Model performance analysis for Bayesian biomass dynamics models using bias, precision and reliability metrics

Fisheries Research

Volumn 125-126, Issue , 2012, Pages 173-183

  Ono, Kotaro ^a   Punt, André E ^a   Rivot, Etienne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Model performance; Octopus; OpenBUGS; State space model

Indexed keywords

OCTOPUS;

EID: 84860539513     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Box G.E.P., Tiao G.C. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis 1973, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Hoboken, New Jersey.
2. Buckland S.T., Newmann K.B., Fernández C., Thomas L., Harwood J. Embeding population dynamics models in inference. Stat. Sci. 2007, 22:44-58.
3. Chassot E., Balguerías E., Guitton J., Jouffre D., Tfeil B., Gascuel D. Diagnostic de l'état du stock de poulpe (Octopus vulgaris) mauritanien. Synthèse et nouvelles évaluations par approche globale. Evaluation des ressources et aménagement des pêcheries de la ZEE mauritanienne, Rapport du 6e groupe de travail de l'IMROP 2010, 95-116. Nouadhibou, Mauritanie. P. Labrosse, K. Brahim, O.S. Ould Taleb (Eds.).
4. Chen M.H., Shao Q.M. Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J. Comp. Graph. Stat. 1999, 8:69-92.
5. Clark J.S. Uncertainty and variability in demography and population growth: a hierarchical approach. Ecology 2003, 84:1370-1381.
6. Dawson C.W., Abrahart R.J., See L.M. HydroTest: a web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22:1034-1052.
7. de Valpine P. Review of methods for fitting time-series models with process and observation error and likelihood calculations for nonlinear, non-Gaussian state-space models. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2002, 70:455-471.
8. de Valpine P., Hastings A. Fitting population models incorporating process noise and observation error. Ecol. Monogr. 2002, 72:57-76.
9. Demarcq H., Faure V. Coastal upwelling and associated retention indices derived from satellite SST. Application to Octopus vulgaris recruitment. Oceanol. Acta 2000, 23:391-408.
10. Faure V., Inejih C.A., Demarcq H., Cury P. The importance of retention processes in upwelling areas for recruitment of Octopus vulgaris: the example of the Arguin Bank (Mauritania). Fish. Oceanogr. 2000, 9:343-355.
11. Fernández C., Cerviño S., Pérez N., Jardim E. Stock assessment and projections incorporating discard estimates in some years: an application to the hake stock in ICES Divisions VIIIc and IXa. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2010, 67:1185-1197.
12. Fox W.W. An exponential surplus-yield model for optimizing exploited fish populations. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1970, 99:80-87.
13. Freeman S.N., Kirkwood G.P. On a structural time-series method for estimating stock biomass and recruitment from catch and effort data. Fish. Res. 1995, 22:77-98.
14. Gascuel D., Samba A.O., Vally Y.O., Meissa B., Guitton J. Evolution de l'abondance des ressources démersales en Mauritanie de 1982 à 2006. Evaluation des ressources et aménagement des pêcheries de la ZEE mauritanienne, Rapport du 6e groupe de travail de l'IMROP 2010, 83-94. Mauritanie, Nouadhibou. P. Labrosse, K. Brahim, O.S. Ould Taleb (Eds.).
15. Gelman A., Carlin B.C., Stern H.S., Rubin D.B. Bayesian Data Analysis 2004, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.
16. Gelman A., Meng X.L., Stern H. Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Stat. Sin. 1996, 6:733-760.
17. Gelman A., Rubin D.B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 1992, 7:457-472.
18. Geweke J. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to calculating posterior moments. Bayesian Statistics 4 1992, 169-193. Oxford University Press, UK, Oxford. J.M. Bernardo, J.O. Berger, A.P. Dawiv, A.D.M. Smith (Eds.).
19. Hajas W., Hand C., Duprey N., Lochead J., Deault J. Using production models with new and developing fisheries: a case study using the sea cucumber Parastichopus californias in British Columbia, Canada. Fish. Res. 2011, 110:421-434.
20. Hammond T.R., Trenkel V.M. Censored catch data in fisheries stock assessment. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2005, 62:1118.
21. Harwood J., Stokes K. Coping with uncertainty in ecological advice: lessons from fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:617-622.
22. Hilborn R., Liermann M. Standing on the shoulders of giants: learning from experience in fisheries. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1998, 8:273-283.
23. Hilborn R., Walters C. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty 1992, Chapman and Hall, New York.
24. Ibaibarriaga L., Fernandez C., Uriarte A., Roel B.A. A two-stage biomass dynamic model for Bay of Biscay anchovy: a Bayesian approach. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2008, 65:191-205.
25. Jiao Y., Cortes E., Andrews K., Guo F. Poor-data and data-poor species stock assessment using a Bayesian hierarchical approach. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:2691-2708.
26. Jurado-Molina J., Palleiro-Nayar J.S., Gutierrez N.L. Developing a Bayesian framework for stock assessment and decision analysis of the red sea urchin fishery in Baja California, Mexico. Cienc. Mar. 2009, 35:183-193.
27. Jurado-Molina J. A Bayesian framework with implementation error to improve the management of the red octopus (Octopus maya) fishery off the Yucatán Peninsula. Cienc. Mar. 2010, 36:1-14.
28. Kimura D.K., Balsiger J.W., Ito D.H. Kalman filtering the delay-difference equation: practical approaches and simulations. Fish. Bull. 1996, 94:678-691.
29. Lunn D.J., Thomas A., Best N., Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS - a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput. 2000, 10:325-337.
30. Lunn D.J., Spiegelhalter D., Thomas A., Best N. The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Stat. Med. 2009, 28:3049-3067.
31. Magnusson A., Hilborn R. What makes fisheries data informative?. Fish Fish. 2007, 8:337-358.
32. McAllister M.K., Pikitch E.K., Punt A.E., Hilborn R. A bayesian approach to stock assessment and harvest decisions using the sampling/importance resampling algorithm. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1994, 51:2673-2687.
33. McAllister M.K., Ianelli J.N. Bayesian stock assessment using catch-age data and the sampling - importance resampling algorithm. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1997, 54:284-300.
34. McAllister M.K., Kirkwood G.P. Using Bayesian decision analysis to help achieve a precautionary approach for managing developing fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1998, 55:2642-2661.
35. Meyer R., Millar R.B. BUGS in Bayesian stock assessments. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1999, 56:1078-1087.
36. Michielsens C.G.J., McAllister M.K., Kuikka S., Pakarinen T., Karlsson L., Romakkaniemi A., Pera I., Mantyniemi S. A Bayesian state-space mark-recapture model to estimate exploitation rates in mixed-stock fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2006, 63:321-334.
37. Millar R.B. Reference priors for Bayesian fisheries models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 59:1492-1502.
38. Millar R.B., Meyer R. Non-linear state space modelling of fisheries biomass dynamics by using Metropolis-Hastings within-Gibbs sampling. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. C: Appl. Stat. 2000, 49:327-342.
39. Otero J., Alvarez-Salgado X.A., Gonzalez A.F., Miranda A., Groom S.B., Cabanas J.M., Casas G., Wheatley B., Guerra A. Bottom-up control of common octopus Octopus vulgaris in the Galician upwelling system, northeast Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2008, 362:181-192.
40. Ould Mahmoud E., Ould Mohamed Fall K., Gascuel D., Corten A. Evaluation des ressources démersales en Mauritanie: Groupe de travail IMROP-RIVO 2006, Institut Mauritanien de Recherches Océanographiques et des Pêches: Document Technique, 3, Mauritanie, Nouadhibou.
41. Pedersen M.W., Berg C.W., Thygesen U.H., Nielsen A., Madsen H. Estimation methods for nonlinear state-space models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222:1394-1400.
42. Polacheck T., Hilborn R., Punt A.E. Fitting surplus production models - comparing methods and measuring uncertainty. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1993, 50:2597-2607.
43. Punt A.E. A further preliminary comparative investigation into the performance of catch - effort model estimation procedures used in the management of the ICSEAF hake stocks. Colln. Sci. Pap. Int. Commn. SE Atl. Fish. 1989, 16:63-122.
44. Punt A.E. Extending production models to include process error in the population dynamics. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2003, 60:1217-1228.
45. Punt A.E., Hilborn R. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1997, 7:35-63.
46. Raftery A.E., Lewis S.M. [Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo]: comment: one long run with diagnostics: implementation strategies for Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Stat. Sci. 1992, 7:493-497.
47. Rivot E., Prevost E., Parent E., Bagliniere J.L. A Bayesian state-space modelling framework for fitting a salmon stage-structured population dynamic model to multiple time series of field data. Ecol. Model. 2004, 179:463-485.
48. Robert M., Faraj A., McAllister M.K., Rivot E. Bayesian state-space modelling of the De Lury depletion model: strengths and limitations of the method, and application to the Moroccan octopus fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2010, 67:1272-1290.
49. Rosenberg A.A., Restrepo V.R. Uncertainly and risk evaluation in stock assessment advice for US Marine Fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1994, 51:2715-2720.
50. Schaefer M.B. Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Comm. 1954, 1:27-56.
51. Schnute J.T., Kronlund A.R. Estimating salmon stock-recruitment relationships from catches and escapement data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 59:433-449.
52. Smith A.D.M., Sainsbury K.J., Stevens R.A. Implementing effective fisheries-management systems - management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1999, 56:967-979.
53. Swain D.P., Jonsen I.D., Simon J.E., Myers R. Assessing threats to species at risk using stage-structured state-space models: mortality trends in skate populations. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19:1347-1364.
54. Zhang Z.N., Lessard J., Campbell A. Use of Bayesian hierarchical models to estimate northern abalone, Haliotis kamtschatkana, growth parameters from tag-recapture data. Fish. Res. 2009, 95:289-295.
55. Zhou S., Punt A.E., Deng R., Dichmont C.M., Ye Y., Bishop J. Modified hierarchical Bayesian biomass dynamics models for assessment of short-lived invertebrates: a comparison for tropical tiger prawns. Mar. Freshwater Res. 2009, 60:1298-1308.