranes, Laurence ^a   Calitchi, Elie ^a   Lepage, Christophe ^a   Belkacemi, Yazid ^a   Lagrange, Jean Leon ^a   Lantieri, Laurent ^a   Rahmouni, Alain ^a  

^a HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

^c ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Lobular neoplasm; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

BI-LATERAL MASTECTOMY; BI-RADS; BREAST MRI; BREAST NEOPLASM; CATEGORICAL VARIABLES; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; FISHER EXACT TEST; GOLD STANDARDS; HIGH SENSITIVITY; INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA; LOBULAR NEOPLASM; MEAN DIAMETER; MRI IMAGE; MULTIFOCAL; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; REFERENCE STANDARD;

CHARACTERIZATION; DIAGNOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; TUMORS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER INVASION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMAPLASTY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SIMPLE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84860607281     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.110477     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Del Frate C, Borghese L, Cedolini C, et al. Role of pre-surgical breast MRI in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. Breast 2007;16:469-81 (Pubitemid 47491604)
2. Caramella T, Chapellier C, Ettore F, et al. Value of MRI in the surgical planning of invasive lobular breast carcinoma: a prospective and a retrospective study of 57 cases: comparison with physical examination, conventional imaging, and histology. Clin Imaging 2007;31:155-61 (Pubitemid 46601797)
3. Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG, et al. MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;107:1-14 (Pubitemid 350179588)
4. Cocquyt V, Van Belle S. Lobular carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular cancer of the breast. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005;17:55-60 (Pubitemid 40315265)
5. Fabre Demard N, Boulet P, Prat X, et al. Breast MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma: diagnosis and staging. J Radiol 2005;86:1027-34 (Pubitemid 41232754)
6. Lopez JK, Bassett LW. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: spectrum of mammographic, US, and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 2009;29:165-76
7. Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 1991;178:149-54
8. Paumier A, Sagan C, Campion L, et al. Accuracy of conservative treatment for infiltrating lobular breast cancer: a retrospective study of 217 infiltrating lobular carcinomas and 2155 infiltrating ductal carcinomas. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2003;32: 529-34 (Pubitemid 37309651)
9. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:901-10 (Pubitemid 36363023)
10. Rodenko GN, Harms SE, Pruneda JM, et al. MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1415-9 (Pubitemid 26418723)
11. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:333-41 (Pubitemid 36135009)
12. Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T, et al. The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;119:415-22
13. Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:32-7 (Pubitemid 36181775)
14. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions. Radiology 2007;243:670-80 (Pubitemid 46799419)
15. Brem RF, Lechner MC, Jackman RJ, et al. Lobular neoplasia at percutaneous breast biopsy: variables associated with carcinoma at surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:637-41 (Pubitemid 351304506)
16. Elsheikh TM, Silverman JF. Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ: a correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:534-43 (Pubitemid 40411188)
17. Foster MC, Helvie MA, Gregory NE, et al. Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary? Radiology 2004;231:813-19 (Pubitemid 38668103)
18. Giuliano AE, Boolbol S, Degnim A, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology: position statement on prophylactic mastectomy. Approved by the Society of Surgical Oncology Executive Council, March 2007. Ann Surg Onco 2007;14:2425-7 (Pubitemid 47389578)
19. Goldflam K, Hunt KK, Gershenwald JE, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Predictors of significant histologic findings. Cancer 2004;101:1977-86 (Pubitemid 39425372)
20. Fitzgibbons PL, Connolly JL, Page DL. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas of the breast. Cancer Committee. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:1026-33 (Pubitemid 30602045)
21. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: ACR, 2003
22. Morris EA. Illustrated breast MR lexicon. Semin Roentgenol 2001;36:238-49 (Pubitemid 32701399)
23. Tardivon AA, Athanasiou A, Thibault F, et al. Breast imaging and reporting data system (BIRADS): magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2007;61:212-5 (Pubitemid 46096699)
24. Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2003;98:468-73 (Pubitemid 36885985)
25. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004;233:830-49
26. Kim SJ, Morris EA, Liberman L, et al. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses. Am J Roentgenol 2001;177: 551-7 (Pubitemid 32802337)
27. Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, et al. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1658-63
28. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:35-43 (Pubitemid 30415534)
29. Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J 2006;12:331-7 (Pubitemid 43989977)
30. Menes TS, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss I, et al. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:881-5 (Pubitemid 41504220)
31. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007;244:356-78 (Pubitemid 47080868)