Avoidance of smoking: The impact of warning labels in Brazil

Tobacco Control

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 405-409

  Nascimento, B E M ^a   Oliveira, L ^b   Vieira, A S ^a   Joffily, M ^a   Gleiser, S ^a   Pereira, M G ^b   Cavalcante, T ^c   Volchan, E ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^c INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CÂNCER   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BRAZIL; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PACKAGING; PHOTOGRAPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; SMOKING;

AROUSAL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BRAZIL; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRODUCT LABELING; PSYCHOMETRICS; SMOKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 57149130109     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2008.025643     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Wakefield M, Flay B, Nichter M, et al. Role of the media in influencing trajectories of youth smoking. Addiction 2003;98(Suppl 1):79-103.
2. Anderson SJ, Glantz SA, Ling PM. Emotions for sale: cigarette advertising and women's psychosocial needs. Tob Control 2005;14:127-35.
3. Gilpin EA, White MM, Messer K, et al. Receptivity to tobacco advertising and promotions among young adolescents as a predictor of established smoking in young adulthood. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1489-95.
4. Philpot SJ, Ryan SA, Torre LE, et al. Effect of smoke-free policies on the behaviour of social smokers. Tob Control 1999;8:278-81.
5. Hersey JC, Niederdeppe J, Evans WD, et al. The effects of state counterindustry media campaigns on beliefs, attitudes, and smoking status among teens and young adults. Prev Med 2003;37:544-52.
6. Wakefield M, Flay B, Nichter M, et al. Effects of anti-smoking advertising on youth smoking: a review. J Health Commun 2003;8:229-47.
7. World Health Organization. Framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.
8. Ministry of Health of Brazil. Graphic health warning labels about the harms associated with tobacco use. Tobacco Control and Cancer Risk Factors Division/Conprev/INCa/Ministry of Health of Brazil, 2004.
9. deTurck MA, Rachlin RA, Young MJ. Effects of a role-model and fear in warning label on perceptions of safety and safety behavior. Adv Consum Res 1994;21:208-12.
10. Hammond D, Fong GT, McNeill A, et al. Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl 3):iii19-25.
11. de Hoog N, Stroebe W, De Wit JBF. The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications: a metaanalysis. Rev Gen Psychol 2007;11:258-85.
12. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. Emotion and motivation: measuring affective perception. J Clin Neurophysiol 1998;15:397- 408.
13. Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG. Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychol Bull 1994;115:401-23.
14. Bradley MM, Codispoti M, Cuthbert BN, et al. Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion 2001;1:276-98.
15. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (lAPSj: affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, 2005.
16. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1994;25:49-59.
17. Rodriguez S, Fernandez MC, Cepeda-Benito A, et al. Subjective and physiological reactivity to chocolate images in high and low chocolate cravers. Biol Psychol 2005;70:9-18.
18. Grusser SM, Heinz A, Raabe A, et al. Stimulus-induced craving and startle potentiation in abstinent alcoholics and controls. Eur Psychiatry 2002;17:188-93.
19. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK, et al. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002;11 (Suppl 1):i73-80.
20. Brazilian Ministry of Health. Health Vigilance Secretary, National Institute of Cancer, Vigilance and Prevention Coordination. Domicile investigation about risk behaviour and related morbidity of diseases and injuries not transmissible: Brazil, 15 Capitals and Federal District 2002/2003 (in Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2004.
21. Carter BL, Tiffany ST. Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 1999;94:327-40.
22. Due DL, Huettel SA, Hall WG, et al. Activation in mesolimbic and visuospatial neural circuits elicited by smoking cues: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:954-60.
23. Chiamulera C. Cue reactivity in nicotine and tobacco dependence: a "multipleaction" model of nicotine as a primary reinforcement and as an enhancer of the effects of smoking-associated stimuli. Brain Res Rev 2005:48:74-97.
24. Azevedo TM, Volchan E, Imbiriba LA, et al. A freezing-like posture to pictures of mutilation. Psychophysiology 2005;42:255- 60.
25. Facchinetti LD, Imbiriba LA, Azevedo TM, et al. Postural modulation induced by pictures depicting prosocial or dangerous contexts. Neurosci Lett 2006;410:52-6.
26. Pereira MG, Volchan E, de Souza GG, et al. Sustained and transient modulation of performance induced by emotional picture viewing. Emotion 2006;6:622-34.
27. Erthal FS, Oliveira L, Mocaiber I, et al. Load-dependent modulation of affective picture processing. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2005;5:388-95.
28. Strahan EJ, White K, Fong GT, et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective. Tob Control 2002;11:183-90.