Bioprocess monitoring and control via adaptive sensor calibration

Engineering in Life Sciences

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 402-416

  Krause, Daniel ^a   Birle, Stephan ^a   Hussein, Mohamed A ^a   Becker, Thomas ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bioprocess monitoring; Fuzzy control; Multivariate statistics; Ultrasonic analysis

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SENSORS; BIOPROCESS MONITORING; BIOPROCESSES; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; EXPERT KNOWLEDGE; FLEXIBLE CONTROL; FREQUENCY PROPERTIES; GAS BUBBLE; IN-LINE; INTEGRATED MONITORING; KEY PARAMETERS; LINGUISTIC CONTROL; MECHANISTIC MODELS; MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION; MULTIVARIATE MODELS; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICS; OFFLINE; ON-LINE DETECTION; PREDICTION ERRORS; PROCESS DYNAMICS; PROCESS PARAMETERS; PRODUCT QUALITY; SENSING DEVICES; STATE OBSERVER; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCIES; TEMPORAL CONTROLS; ULTRASONIC ANALYSIS; YEAST GROWTH;

CALIBRATION; ETHANOL; FUZZY CONTROL; FUZZY LOGIC; MONITORING; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; OBSERVABILITY; OPTIMIZATION; SENSORS; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONICS; YEAST;

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

BREWING INDUSTRY; CONTROL SYSTEM; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SENSOR; ULTRASONICS;

AERATION; ARTICLE; BIOPROCESS; BREWING; CALIBRATION; CONTROL SYSTEM; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FUNGUS GROWTH; GAS; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NONHUMAN; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSOR; TEMPERATURE; ULTRASOUND; YEAST;

EID: 84860403981     PISSN: 16180240     EISSN: 16182863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201000215     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Becker, T., Krause, D., Softsensorsysteme-Mathematik als Bindeglied zum Prozessgeschehen. Chem. Ing. Tech. Themenheft Prozessanalytik 2010, 82, 429-440.
2. Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for industry: PAT - a framework for innovative pharmaceutical development, manufacturing and quality assurance 2004.
3. O'Leary, R., Method of analysis for correcting dissolved CO2 content for specific gravity and alcohol variations in beer available (from: [cited 2009.19.03].
4. Neue Hefereinzuchtanlage bei den Kölner Verbund Brauereien (KVB). Brauwelt 2008, 41-42, 1161.
5. Henning, B., Rautenberg, J., Process monitoring using ultrasonic sensor systems. Ultrasonics 2006, 44, e1395-e1399.
6. Hauptmann, P., Hoppe, N., Püttmer, A., Application of ultrasonic sensors in the process industry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2002, 13, R73-R83.
7. Bamberger, J. A., Greenwood, M. S., Measuring fluid and slurry density and solids concentration non-invasively. Ultrasonics 2004, 42, 563-567.
8. Bjørndal, E., Acoustic Measurement of Liquid Density with Applications for Mass Measurement of Oil, University of Bergen, Norway 2007.
9. McClements, D. J., Fairly, P., Ultrasonic pulse echo reflectometer. Ultrasonics 1991, 29, 58-62.
10. Püttmer, A., Hauptmann, P., Henning, B., Ultrasonic density sensor for liquids. IEEE 2Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr. 2000, 47, 85-92.
11. Contreras, N. I., Fairley, P., McClements, D. J., Povey, M. J. W., Analysis of the sugar content of fruit juices and drinks using ultrasonic velocity measurements. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1992, 27, 515-529.
12. Kuo, F.-J., Sheng, C.-T., Ting, C.-H., Evaluation of ultrasonic propagation to measure sugar content and viscosity of reconstituted orange juice. J. Food Eng. 2008, 86, 84-90.
13. Resa, P., Elvira, L., Montero de Espinosa, F., González, R. et al., On-line ultrasonic velocity monitoring of alcoholic fermentation kinetics. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2009, 32, 321-331.
14. Resa, P., Elvira, L., Montero de Espinosa, F., Gómez-Ullate, Y., Ultrasonic velocity in water-ethanol-sucrose mixtures during alcoholic fermentation. Ultrasonics 2005, 43, 247-252.
15. Cha, Y.-L., Hitzmann, B., Ultrasonic measurements and its evaluation for the monitoring of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultivation. Bioautomation 2004, 1, 16-29.
16. Schäfer, R., A contribution to extend the capabilities of ultrasonic process instrumentation, in Fakultät für Elektronik und Informationstechnik, U. Theory, Editor. 2008, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg.
17. Schäfer, R., Carlson, J. E., Hauptmann, P., Ultrasonic concentration measurement of aqueous solutions using PLS regression. Ultrasonics 2006, 44, e947-e950.
18. Henrion, R., Henrion, G., Multivariate Datenanalyse, Springer, Berlin 1995.
19. Kessler, W., Multivariate Datenanalyse, Wiley, Weinheim 2007.
20. Wold, H., Causal flows with latent variables. Partings of the ways in the light of NIPALS modelling. Eur. Econ. Rev. 1974, 5, 67-86.
21. Aynsley, M., Hofland, A., Morris, A., Montague, G. A., Di Masrimo, C., Artificial intelligence and the supervision of bioprocesses (real-time knowledge-based systems and neural networks). Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 1993, 48, 1-27.
22. James, S., Legge, R., Budman, H., Comparative study of black-box and hybrid estimation methods in fed-batch fermentation. J. Process Control 2002, 12, 113-121.
23. Haake, C., Landgrebe, D., Scheper, T., Rhiel, M., Online-Infrarotspektroskopie in der Bioprozessanalytik. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2009, 81, 1385-1396.
24. Schuegerl, K., Progress in monitoring, modeling and control of bioprocesses during the last 20 years. J. Biotechnol. 2001, 85, 149-173.
25. Ulber, R., Frerichs, J.-G., Beutel, S., Optical sensor systems for bioprocess monitoring. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 376, 342.
26. Zhang, H., Software sensors and their applications in bioprocess, Nicolletti, M. D. C., Jain, L. C. (Eds), Computational Intelligence Techniques for Bioprocess Modelling, Supervision and Control, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2009, 25-56.
27. Becker, T., Hitzmann, B., Muffler, K., Pörtner, R. et al., Future aspects of bioprocess monitoring. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2007, 105, 249-293.
28. Chen, L., Nguang, S., Li, X., Chen, X., Soft sensors for on-line biomass measurements. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2004, 26, 191-195.
29. Junker, B. H., Wang, H. Y., Bioprocess monitoring and computer control: Key roots of the current PAT initiative. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 95, 226-261.
30. Nicoletti, M. C., Jain, L. C., Giordano, R. C., Computational intelligence techniques as tools for bioprocess modelling, optimization, supervision and control, Nicolletti, M. D. C., Jain, L. C. (Eds), Computational Intelligence Techniques for Bioprocess Modelling, Supervision and Control, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg 2009, 1-24.
31. Simutis, R., Oliveira, R., Manikowski, M., Azevedo, S. F. et al., How to increase the performance of models for process optimization and control. J. Biotechnol. 1997, 59, 73-89.
32. Jones, K. D., Kompala, D. S., Cybernetic model of the growth dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and continuous cultures. J. Biotechnol. 1999, 71, 105-131.
33. Lodolo, E. J., Kock, J. L., Axcell, B. C., Brooks, M., The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae-the main character in beer brewing. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 1018-1036.
34. Papagianni, M., Boonpooh, Y., Mattey, M., Kristiansen, B., Substrate inhibition kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in fed-batch cultures operated at constant glucose and maltose concentration levels. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 34, 301-309.
35. Van Hoek, P., Van Dijken, J. P., Pronk, J. T., Effect of specific growth rate on fermentative capacity of Baker's yeast. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 4226-4233.
36. Kurz, T., Mathematically based management of Saccharomyces sp. batch propagations and fermentations, Lehrstuhl für Fluidmechanik und Prozessautomation. Muenchen, TU Muenchen 2002.
37. Barford, J. P., Hall, R. J., An examination of the crabtree effect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of respiratory adaptation. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1979, 114, 267-275.
38. Postma, E., Verduyn, C., Scheffers, W. A., Van Dijken, J. P., Enzymic analysis of the crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55, 468-477.
39. Sonnleitner, B., Kaeppeli, O., Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by its limited respiratory capacity: formulation and verification of a hypothesis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1986, 28, 927-937.
40. Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy sets. Information Control 1965, 8, 338.
41. Herrera, E., Exact fuzzy observer for a baker's yeast fermentation process. Int. IFAC Symp. Computer Appl. Biotechnol. 2007, 1, 309-314.
42. Nyttle, V. G., Chidambaram, M., Fuzzy logic control of a fed-batch fermentor. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 1993, 9, 115-118.
43. Venkateswarlu, C., Gangiah, K., Fuzzy modeling and control of batch beer fermentation. Chem. Eng. Commun. 1995, 138, 89-111.
44. Venkateswarlu, C., Naidu, K. V. S., Dynamic fuzzy model based predictive controller for a biochemical reactor. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2000, 23, 113-120.
45. Besli, N., Türker, M., Gul, E., Design and simulation of a fuzzy controller for fed-batch yeast fermentation. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 1995, 13, 141-148.
46. Mahjoub, M., Mosrati, R., Lamotte, M., Fonteix, C. et al., Fuzzy control of baker's yeast fed-batch bioprocess: A robustness study. Food Res. Int. 1994, 27, 145-153.
47. Miokiewicz, T., Kasperski, A., A fuzzy logic controller to control nutrient dosage in a fed-batch baker's yeast process. Biotechnol. Lett. 2000, 22, 1685-1691.
48. Annemüller, G., Manger, H.-J., Lietz, P., Die Hefe in der Brauerei Hefemanagement - Kulturhefe/Hefereinzucht - Hefepropagation im Brauprozess, VLB, Berlin 2008.
49. Birle, S., Fellner, M., Lehmann, J., Wening, H. et al., Yeast Propagation Manager (YPM). Brauwelt Int. 2010, 28, 26-29.
50. Birle, S., Entwicklung, Einführung und Optimierung eines fuzzy-gesteuerten Expertensystems zur vollautomatischen Regelung einer untergärigen Hefepropagation im großtechnischen Maßstab, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Lehrstuhl für Brau- und Getränketechnologie, Technische Universität Muenchen, Muenchen 2010.
51. Hoche, S., Hussein, W. B., Hussein, M. A., Becker, T., Time of flight prediction for fermentation process in-line application. Eng. Life Sci. 2011, doi: 10.1002/elsc.201000177.
52. Mitzscherling, M., Prozeßanalyse des Maischens mittels statistischer Modellierung, Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Technische Universität, München 2004.
53. Risvik, H. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) & NIPALS algorithm. 2007, available from: [cited November 20, 2008].
54. Krause, D., Schöck, T., Hussein, M. A., Becker, T., Ultrasonic characterization of aqueous solutions with varying sugar and ethanol content using multivariate regression methods. J. Chemom. 2011, doi: 10.1002/cem.1384.
55. Martens, H., Næs, T., Multivariate Calibration, Wiley, New York 1991.
56. Hoppe, G. K., Hansford, G. S., Ethanol inhibition of continuous anaerobic yeast growth. Biotechnol. Lett. 1982, 4, 39-44.
57. Barford, J. P., Hall, R. J., A mathematical model for the aerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a saturated respiratory capacity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 23, 1735-1762.
58. Dunn, I. J., Heinzle, E., Ingham, J., Prenosil, J. E., Biological Reaction Engineering - Dynamic Modelling Fundamentals with Simulation Examples, Wiley, Weinheim-New York-Basel-Cambridge 2003.
59. Mamdani, E., Advances in the linguistic synthesis of fuzzy controllers. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 1976, 8, 669-678.
60. Botella, C., Ferré, J., Boqué, R., Outlier detection and ambiguity detection for microarray data in probabilistic discriminant partial least squares regression. J. Chemom. 2010, 24, 434-443.
61. MEBAK, Mitteleuropäische Brautechnische Analysenkommision MEBAK e.V., Band III, 1996.