Influence of institutional factors on mathematics achievement of students in the last year of secondary education in Argentina - A three level model;INFLUENCIA DE LOS FACTORES INSTITUCIONALES SOBRE EL LOGRO EN MATEMÁTICA DE LOS ESTUDIANTES EN EL ÚLTIMO AÑO DE LA EDUCACIÓN MEDIA DE ARGENTINA. - UN MODELO DE TRES NIVELES

REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educacion

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  Cervini, Rubén ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860425664     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16964713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aitking, M. y Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 149, pp.1-42.
2. Anderson, C.S. (1982). The search for school climate: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 52, pp.368-420.
3. Angell, A. (1991). Democratic climate in elementary classroom: A review of theory and research. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19, pp.241-286.
4. Angus, L. (1993). The sociology of school effectiveness. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14, pp.333-345.
5. Barr, R. y Dreeben, R. (1983) How Schools Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
6. Brookover, W., Beady, C, Flood, P., Schweitzer, J. y Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School, social systems and student achievement - schools can make a difference. Nueva York: Praeger Publishers.
7. Bryk, A. y Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models for Social and Behavioral Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
8. Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning, Teachers College Record, 43, pp.723-733.
9. Cervini, R. (2002). Desigualdades Socioculturales en el Aprendizaje de Matemática y Lengua de la Educación Secundaria en Argentina: Un modelo de tres niveles." Revista ELectrónica de Investigación y EValuación Educativa, 8 (2), pp.1-25. Consultadoel 15 de Marzo de 2004 en: http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v8n1/RELIEVEv8n2_1.htm
10. Cervini, R. (2003a). Educación Privada, Segmentación Educativa y Resultados Escolares: El caso de la educación secundaria en Argentina - Modelos de tres niveles. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(5). Consultado el 15 de Marzo de 2004 en: http://www.epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n6/.
11. Cervini, R. (2003b) Relaciones entre Composición escolar, Proceso escolar y el Logro en Matemática del nivel Secundario en Argentina - Un modelo de tres niveles. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, vol. 5(1), 2003. Consultado el 15 de Marzo de 2004 en:http://redie.ens.uabc.mx/vol5no1/contenido-cervini2.html
12. Coe, R. y Taylor, C. (1998) School effectiveness research: criticism and recommendations. Oxford Review of Education, 24 (4), pp.421-438.
13. Cooper, H., Valentine, J.C., Nye, B. y Lindsay, J.J. (1999). Relationships between five after-school activities and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 369-378.
14. Creemers, B. (1994) Effective instruction: An empirical basis for a theory of educational effectiveness. En David Reynolds et. al., Advances in School Effectiveness Research and Practice, Cap.10, pp.189-203. Oxford: Pergamon.
15. Daly, P. y Ainley, J. (2000). Recent critiques of school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, pp.131-143.
16. Dunn, R. y Harris, L. (1998). Organizational dimensions of climate and the impact on school achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25, pp.100-104.
17. Everett, S. y Price, J. (1995) Students' perceptions of violence in the public schools: The metlife survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 17(6), 345-352.
18. Fennema, E. y Carpenter, T.P. (1981) Sex related differences in mathematics: Results from national assessment. Mathematics Teacher, 74: 554-559.
19. Fraser, B. (1989). Twenty years of classroom climate work: Progress and prospect. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, pp.307-327.
20. Freidman, L. (1989). Mathematics and the gender gap: A meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks. Review of Educational Research, 59, pp.185-213.
21. Gamoran, A. (1987). The stratification of high school learning opportunities. Sociology of education, 60, pp.135-155.
22. Gerber, S. (1996). Extracurricular activities and academic achievement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30(1), pp. 42-50.
23. Gerwitz, S. (1998) "Can all school be successful? An exploration of determinants of school 'success'. Oxford Review of Education, 24 (4), pp.131-143.
24. Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. London: Griffin.
25. Goldstein, H. (1998). A response to Gibson and Asthana. Oxford Review of education, 24 (4), pp. 521-523.
26. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L.V. y Laine, R.D. (1996). The effect of school resources on achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), pp. 361-396.
27. Hallinan, M. (1988) School composition and learning: A critique of the Dreeben-Barr model. Sociology of education, 61 (July), pp.143-146.
28. Hanushek,E.A.(1989). The impact of differential expenditure on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), pp. 45-65.
29. Haroun, R. y O'Hanlon, C. (1997). Do teacher and students agree in their perceptions of what school discipline is? Educational Research, 49 (3): 237-250
30. Hatcher, R. (1998). Social justice and the politics of school effectiveness and school improvement. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 1, pp.267-289.
31. Hattie, J. (2002). Classroom composition and the peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, pp. 449-481.
32. Hilton, T. L. y Berglund, G.W. (1974) Sex differences in mathematics achievement -e longitudinal study. The Journal of Educational Research, 67, pp. 232-237.
33. Holland, A. y Andre, T. (1987). Participation in extracurricular activities in secondary school: What is known, what needs to be known? Review of Educational Research, 57, pp.437-466.
34. Kablaoui, B.N. y Pautler, A.J. (1991). The effect of part-time work experience on high school students. Journal of Career Development, 17, pp.195-211.
35. Kreft, I. (1993) Using Multilevel analysis to assess school effectiveness: A study of Dutch secondary education. Sociology of education, 66, pp. 104-129
36. Marsh, H (1991) Employment during high school: Character building or a subversion of academic goals? Sociology of Education, 64: pp. 172-189.
37. Marsh, H.W. (1992). Extracurricular activities: Beneficial extension of the traditional curriculum or subversion of academic goals? Journal of Educational Psychology; 84(4), pp. 553-562.
38. Marks, G., McMillan J. y Hillman, K. (2001). Tertiary entrance performance: The rol of student background and school factors. (Longitudinal surveys of Australian youth, Report no 22). Melbourne: ACER.
39. Moos, R. (1979). Evaluating Educational Environments. Washington:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
40. Moos, R. (1980). Evaluating classroom learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 6(3), pp. 239-252.
41. Moos, R. (1987). The social climate manual: Second edition. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
42. Mortimer, J.T., Finch, M.D., Ryu, S., Shanahan, M.J. y Call, K.T. (1996). The effects of work intensity on adolescent mental health, achievement, and behavioral adjustment: New evidence from a prospective study. Child Development, 67: pp. 1243-1261.
43. Nash, R. (2002). Peer effects and peer group processes: Joining the conversation on quantitative and qualitative methods. Australian Journal of Education, 46 (1), pp. 6-18.
44. Nash, R. y Harker, R. (1998) Making progress: Adding value in secondary education. Palmerston North: ERDC Press.
45. Opdenakker, M. y Van Damme, J. (2001). Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematics achievement. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 27, (4), pp.407-432.
46. Parr, J. y Townsend, A. (2002). International Journal of Education Research, 37, pp.403-423.
47. Power, F., Higgins, A. y Kohlberg,L. (1989). Lawrence Kolberg's approach to moral education. New York: Columbia University Press.
48. Purkey, S.C. y Smith, M. (1983).Effective Schools: a Review, Elementary School Journal, 83, pp. 427-52.
49. Quirk, K.; Keith, T. y Quirk, J. (2002). Employment during high school and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis of national data. The Journal of Educational Research, 95 (1), pp. 4-10
50. Raudenbush S. y Bryk, A. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects, Sociology of Education, 59, (January), pp. 1-17.
51. Riddell, A. (1997). Assessing designs school effectiveness research and school improvement in developing countries. Comparative Education Review, 41 (2), pp. 178-204.
52. Scheerens, J. y Bosker, R. (1997). The Foundation of Educational Effectiveness. Oxford:Pergamon.
53. Singh, K. (1998). Part-time employment in high school and its effect on academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 1 pp. 31-139.
54. Slee, R. Weiner, G. With Tomlinson, S. (Eds.) (1998) School Effectiveness for Whom? London: Falmer Press.
55. Steinberg, L. y Kaufman, E. (1995). The impact of employment on adolescent development. Annals of Child Development, 11, pp. 131-166.
56. Steinberg, L. y Dornbush, S.M. (1991) Negative correlates of part-time employment during adolescence: Replication and elaboration. Development Psychology, 27, pp. 304-313.
57. Stringfield, S. (1994) The Analysis of Large Data Bases in School Effectiveness Research. En: David Reynolds et. al., Advances in School Effectiveness Research and Practice, Cap.4, pp.55-72. Oxford: Pergamon.
58. Tagiuri, R. (1968). The concept of organizational climate. En R Tagiuri, y G.H. Litwin (Eds.), Organizational climate: Exploration of a concept. Boston, MA: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research.
59. Teddlie, C. (1994b). The integration of classroom and school process data in school effectiveness research. En: David Reynolds et.alli., Advances in school effectiveness research and practice, Cap. 7, pp. 113-132. Oxford: Pergamon.
60. Teddlie, C. y Reynolds, D. (2001). Countering the critics: Responses to recent criticism f school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(1), pp. 41-82
61. Thrupp, M. (2001a). Sociological and political concerns about school effectiveness research: Time for a new research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(1), pp.7-40
62. Thrupp, M. (2001b). Recent school effectiveness counter-critiques: problems and possibilities. British Educational Research Journal, 27 (4), pp.443-457.
63. Thrupp, M., Lauder, H. y Robinson, T. (2002). School composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, pp. 483-504.
64. Tsai, S.L. y Walberg, H.J. (1983) Mathematic achievement and attitude productivity in junior high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 76, pp. 267-272.
65. Wazman, H. y Ellett, C. (Eds.) (1992). The study of learning environments (vol.5). Houston: College of education. University of Houston.
66. Wilkinson, I., Hattie, J., Parr, J., Townsend, M., Thrupp, M., Lauder, H. y Robinson, T. (2000). Influences of peer effects on learning outcomes: A review of the literature: Report to the Ministry of Education. Auckland: UniService Ltd., University of Auckland.
67. Wilkinson, I., Parr, J., Fung, I., Hattie, J. y Townsend, M. (2002) Discussion: modeling and maximizing peer effects in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, pp. 521-535.