Scientific literacy for bringing in the outsiders

Exploring the Landscape of Scientific Literacy

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 193-204

  Brickhouse, Nancy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860552913     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203843284     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Allard, A. C., & Santoro, N. (2006). Troubling identities: Teacher education students’ construction of class and ethnicity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 115-129.
2. Ball, T. (2005). Gender bias in F.I.R.S.T. robotics competitions. In C. Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference(pp. 3626-3630). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
3. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. National Research Council Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Boyer, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Learning and teaching as emergent features of informal settings: An ethnographic study of an environmental action group. Science Education, 90, 1028-1049.
5. Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: Reshaping the sciences of the future. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 401-416.
6. Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(3), 282-295.
7. Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965-980.
8. Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68-103.
9. Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392-414.
10. Cassell, J., & Jenkins, H. (1998). From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: gender and computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science,12, 258-261.
12. Davis, K. S. (2001). “Peripheral and subversive”: Women making connections and challenging the boundaries of the science community. Science Education, 85(4), 368-409.
13. Engineering Workforce Commission (2007). Engineering and technology enrollments: 2006. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Ford, D. J., Brickhouse, N. W., Lottero-Perdue, P. S., & Kittleson, J. M. (2006). Elementary girls’ science reading at home and school. Science Education, 90(2), 270-288.
15. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2002). School’s out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ interest, experience, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180-192.
17. Kahle J. B., & Lakes, M. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 131-140.
18. Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook for research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
19. Kurth, L. A., Anderson, C. W., & Palincsar, A. S. (2002). The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helping All students to understand science. Science Education, 86, 287-313.
20. Lemke, J. (2004). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296-316.
21. Lottero-Perdue, P. S. (2005). Critical analysis of science-related texts in a breastfeeding information, support, and advocacy community of practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Delaware.
22. Moje, E. B., Tucker-Raymond, E., Varelas, M., & Pappas, C. (2007). Forum: Giving oneself over to science: Exploring the roles of subjectivities and identities in learning science. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 1(3), 593-601.
23. National Assessment of Educational Progress [NAEP]. (2005). The Nation’s report card: Science 2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
24. National Science Foundation. (2007). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. (NSF 07-315). Arlington, VA: Author.
25. Page, R. (1999). The uncertain value of science knowledge: Biology at Westridge High. Teachers College Record, 100, 554-601.
26. Resnick, L. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher,16, 13-20, 54.
27. Scantlebury, K., & Baker, D. (2007). Gender issues in science education research: Remembering where the difference lies. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science teaching(pp. 257-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Schultz, K. (1999). Identity narratives: Stories from the lives of urban adolescent females. Urban Review, 31, 79-106.
29. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. H. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30. Sjøberg, S. (2007). Challenges for science education: A personal view. In C. Linder, L. Östman, & P-O Wickman (Eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
31. Tenenbaum, H. R., & Leaper, C. (2003). Parent-child conversations about science: Socialization of gender inequities. Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 34-47.
32. Tonso, K. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 1(2), 273-307.
33. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.