Proactive and reactive control in S-R compatibility: A brain potential analysis

Psychophysiology

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 756-769

  Mansfield, Karen L ^a   van der Molen, Maurits W ^b   van Boxtel, Geert J M ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognition; EEG ERP; Normal volunteers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860508336     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01368.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performnce XV: Conscious and non-conscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Ansorge, U. (2003). Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction. Visual Cognition, 10, 363-383. doi: 10.1080/13506280244000122.
3. Band, G. P. H., & Van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: Review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica, 101, 179-211. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00005-0.
4. Bartholow, B. D., Pearson, M. A., Dickter, C. L., Sher, K. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2005). Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: Beyond errors and response conflict. Psychophysiology, 42, 33-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00258.x.
5. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624.
6. Blair, R. C., & Karniski, W. (1993). An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. Psychophysiology, 30, 518-524. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02075.x.
7. Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Burle, B., Allain, S., Vidal, F., & Hasbroucq, T. (2005). Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: Does conflict really matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 831-837. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.831.
9. Carriero, L., Zalla, T., Budai, R., & Battaglini, P. P. (2007). Inhibition of wrong responses and conflict resolution: An electroencephalogramstudy. NeuroReport, 18, 793-796. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280c1e330.
10. Carter, C. S., & van Veen, V. (2007). Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 367-379. doi: 10.3758/CABN.7.4.367.
11. Christensen, C. A., Ivkovich, D., & Drake, K. J. (2001). Late positive ERP peaks observed in stimulus-response compatibility tasks tested under speed-accuracy instructions. Psychophysiology, 38, 404-416. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3830404.
12. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731.
13. De Jong, R. (1995). Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty. Acta Psychologica, 88, 187-207. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(94)E0067-P.
14. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.
15. Duncan, J. (1978). Response selection in spatial choice reaction: Further evidence against associative models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 429-440. doi: 10.1080/00335557843000034.
16. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.837.
17. Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00022-M.
18. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737.
19. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514-520. doi: 10.3758/BF03196307.
20. Falkenstein, M. (2002). ERP correlates of erroneous performance. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.), Errors, conflicts, and the brain: Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 5-14). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
21. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 447-455. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9.
22. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1999). ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 101, 267-291. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00008-6.
23. Ferree, T. C. (2006). Spherical splines and average referencing in scalp electroencephalography. Brain Topography, 19, 43-52. doi: 10.1007/s10548-006-0011-0.
24. Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492. doi: 10.1037/h0054967.
25. Forstmann, B. U., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Kaiser, J., & Bledowski, C. (2007). At your own peril: An ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 286-296. doi: 10.3758/CABN.7.4.286.
26. Gajewski, P. D., Stoerig, P., & Falkenstein, M. (2008). ERP correlates of response selection in a response conflict paradigm. Brain Research, 1189, 127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.076.
27. Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385-390. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x.
28. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9.
29. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.331.
30. Guthrie, D., & Buchwald, J. S. (1991). Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 240-244. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb00417.x.
31. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(75)90041-4.
32. Heil, M., Osman, A., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Hennighausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksen-Task: Inhibitory executive processes? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 218-225. doi: 10.1027//0269-8803.14.4.218.
33. Heister, G., & Schroeder-Heister, P. (1994). Spatial S-R compatibility: Positional instructions vs. compatibility instruction. Acta Psychologica, 85, 15-24. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(94)90017-5.
34. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y.
35. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
36. Jentzsch, I., & Leuthold, H. (2005). Response conflict determines sequential effects in serial response time tasks with short response-stimulus intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 731-748. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.731.
37. Jennings, J. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (2005). Preparation for speeded action as a psychophysiological concept. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 434-459. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.434.
38. Jennings, J. R., van der Molen, M. W., van der Veen, F. M., & Debski, K. B. (2002). Influence of preparatory schema on the speed of responses to spatially compatible and incompatible stimuli. Psychophysiology, 39, 496-504. doi: 10.1017.S0048577202394034.
39. Karayanidis, F., Provost, A., Brown, S., Paton, B., & Heathcote, A. (2011). Switch-specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task-switching paradigm. Psychophysiology, 48, 559-568. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01115.x.
40. Kopp, B., Mattler, U., Goertz, & Rist, F. (1996). N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 19-27. doi: 10.1016/0921-884X(96)95617-9.
41. Kopp, B., Rist, F., & Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the Flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology, 33, 282-294. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb00425.x.
42. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253.
43. Lindsen, J. P., & De Jong, R. (2010). Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1207-1226. doi: 10.1037/a0020362.
44. Masaki, H., Falkenstein, M., Stürmer, B., Pinkpank, T., & Sommer, W. (2007). Does the error negativity reflect response conflict strength? Evidence from a Simon Task. Psychophysiology, 44, 579-585. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00522.x.
45. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26. doi: 10.3758/CABN.3.1.17.
46. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Conciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum Press.
47. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 184-187. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6.
48. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbit & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention & performance V (pp. 669-682). New York: Academic Press.
49. Praamstra, P. (2007). Do's and don'ts with lateralized event related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 497-502. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.497.
50. Praamstra, P., Kleine, B. U., & Schnitzler, A. (1999). Magnetic stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex modulates the Simon effect. NeuroReport, 10, 3671-3674.
51. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant and irrelevant trials. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 443-473). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312-323. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7.
53. Ridderinkhof, K. R., van der Molen, M. W., & Bashore, T. R. (1995). Limits on the application of additive factors logic: Violations of stage robustness suggest a dual-process architecture to explain flanker effects on target processing. Acta Psychologica, 89, 315-334. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00031-O.
54. Shaffer, L. H. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 284-288. doi: 10.1037/h0022207.
55. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127.
56. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1987). The continuous flow model revisited: Perceptual and motor aspects. In R. Johnson, Jr., J. W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current trends in event related potential research (EEG Suppl. 40, pp. 270-278). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
57. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169-201. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90005-Z.
58. Stoffels, E. J. (1996a). On stage robustness and response selection routes: Further evidence. Acta Psychologica, 91, 67-88. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(94)00039-5.
59. Stoffels, E. J. (1996b). Uncertainty and processing routes in the selection of a response: An S-R compatibility study. Acta Psychologica, 94, 227-252. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00063-1.
60. Stürmer, B., & Leuthold, H. (2003). Control over response priming in visuo-motor processing: A lateralized event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 35-44. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1579-1.
61. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1345.
62. Stürmer, B., Redlich, I., Irlbacher, K., & Brandt, S. (2007). Executive control over response priming and conflict: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 329-339. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1053-6.
63. Vallesi, A., Mapelli, D., Schiff, S., Amodio, P., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: Different underlying mechanisms? Cognition, 96, B33-B43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.009.
64. van Boxtel, G. J. M., van der Molen, M. W., Jennings, J. R., & Brunia, C. H. M. (2001). A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm. Biological Psychology, 58, 229-262. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00117-X.
65. van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Additive factors analysis of inhibitory processing in the stop-signal paradigm. Brain & Cognition, 56, 253-266. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.006.
66. van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Jaśkowski, P., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (2001). Influence of time-pressure in a simple response task, a choice-by-location task, and the Simon task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 241-255. doi: 10.1027//0269-8803.15.4.241.
67. van Duren, L. L., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed designs. Acta Psychologica, 69, 83-94. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90031-5.
68. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593-602. doi: 10.1162/08989290260045837.
69. Vidal, F., Hasbroucq, T., Grapperon, J., & Bonnet, M. (2000). Is the "error negativity" specific to errors? Biological Psychology, 51, 109-128. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00032-0.
70. Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2004). Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: Elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 539-556. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000387.
71. Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Peters, A. (2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 644-667. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.644.
72. Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 931-959. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.931.