A two-stage biomass dynamic model for Bay of Biscay anchovy: A Bayesian approach

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 191-205

  Ibaibarriaga, Leire ^a,b   Fernández, Carmen ^c   Uriarte, Andrés ^a   Roel, Beatriz A ^d  

^a MARINE RESEARCH DIVISION   (Spain)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Instituto Español de Oceanografía   (Spain)

^d CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anchovy; Bayesian; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Mixture distribution; State space model; Stock assessment

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIOMASS; DATA SET; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); STOCHASTICITY; STOCK ASSESSMENT; TELEOST;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BAY OF BISCAY;

ENGRAULIDAE;

EID: 44649101462     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsn002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allain, G., Petitgas, P., Grellier, P., and Lazure, P. 2003. The selection process from larval to juvenile stages of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in the Bay of Biscay investigated by Lagrangian simulations and comparative otolith growth. Fisheries Oceanography, 12: 407-418.
2. Best, N. G., Cowles, M. K., and Vines, S. K. 1997. CODA: Convergence diagnosis and output analysis software for Gibbs sampling output, Version 0.4. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge.
3. Borja, A., Uriarte, A., Egaña, J., Motos, L., and Valencia, V. 1998. Relationships between anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) recruitment and environment in the Bay of Biscay. Fisheries Oceanography, 7: 375-380.
4. Buckland, S. T., Newman, K. B., Thomas, L., and Koesters, N. B. 2004. State-space models for the dynamics of wild animal populations. Ecological Modelling, 171: 157-175.
5. Collie, J. S., and Sissenwine, M. P. 1983. Estimating population abundance data measured with error. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 40: 1871-1879.
6. Cowles, M. K., and Carlin, B. P. 1996. Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91: 883-904.
7. Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., and Gordon, N. 2001. Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice. Springer, New York. 581 pp.
8. Doulman, D. J. 1995. Structure and Process of the 1993-1995 United Nations Conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. FAO Fisheries Circular, 898. 81 pp.
9. FAO. 1995. Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. FAO, Rome. 41 pp.
10. Fréon, P., Cury, P., Shannon, L., and Roy, C. 2005. Sustainable exploitation of small pelagic fish stocks challenged by environmental and ecosystem changes. Bulletin of Marine Science, 76: 385-462.
11. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. B. 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London. 668 pp.
12. Gentleman, R. 1997. A review of BUGS: Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling. Chance, 10: 48-51.
13. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D. J. 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall, London. 486 pp.
14. Hilborn, R., and Walters, C. J. 1992. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, New York. 570 pp.
15. ICES. 2003. Report of the Study Group on Precautionary Reference Points for Advice on Fishery Management. ICES Document CM 2003/ACFM: 15. 85 pp.
16. ICES. 2006. Report of the Working Group on Assessment of Mackerel, Horse Mackerel, Sardine and Anchovy. ICES Document CM 2006/ACFM: 36. 601 pp.
17. Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., and Spiegelhalter, D. 2000. WinBUGS - a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10: 325-337.
18. Mäntyniemi, S., and Romakkaniemi, A. 2002. Bayesian mark-recapture estimation with an application to a salmonid smolt population. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59: 1748-1758.
19. McAllister, M. K., and Ianelli, J. N. 1997. Bayesian stock assessment using catch-at-age data and the sampling-importance resampling algorithm. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54: 284-300.
20. Mesnil, B. 2003. The catch-survey analysis (CSA) method of fish stock assessment: an evaluation using simulated data. Fisheries Research, 63: 193-212.
21. Meyer, R., and Millar, R. B. 1999a. Bayesian stock assessment using state-space implementation of the delay-difference model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56: 37-52.
22. Meyer, R., and Millar, R. B. 1999b. BUGS in Bayesian stock assessments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56: 1078-1087.
23. Michielsens, C. G. J., McAllister, M. K., Kuikka, S., Pakarinen, T., Karlsson, L., Romakkaniemi, A., Perä, I., et al. 2006. A Bayesian state-space mark-recapture model to estimate exploitation rates in mixed-stock fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 63: 321-334.
24. Millar, R. B., and Meyer, R. 2000a. Bayesian state-space modeling of age-structured data: fitting a model is just the beginning. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57: 43-50.
25. Millar, R. B., and Meyer, R. 2000b. Non-linear state-space modelling of fisheries biomass dynamics by using Metropolis-Hastings within-Gibbs sampling. Applied Statistics, 49: 327-342.
26. Motos, L., Uriarte, A., and Valencia, V. 1996. The spawning environment of the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus, L). Scientia Marina, 60(Suppl. 2): 117-140.
27. Newman, K. B., Buckland, S. T., Lindley, S. T., Thomas, L., and Fernández, C. 2006. Hidden process models for animal population dynamics. Ecological Applications, 16: 74-86.
28. Patterson, K. R., and Melvin, G. D. 1996. Integrated catch at age analysis, version 1.2. Scottish Fisheries Research Report, 58. 60 pp.
29. Punt, A. E., and Hilborn, R. 1997. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: a review of the Bayesian approach. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 7: 35-63.
30. Roel, B. A., and Butterworth, D. S. 2000. Assessment of the South African chokka squid Loligo vulgaris reynaudii: is disturbance of aggregations by the recent jig fisheries having a negative impact on recruitment? Fisheries Research, 48: 213-228.
31. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., and Gilks, W. R. 1996. BUGS 0.5, Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling. Manual version ii. Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, England.
32. Thomas, L., Buckland, S. T., Newman, K. B., and Harwood, J. 2005. A unified framework for modelling wildlife populations. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 47: 19-34.
33. Trenkel, V. M., Elston, D. A., and Buckland, S. T. 2000. Fitting population dynamics model to account and cull data using sequential importance sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95: 363-374.
34. Uriarte, A., Prouzet, P., and Villamor, B. 1996. Bay of Biscay and Ibero Atlantic anchovy populations and their fisheries. Scientia Marina, 60: 237-255.