Body talk: Students' identity construction while discussing a socioscientific issue

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 279-305

  Ideland, Malin ^a   Malmberg, Claes ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Discourse analysis; Gender; Identity; Social class; Socioscientific issues; Subject position

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860548691     PISSN: 18711502     EISSN: 18711510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-012-9381-7     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Ambjörnsson, F. (2004). I en klass för sig: genus, klass och sexualitet bland gymnasietjejer. [In a class on their own: Gender, class and sexuality among girls in upper secondary school]. Stockholm: Ordfront.
3. Apple, M. W. (2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.
4. Archer, L. (2003). Race, masculinity and schooling. Muslim boys in education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
5. Arvola Orlander, A. (2011). Med kroppen som insats. Diskursiva spänningsfält i biologiundervisningen på högstadiet. [The body at stake: Discursive tensions in secondary school biology teaching]. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
6. Bäckman, M. (2007). Miljonsvennar i förorten. I: G. Arvastsson & B. Ehn (Eds.), Kulturnavigering i skolan. [Culture navigation in school]. Malmö: Gleerups.
7. Ball, S. J. (2004). Education for sale! The commodification of everything? King's annual education lecture, University of London, June 17, 2004. Retrieved on 25-05-2011 from http://sys. glotta. ntua. gr/Dialogos/Politics/CERU-0410-253-OWI. pdf.
8. Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class. The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
9. Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2005). Creativity as a cultural commodity: An ethnographic investigation of struggles over creativity in three Swedish schools. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 42 no 2. http://www. jceps. com/?pageID=article& articleID=46. Downloaded 29 June 2011.
10. Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of research in science teaching, 38, 282-295.
11. Brickhouse, N. W. (2011). Scientific literacy for bringing in the outsiders. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. McKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 193-204). London: Routledge.
12. Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89, 779-802.
13. Carlone, H. B. (2003). Innovative science within and against a culture of "achievement". Science Education, 87, 307-328.
14. Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls' access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392-414.
15. Danielsson, A. (2009). Doing physics-doing gender. An exploration of physics students' identity constitution in the context of laboratory work. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
16. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.
17. Ekborg, M., Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2009). Science for life-a conceptual framework for construction and analysis of socio-scientific cases. NorDiNa, 5, 35-46.
18. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19. Foucault, M. (1963/1993). Birth of the clinic. London: Routledge.
20. Foucault, M. (1969/2002). The archaeology of knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.
21. Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text. A poststructuralist reader (pp. 52-64). London: Routledge.
22. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and the power: An afterword by Michel Foucault. In H. Dreyfuss & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23. Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
24. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25. Hall, S. (1996). Who need 'identity'? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1-17). London: Sage.
26. Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. J. Jates (Eds.), Discourse, theory and practice: A reader (pp. 72-81). London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.
27. Hancock, A-M. (2007). Intersectionality as a normative and empirical paradigm. Politics and Gender, 3, 248-254.
28. Haraway, D. (2004). The Haraway reader. New York: Routledge.
29. Ideland, M., Malmberg, C., & Winberg, M. (2011). Culturally equipped for socio-scientific issues? A comparative study on how teachers and students in mono- and multiethnic schools handle work with complex issues. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1835-1859.
30. Kolstö, S. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tool for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socio-scientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.
31. Latour, B. (1998). From the world of science to the world of research? Science, 280, 208-209.
32. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296-316.
34. Levinson, R., Koulouris, P., & Turner, S. (2000). Constraints and challenges in teaching about the ethical dilemmas arising from developments in biomedical science. Paper presented at the BERA conference, Cardiff, 7th September, 2000.
35. Lindahl, B., Rosberg, M., Ekborg, M., Ideland, M., Malmberg, C., Rehn, A., et al. (2011). Socio-scientific issues-A way to improve students' interest and learning? Journal of US-China Education Review, 8.
36. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
37. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2002). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity press.
38. Nygren, G. (2007). Framgångsrika elever [Successful students]. In G. Arvastsson & B. Ehn (Eds.), Kulturnavigering i skolan. [Culture navigation in school] (pp. 111-117). Malmö: Gleerups.
39. Nyström, E. (2007). Talking and taking positions. An encounter between action research and the gendered and racialised discourses of school science. Umeå: Umeå University.
40. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What "ideas-about-science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720.
41. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Kings College.
42. Paechter, C. (2007). Being boys, being girls: Learning masculinities and femininities. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
43. Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95, 601-626.
44. Popkewitz, T. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and fabrications of the child. American Educational Journal, 41, 3-34.
45. Popkewitz, T. (2009a). Kosmopolitism i skolreformernas tidevarv. Vetenskap, utbildning och samhällsskapande genom konstruktionen av barnet. Stockholm: Liber.
46. Popkewitz, T. (2009b). Curriculum study, curriculum history, and curriculum theory: The reason of reason. Journal of Curriculum studies, 41, 301-319.
47. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
48. Ratcliffe, M., Bartholomew, H., Hames, V., Hind, A., Leach, J., Millar, R., et al. (2005). Evidence-based practice in science education: The researcher-user interface. Research Papers in Education, 20, 169-186.
49. Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
50. Roberts, D. A. (2011). Competing visions of scientific literacy. The influence of a science curriculum policy image. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. McKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 11-27). London: Routledge.
51. Sadler, T. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513-536.
52. Sadler, T. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45, 1-42.
53. Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth's identity construction-two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science curriculum (pp. 231-248). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
54. Sjøberg, S. (2011). Paradokser fra PISA: Hva gjör vi når PISA-resultatene er i konflikt med tendenser og anbefalinger i naturfagundervisning? Paper presented at NFSUN, Linköping 15th of June 2011.
55. Skolverket. (2006). Curriculum for the compulsory school system, the pre-school class and leisure-time center. Lpo94. Stockholm: Skolverket.
56. Skolverket. (2009). Syllabuses for the compulsory school. Stockholm: Skolverket.
57. Snyder, V. L., & Broadway, F. S. (2004). Queering high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 617-636.
58. Solomon, J. (2003). The UK and the movement for science, technology and society (STS) education. In R. Cross (Ed.), A vision for science education: Responding to the work of Peter Fensham (pp. 76-90). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
59. Wenger, E. (2008). Community of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour. Aldershot: Gower.
61. Younger, M., & Warrington, M. (2005). Raising boys' achievement. London: Department for Education and Skills.