Cognitive linguistics meets the corpus

Human Cognitive Processing

Volumn 32, Issue , 2011, Pages 257-290

  Stefanowitsch, Anatol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

construction grammar; corpus linguistics; usage based model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860324588     PISSN: 13876724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/hcp.32.16ste     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer 1994. A schema-based approach to grammatical description. In S.D. Lima, R.L. Corrigan & G.K. Iverson. eds., The Reality of Linguistic Rules, 19–42. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics. Investigating Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bowerman, Melissa. 1988. The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: how do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar. In J.A. Hawkins, ed., Explaining Language Universals, 73–101. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
4. Brugman, Claudia. 1981. The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland.
5. Bybee, Joan & Joanne Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37: 575–596.
6. Bybee, Joan & Paul Hopper, Eds. (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
7. Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
8. Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2000. From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 83–102.
9. Diessel, Holger. 2004. The Acquisition of Complex Sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Elman, Jeff L. 1993. Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small. Cognition 48: 71–99.
11. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1979. Discourse constraints on dative movement. In T. Givón, ed., Discourse and Syntax, 441–467. New York: Academic Press.
12. Eye, Alexander von. 2002. Configural Frequency Analysis: Methods, Models, and Applications. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach & R.T. Harms, eds., Universals in Linguistic Theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
14. Fillmore, Charles J. 1971. Some problems for Case Grammar. In R.J. O’Brien, ed., 22nd Annual Round Table. Linguistics: Developments of the Sixties – Viewpoints of the Seventies, 35–56). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
15. Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. Topics in lexical semantics. In P. Cole, ed., Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 76–138. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
16. Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea, ed., Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–138. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.
17. Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics. A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Geeraerts, Dirk. 2006. Introduction: A rough guide to cognitive linguistics. In D. Geeraerts, ed., Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 1–28. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1994. The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
21. Gries, Stefan Th. (2003). Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics. A Study of Particle Placement. London: Continuum Press.
22. Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on ‘alternations.’ International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9: 97–129.
23. Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch, eds. 2006. Corpora in cognitive linguistics. Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
24. Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe, & Doris Schönefeld (2005). Converging evidence: bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16: 635–676.
25. Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander, Richard Goldberg, & Ronald Wilson. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65: 203–257.
26. Halliday, M.A.K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3: 199–244.
27. Hilpert, Martin. 2007. Germanic future constructions. A Usage-Based Approach to Grammaticalization. PhD dissertation, Rice University, Houston.
28. Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming. A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
29. Hopper, Paul. 1987. Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–157.
30. Hunston, Susan & Francis Gill. 2000. Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
31. Kennedy, Graeme D. 1998. An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman.
32. Koide, Yuka, & Sandra A. Thompson. 1986. Iconicity and “indirect objects” in English. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 399–406.
33. Lakoff, George. 1970. Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
34. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35. Lakoff, George. & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
36. Langacker, Ronald W. 1967. Language and Its Structure. Some Fundamental Linguistic Concepts. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
37. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
38. Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Concept, Image and symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
39. Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
40. McEnery, Anthony & Andrew Wilson. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
41. Meurers, Detmar. 2005. On the use of electronic corpora for theoretical linguistics. Case studies from the syntax of German. Lingua 115: 1619–1639.
42. Meyer, Charles F. 2002. English Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Partington, Alan. 1998. Patterns and Meaning. Using Corpora for English Language Research and Teaching. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
44. Pedersen, Ted. 1996. Fishing for exactness. In Proceedings of the South Central SAS Users Group Conference, 188–200. Austin, TX.
45. Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and Cognition. The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Rice, Sally. 1996. Prepositional prototypes. In M. Pütz & R. Dirven, eds., The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, 135–165. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
47. Rosch, Eleanor H. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–350.
48. Rosch, Eleanor H. 1975. Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104: 573–605.
49. Ross, John Robert. 1968. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
50. Sandra, Dominiek & Sally Rice. 1995. Network analyses of prepositional meanings: Mirroring whose mind – the linguist’s or language user’s? Cognitive Linguistics 6: 89–130.
51. Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
52. Schütze, Carson. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
53. Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2005. Quantitative Korpuslinguistik und sprachliche Wirklichkeit. In Ch. Solte-Gresser, K. Struve, & N. Ueckmann, eds., Von der Wirklichkeit zur Wissenschaft. Aktuelle Forschungsmethoden in den Sprach-, Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaften, 147–161. Hamburg: LIT-Verlag.
54. Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2007. Linguistics beyond grammaticality (A reply to Sampson). Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2.3: 57–71.
55. Stefanowitsch, Anatol. & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8: 209–243.
56. Stefanowitsch, Anatol. & Stefan Th. Gries. 2005. Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 1–43.
57. Stefanowitsch, Anatol. & Stefan Th. Gries, eds. 2006. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
58. Taylor, John R. 1996. Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
59. Taylor, John R. 2007. Metaphors of linguistic knowledge: The generative metaphor vs. the mental corpus. In I. Ibarretxe Antuñano, C. Inchaurralde Besga, and J. M. Sánchez García, eds. Language, Mind, and the Lexicon, 69–104. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.
60. Thompson, Sandra A. 1990. Information flow and dative shift in English discourse. In J.A. Edmondson, C. Feagin, & P. Muhlhäusler, eds., Development and Diversity: Language Variation Across Time and Space, 239–253. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
61. Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
62. Tummers, José, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts. 2005. Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics. A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 225–261.
63. Wiechmann, Daniel. 2008. Sense-contingent lexical preferences and early parsing decisions: Corpus evidence from local NP/S-ambiguities. Cognitive Linguistics 19: 439–455.
64. Wulff, Stefanie, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan Th. Gries. 2007. Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, Th. Berg, & P. Siemund, eds., Aspects of Meaning Construction in Lexicon and Grammar, 265–281. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
65. Zeschel, Arne. 2007. Delexicalization Patterns. A Corpus-Based Approach to Incipient Productivity in Fixed Expressions. PhD dissertation, University of Bremen.