Role of pre-surgical breast MRI in the management of invasive breast carcinoma

Breast

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 469-481

  Del Frate, Chiara ^a   Borghese, Ludovica ^a   Cedolini, Carla ^a   Bestagno, Alexia ^a   Puglisi, Fabio ^a   Isola, Miriam ^b   Soldano, Franca ^b   Bazzocchi, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast magnetic resonance imaging; Clinical management; Invasive breast carcinoma

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER INVASION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 34848862761     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Heywang S.H., Hahn D., Schmidt H., et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10 (1986) 199-204
2. Boné B., Péntek Z., Perbeck L., and Veress B. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions. Acta Radiol 38 (1997) 489-496
3. Stomper P.C., Winston J.S., Herman S., Klippenstein D.L., Arredondo M.A., and Blumenson L.E. Angiogenesis and dynamic MR imaging gadolinium enhancement of malignant and benign breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 45 (1997) 39-46
4. Boetes C., Barentsz J.O., Mus R.D., et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 193 (1994) 777-781
5. Heiberg E.V., Perman W.H., Hermann V.M., and Janney C.G. Dynamic sequential 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the whole breast. Magn Reson Imag 14 (1996) 337-348
6. Heywang S.H., Wolf A., Pruss E., et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 171 (1989) 95-103
7. Kaiser W.A., and Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA-Preliminary observations. Radiology 170 (1989) 681-686
8. Harms S.E., Flamig D.P., Hesley K.L., et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187 (1993) 493-501
9. Gilles R., Guinebretiere J.M., Lucidarme O., et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191 (1994) 625-631
10. Stomper P.C., Herman S., Klippenstein D.L., et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 197 (1995) 387-395
11. Orel S.G., Schnall M.D., Powell C.M., et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196 (1995) 115-122
12. Homer M.J. Mammographic interpretation: a practical approach (1991), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
13. Müller-Schimpfle M., Stoll P., Stern W., Kurz S., Dammann F., and Claussen C.D. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?. Am J Roentgenol 168 (1997) 1323-1329
14. Heywang-Köbrunner S.H., Viehweg P., Heinig A., and Küchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24 (1997) 94-108
15. Boetes C., Mus R.D.M., Holland R., et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197 (1995) 743-747
16. Berg W.A., Gutierrez L., NessAiver M.S., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233 (2004) 830-849
17. Sardanelli F., Giuseppetti G.M., Panizza P., et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 1149-1157
18. Fischer U., Kopka L., and Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213 (1999) 881-888
19. Mumtaz H., Hall-Craggs M.A., Davidson T., et al. Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 169 (1997) 417-424
20. Rieber A., Merkle E., Böhm W., Brambs H.-J., and Tomczak R. MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21 (1997) 773-779
21. Londero V., Bazzocchi M., Del Frate C., et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: comparison of mammography, sonography and MR imaging in evaluation of residual disease in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 14 8 (2004) 1371-1379
22. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 (1999) 101-110
23. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8 (1999) 135-160
24. Hlawatsch A., Teifke A., Schmidt M., and Thelen M. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 1493-1501
25. Spilsbury K., Semmens J.B., Saunders C.M., et al. Subsequent surgery after initial breast conserving surgery: a population based study. ANZ J Surg 75 5 (2005) 260-264
26. Fleming F.J., Hill A.D., Mc Dermott E.W., et al. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 30 3 (2004) 233-237
27. Miller A.R., Brandao G., Prihoda T.J., et al. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol 86 (2004) 134-140
28. Keskek M., Kothari M., Ardehali B., et al. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30 10 (2004) 1058-1064
29. Cellini C., Hollenbeck S.T., Christos P., et al. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 11 10 (2004) 915-920
30. Harris E.E., Schultz D.J., Jones H.A., et al. Factors associated with residual disease on re-excision in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer J 9 1 (2003) 42-48
31. Tartter P.I., Kaplan J., Bliweiss I., et al. Lumpectomy margins reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 179 2 (2000) 81-85
32. Obedian E., and Haffty B.G. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. Cancer J Sci Am 6 1 (2000) 28-33
33. Malik H.Z., George W.D., Mallon E.A., et al. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 25 5 (1999) 464-469
34. Malik H.Z., Purushotam A.D., Mallon E.A., et al. Influence of tumour bed assessment on local recurrence following breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 25 3 (1999) 265-268
35. Liberman L., and Morris E.A. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 180 (2003) 901-910
36. Liberman L., and Morris E.A. MR imaging findings in the controlateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 180 (2003) 333-341
37. Orel S.G., and Schnall M.D. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220 1 (2001) 13-30
38. Fisher E.R., Anderson S., Tan-Chiu E., Fisher B., Eaton L., and Wolmark N. Fifteen-year prognostic discriminants for invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 91 (2001) 1679-1687
39. Li C.I., Anderson B.O., Daling J.R., and Moe R.E. Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. JAMA 289 (2003) 1421-1424
40. Broet P., de la Rochefordiere A., Scholl S.M., et al. Contralateral breast cancer: annual incidence and risk parameters. J Clin Oncol 13 (1995) 1578-1583
41. Bartelink H., Horiot J.C., and Poortmans P. Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med 345 (2001) 1378-1387
42. Fisher B., Dignam J., Wolmark N., et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol 16 (1998) 441-452
43. Kurtz J.M., Spitalier J.M., Amalric R., et al. The prognostic significance of late local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18 (1990) 87-93
44. Hungness E.S., Safa M., Shaughnessy E.A., et al. Bilateral synchronous breast cancer: mode of detection and comparison of histologic features between the 2 breasts. Surgery 128 (2000) 702-707
45. Healey E.A., Cook E.F., Orav E.J., Schnitt S.J., Connolly J.L., and Harris J.R. Contralateral breast cancer: clinical characteristics and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol 11 (1993) 1545-1552
46. Moon W.K., Noh D.Y., and Im J.G. Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology 224 (2002) 569-576
47. Lee S.G., Orel S.G., Woo I.J., et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 226 (2003) 773-778
48. Tillman G.F., Orel S.G., Schnall M.D., et al. Effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the clinical management of women with early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20 (2002) 3413-3423
49. Kneeshaw P.J., Turnbull L.W., et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 29 (2003) 32-37
50. Furman B., Gardner M.S., et al. Effect of 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 186 (2003) 344-347
51. Gatzeimer W., Liersch T., et al. Preoperative MR mammography in breast carcinoma. Effect on operative treatment from the surgical viewpoint. Chirurg 70 (1999) 1460-1468
52. Tan J.E., Orel S.G., et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment. Am J Clin Oncol 22 (1999) 414-418
53. Zhang Y., Fukatsu H., et al. The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 9 (2002) 231-239