Developing a Bayesian framework for stock assessment and decision analysis of the red sea urchin fishery in Baja California, Mexico;Desarrollo de un marco Bayesiano para la valoración del stock y el análisis de decisión de la pesquería del erizo rojo en Baja California, México

Ciencias Marinas

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 183-193

  Jurado Molina, J ^a   Palleiro Nayar, J S ^b   Gutierrez N L ^c  

^a Secretariat of the Pacific Community   (France)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE LA PESCA   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Constant catch strategy; Constant harvest rate; Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations; Posterior distribution; Schaefer model

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CATCH STATISTICS; DECISION ANALYSIS; ECHINODERM FISHERY; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY SURVEY; HARVESTING; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

BAJA CALIFORNIA [(STT) MEXICO]; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

ECHINOIDEA; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS FRANCISCANUS;

EID: 70349586765     PISSN: 01853880     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7773/cm.v35i2.1528     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andrew NL, Agastuna Y, Ballesteros E, Baxhin AG, Creaser EP, Barnes DKA, Botsford LW, Bradbury A, Campbell A, Dixon JD, Einarsson S, Gerring P, Hebert K, Hunter M, Hurt SB, Johnson CR, Juinio-Menez MA, Kalvass P, Miller RJ, Moreno CA, Palleiro JS, Rivas D, Robinson SML, Schroeter SC, Stenek RS, Vadas RI, Woodby DA, and Xiaoqu Z. 2002. Status and management of world sea urchin fisheries. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 40: 343-425.
2. Beddington JR, Cooke JG. 1983. The potential yield of fish stocks. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 242: 47 pp.
3. Campbell A, Boutillier J, Rogers J. 1999. Discussion on a precautionary approach for management of the red sea urchin fishery in British Columbia. Canadian Stock Assessment Secretariat Research Document 99/094, 156 pp.
4. Christensen V, Walters CJ. 2004. Ecopath with ecosim: Methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecol. Model. 172: 109-139.
5. Fournier D. 1996. An introduction to AD MODEL BUILDER for use in nonlinear modeling and statistics. Otter Research Ltd.
6. Geweke J. 1992. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. In: Berger JO, Bernardo JM, Dawid AP, Smith AFM (eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4: Proceedings of the Fourth Valencia International Meeting. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 169-193.
7. Heidelberger P, Welch P. 1983. Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Oper. Res. 31: 1109-1144.
8. Hilborn R, Walters CJ. 1992. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty. Chapman & Hall, London, 570 pp.
9. Hilborn R, Mangel M. 1997. The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 315 pp.
10. Jurado-Molina J, Livingston PA, Ianelli JN. 2005. Incorporating predation interactions to a statistical catch-at-age model for a predator-prey system in the eastern Bering Sea. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62: 1865-1873.
11. Kalvass PE, Hendrix JM. 1997. The California red sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus fishery: catch, effort and management trend. Mar. Fish. Rev. 59: 21-17.
12. McAllister MK, Kirwood GP. 1998. Bayesian stock assessment: A review and example application using the logistic model. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 55: 1031-1060.
13. National Research Council. 1998. Improving Fish Stock Assessments. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 177 pp.
14. Palleiro-Nayar JS, Lelevier AG, Navarrete M, Romero JM. 1986. Análisis y medidas de regulación de erizo rojo Strongylocentrotus franciscanus en Baja California, México. CRIP Ensenada. Informe Técnico del Instituto Nacional de la Pesca, 54 pp.
15. Palleiro-Nayar JS, Salgado-Rogel MA, Aguilar-Montero D, Romero-Martínez M, Martínez-García FJ. 2004. Análisis de la pesquería del erizo rojo Strongylocentrotus franciscanus en la costa noroccidental de Baja California, México. INPESCA Vol. 1: 67 pp.
16. Punt AE, Hilborn R. 1996. Biomass Dynamics Models. User's Manual. FAO Computerized Information Series (Fisheries), No. 10. FAO, Rome, 62 pp.
17. Punt AE, Hilborn R. 1997. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: The Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher. 10: 50-60.
18. Ramírez-Félix E. 2001. Análisis de la extracción de erizo rojo de mar (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus, A Agassiz 1863) de acuerdo a especie clave y conectividad, en el área de Santo Tomás a Punta China, Baja California. Rev. Cienc. Pesq. (INP) No. 14: 19-22.
19. Schaefer MB. 1954. Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of commercial marine fisheries. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Comm. Bull. 1: 25-56.
20. SEMARNAP. 2001. Sustentabilidad y pesca responsable en México: Evaluación y manejo 1999-2000. Http://cripens.inp.gob.mx/sust_pesc_resp_ev_manejo_1999_2000.
21. Sparre P. 1991. Introduction to multispecies virtual population analysis. ICES Mar. Sci. Symp. 193: 12-21.
22. Walters C, Martell SJD. 2004. Fisheries Ecology and Management. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 399 pp.
23. Zhang Z, Perry RI. 2005. Use of the state-space modeling with Bayesian approach to estimate target reference points for green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) stocks in the Queen Charlot Strait region, British Columbia, Canada. Fish. Res. 74: 253-264.