Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement

Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-226

  Gries, Stefan Thomas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85189232045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (227)

1. Aarts, ß. (1989) Verb-preposition constructions and small clauses in English. Journal of Linguistics 25: 277-90.
2. Aarts, B. (1992) Small Clauses in English: The Non-Verbal Types. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruytcr.
3. Abney, S. (1996) Statistical methods and linguistics. In J. Klavans and P. Rcsnik (eds), The Balancing Act. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 1 26.
4. Altenberg, B. (1982) The Genitive Construction v. the instrucłion: A Study of Syntactic Variation in Seventeenth Century English. Lund: CWK Leerup.
5. Anderson, J. R. 1996. Kognilive Psychologic, 2nd cd. Heidelberg, Berlin, Oxford: Spektrum.
6. Armstrong, S. L., L. R. Gleitman and H. Glcitman (1983) What some concepts might not be. Cognition 13: 263-308.
7. Arnold, J. E. and T. Wasow (1996) Production Constraints on Particle Movement and Dative Alternation. Poster presented at the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
8. Arnold, J. E. et al. (2000) Heaviness vs. newness: the cfĭccts of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. language 76: 28 55.
9. Baker, M. (1988) Incorporation: Λ Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Bates, E. and A. Dtvescovi (1989) Crosslinguistic studies of sentence production. In B. MacWhinney and E. Bates (eds), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence. Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225-53.
11. Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney (1982) Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (eds), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 173-218.
12. Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney (1989) Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney and E. Bates (eds), The Crosslinguistic Study cf Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-73.
13. Beals, K. et al. (eds) 1994. Papers from, the Thirtieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 2: 7 he Parasesńon on Variation in Linguistic Theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
14. Behaghel, O. (1930). Von dcutscher Wortstellung. ¦ζeitsǽrififurDeutsckkunde 44: 81-9.
15. Behaghel, O. (1932) Deutsche Syntax: Eine Geschicht·liche Darstellung, Vol. IV: Wortstellung, Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Carl Winters.
16. Berg, T. (1998) Linguistic Structure and Change: An Explanation from Language Processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Berg, T. and U. Schadc (2000). A local conncctionist account of consonant harmony in child language. Cognitive Science 24: 123-49.
18. Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad and E. Finegan (1999) Longman Gram-mar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
19. Biber, D. (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Biber, D. (1995) Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Bickerton, D. (1971) Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7: 457-92.
22. Birbaumer, N. and R. F. Schmidt (1991) tìiologisǽe Psjchologie. 2nd rev. cd. Berlin: Springer.
23. Birner, B. J. and G. Ward (1998) Information Status and Moncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
24. Bock, J. K. (1977) The effect of pragmatic presupposition on syntactic structure in question answering. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 16: 723 34.
25. Bock, J. K. (1982) Towards a cognitive psychology of syntax: information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89: 1-47.
26. Bock, J. K. (1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18: 355-87.
27. Bock, J. K. (1990) Structure in language: creating form in talk. American Psychologist 45: 1221-36.
28. Bolinger, D. (1971) Tl·ư Phrasal Verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Bolkestcin, A. M. and R. Risselada (1987) The pragmatic motivation of syntactic and semantic perspective. In J. Verschuercn and M. Bertucelli-Papi (eds), The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected Papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 497-512.
30. Bolkestein, A. M. (1985) Cohesiveness and syntactic variation: quantitative vs. qualitative grammar. In A. M. Bolkestcin, C. de Grootand J. L. Mackenzie (eds), Syntax and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 1 15.
31. Bortz, J., G. A. Licnert and K. Boehnke (1990) Verltilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatis-tik. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
32. Bortz, J. (1999) Statistikfur Sozialwissenschaftler. 5th ed. Berlin: Springer.
33. Bortz, J. and N. Döring, (1995) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. 2nd comp, revised and updated edition. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
34. Bowcrman, M. (1983) How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar in the absence of feedback about what is not a sentence? Papers and Reports on Child [jinguage Development 22: 23 35.
35. Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen and C. J. Stone (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole Advanced Books and Software.
36. Broihier, K. et al. (1994) The Acquisition of t!ư Germanic VPC. Paper delivered at the Eighteenth Boston University Conference on Language Development.
37. Browman, C. P. (1986) The hunting of the quark: the particle in English. Language and Speech 29: 311-34.
38. Brown, P. M. and G. S. Dell (1987) Adapting production to comprehension: the explicit mention of instruments. Cognitive Psychology 19: 441-72.
39. Burnard, L. (ed.) (1995) Users Refermce Guide for the British National Corpus (Version 1.0). Oxford University Computing Services.
40. Carlson, G. N. and M. K. Tanenhaus (1988) Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (cd.) Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Relations. New York: Academic Press, pp. 263-88.
41. Carstensen, B. (1964) Zur Struktur des englischen \Vortvcrbandes. Die Neueren Sprachen 13: 305-28.
42. Ceđergren, H. and D. Sankoff (1974) Variable rules: performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50: 333-55.
43. Chafe, W. (1994) Discourse. Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
44. Charlton, R. (1990) English Verb-Particle Colligations. Doctoral Dissertation, IJniversität des Saarlandes at Saarbrücken.
45. Chen, P. (1986) Discourse and particle movement in English. Studies in Language 10: 79-95.
46. Chomsky, N. A. (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
47. Chomsky, N. A. (1961) On the notion ‘rule of grammar’. In R. Jakobson (ed.) Structure of Language and Its Mathematics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 6 24.
48. Church, K. W. and P. Hanks (1990) Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics 16: 22-9.
49. Clark, H. H. (1977) Bridging. In P Johnson-Laird and P C. Wasoπ (eds) Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 411-20.
50. Clifford, J. (1990) Grammar and Activation of Referents in Working Memory: The Case of Particle Movement. Technical Report, University of Colorado at Boulder.
51. Clifton, C. Jr., S. Speer and S. P. Abney (1991) Parsing arguments: phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 251-71.
52. Cohen, J. (1983) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Collins, C. and H. Thráinsson (1996) VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391 444.
54. Cowart, W. (1997) Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
55. Cowie, A. P. and R. Mackin (1993) Oxford Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Croft, W. (1995) Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language 71: 490-532.
57. Curme, G. O. (1931) Syntax. Boston.
58. Curme, G. O. (1935) A Grammar of the English Language: Parts of Speech and Accidence. Boston.
59. Danes, F. (1966) A three-level approach to syntax. In F. Danes et al. (eds) Traaaux Linguislique de Prague. University of Alabama Press, pp. 225-40.
60. Deane, P. ü. (1987) English possessives, topicality, and the Silverstein Hierarchy. In J. Aske et al. (eds) Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 64-76.
61. Deane, P. D. (1992) Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
62. Dehé, N. (2000) On particle verbs in English: more evidence from information structure. In N. M. Antrim, G. Goddall, M. Schulte-Nafeh and V Samian (eds) Proceedings oĵ the 28th Western Conference on Linguistics. Fresno, CA: California State University, pp. 92-105.
63. Dell, G. S. (1986) A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93: 283-321.
64. Dell, G. S. and P. A. Rcich (1981) Stages in sentence production: an analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour ‘20: 611-29.
65. Dell, G. S. et al. (1997) Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review 104: 801-38.
66. Dell, G. S. and P. G. O’Seaghdha (1991) Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition 42: 287-314.
67. Dell, G. S., F. Chang and Z. M. Griffin (1999) Connectionist models of language production: lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science 23: 517-42.
68. Den Dikken, M. (1995) Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic, and Causative Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Deutschbein, M. (1917) System der neuenglischen Syntax. Cothern Verlag von Otto Schulzc.
70. Dirvcn, R. and G. Radden (1977) Semantische Syntax des Englischen. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
71. Emonds, J. (1972) Evidence that indirect object movement is a structure preserving rule. Foundations of Language 5: 546-61.
72. Erades, P. A. (1961) Points of modern English syntax. English Studies 42: 56-60.
73. Fairclough, N. L. (1965) Some English Phrasal Types: Studies in the Collocation of lexical Items with Prepositions and Adverbs in a Corpus of Spoken and Written Present-Day English. MA Thesis, University College London.
74. Fasold, R. (1990) The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
75. Fass, D. (1991) Met*: a method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics 17: 49-90.
76. Fay, D. (1980) Transformational errors. In V A. Fromkin (ed.) Errors in Linguistic Performance. New York: Academic Press, pp. 441-68.
77. Ferreira, V (1996) Is it better to give than to donate? Syntactic flexibility in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 724-55.
78. Fijn van Draat, P. (1921) The place of the adverb: a study in rhythm. JVeophilologus 6: 56-88.
79. Fischer, S. D. (1971) ‘The Acquisition of Verb-Particle and Dative Constructions’. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
80. Francis, W. N. (1958) The Structure of American English. New York: Ronald Press.
81. Fraser, B. (1965) ‘An Examination of the Verb-Particle Construction in English’. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
82. Fraser, B. (1966) Some remarks on the Verb-Particle Construction in English. In F. P. Dinnccn (ed.) Problems in Semantics, History of Linguistics, Linguistics and English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 45-61.
83. Fraser, B. (1974) The phrasal verb in English. By Dwight Bolinger. Language 50: 568-75.
84. Fraser, B. (1976) The Verb-Particle Combination in English. New York: Academic Press.
85. Frazier, L. (1979) On Comprehending Sentences: Syntactic Parsing Strategies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
86. Frazier, L. (1985) Syntactic complexity. In D. Dowty, L. Karttunen and A. Zwicky (eds) Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129-89.
87. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88. Givón, T. (1979) On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
89. Givón, T. (ed.) (1983) Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross language Study. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
90. Givón, T. (1988) The pragmalics of word order: predictability, importance, and attention. In M. Hammond, E. A. Moravcsik and J. Wirth (eds) Studies in Syntactic 'Typology. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 243-84.
91. Givón, T. (1992a). On interpreting text-distributional correlations: some methodological issues. In D. L. Payne (ed.) Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 305 20.
92. Givón, T. (1992b) The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics 30: 5 55.
93. Goldberg, A. (1992) The inherent semantics of argument structure. Cognitive Linguistics 3: 37-74.
94. Goldberg, A. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
95. Goldberg, A. (1996) Construction grammar. In E. K. Brown and J. Miller (eds) Concise Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
96. Goldman-Ľisler, E (1968) Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. New York: Academic Press.
97. Gries, St. Th. (1999) Particle movement: a cognitive and functional approach. Cognitive Linguistics 10: 105-46.
98. Gries, St. Th. (2002) Preposition stranding in English: predicting speakers’ behaviour. In V Samiian (ed.) Proceedings of the 12th Western Conference on linguistics 2000. Fresno, CA: California State University, pp. 230-41.
99. Gries, St. Th. (forthcoming) Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. International SCOLA Journal.
100. Gries, St. Th. and A. Stefanowitsch (submitted) Extending collostructional analysis: a corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. University of Southern Denmark and University of Bremen.
101. Gropen, J., S. Pinker, M. Hollander, R. Goldberg and R. Wilson (1989) The learn-ability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65: 203 57.
102. Guy, G. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: the case of final stop deletion. In Wτ. Labov (ed.) Locating language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1 36.
103. Guy, G. (1994) The phonology of variation. In K. Beals et al. (eds) Papers from, the Thirtieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 133-49.
104. Haiman, J. (1992) Iconicity. In W. Bright (ed. in chid) International Encylopedia of Linguistics. Vol. 2. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 191-5.
105. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
106. Hawkins, J. A. (1991) Syntactic weight versus information structure in word order variation. In J. Jacobs (ed.) Informationsstmktur und Grammatik. Opladen: VVestdcut-scher Verlag, pp. 196-220.
107. Hawkins, J. A. (1994) A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge Líniversity Press.
108. Hawkins, J. A. (2000) The relative order of prepositional phrases in English: going beyond manner-płace-tίine. Language Variation and Change 11: 231-66.
109. Ħeliel, M. H. (1994) Verb-particle combinations in English and Arabic. In R. de Beaugrande, S. A. Talal and M. H. Heliel (eds) language, Discourse and Translation in the West and Middle East. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 141 -52.
110. Hillert, D. (1998) Verb processing in German and English: ambiguity, discontinuous forms, and thematic complexity. In D. Hillert (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 31: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. New York: Academic Press, pp. 247-63.
111. Hiltunen, R. (1983) The Decline of the Prefixes and Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb: The Evidence from Some Old and Early Aliddle English Texts. Turku.
112. Horton, W S. and B. Kcysar (1996) When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition 59: 91-117.
113. Hudson, R. (1997) Inherent variability and linguistic theory. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 73-108.
114. Hunter, P. J. (1981) Verb-Particle Position in English. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Alberta.
115. Hyams, N., J. Schaeffer and K. B. Johnson (1993) On the Acquisition of VPCs. Manuscript, University of California at Los Angeles and University of Amherst.
116. Johnson, K. B. (1991) Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 577-636.
117. Johnson, K. B. (1992) Scope and the Binding Theory: comments on Zubizarreta. In J. A. Stowell and E. Wehrli (eds) Syntax and the Lexicon: Syntax and Semantics 26. New York, San Diego, London: Academic Press, pp. 259-75.
118. Kay, P. (1995) Construction grammar. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman and J. Blommaert (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics: λíanual. Amsterdam, Philadephia: John Benjamins, pp. 171-7.
119. Kayne, R. (1985) Principles of particle constructions. In J. Gueron, H.-G. Obenauer and J.-Y. Pollock (eds) Grammatical Representation. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 101-40.
120. Kennedy, A. G. (1920) The Modern English Verb-Adverb Combination. Stanford: Stanford University Publication.
121. Kennedy, G. (1998) An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman.
122. Kiffer, T. (1965) A Diachronic and Synchronic Analysis and Description of English Phrasal Verbs. Doctoral Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
123. Kimball, J. (1973) Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition 2: 15 49.
124. Kroch, A. S. (1994) Morphosyntactic variation. In K. Beals el al. (eds) Papers from the Thirtieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 180-201.
125. Kruisinga, E. and P A. Ľrades (1953) An English Grammar. Vol. I. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
126. Labov, W. (1969) Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45: 715-62.
127. Labov, W. (1975) Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In R. Austerlitz (ed.) The Scope of American Linguistics. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press, pp. 77-133.
128. Lakoff, G. (1972) Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In P. Peranteau, J. N. Levi and G. C. Phares (eds) Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 183-228.
129. LakofΓ, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
130. Lakoff, G. (1991) Cognitive vs. generative linguistics: how commitments influence results. Language and Communication 11: 53-62.
131. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
132. Lamb, S. (1999) Pathways of the Brain. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
133. Lambrecht, K. (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134. Langacker, R. W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
135. Langacker, R. W. (1997) Constituency, dependency; and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 1-32.
136. Leech, G·, B. Francis and X. Xu (1994) The use of computer corpora in the textual đemonstrability of gradience in linguistic categories. In C. Fuchs and B. Victorri (eds) Continuity in Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 57-76.
137. Legum, S. (1968) The verb-particle construction in English, basic or derived? In B. J. Darden, C.-J. Bailey and A. Davison (eds) Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 50-62.
138. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) Speaking: From Thinking to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
139. Levin, H·, I. Silverman and B. Ford (1967) Hesitations in children’s speech during explanation and description. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal'Behaviour 6: 560 4.
140. Lindner, S. (1981) A Lexico-Semanŧic Analysis of English Verb-Particle Constructions with up and out. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at San Diego.
141. Live, A. (1965) The discontinuous verb in English. Word 211 428-51.
142. Lyons, J. (1981) Language and Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
143. McClelland, J. L. and D. E. Rumelhart (1982) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. Psychological Review 89: 60-94.
144. McDonald, J. L., J. K. Bock and M. H. Kelly (1993) Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognition Psychology, 25: 188-230.
145. McDonald, J. and B. MacWhinney (1989) Maximum likelihood models for sentence processing. In B. MacWhinney and E. Bates (eds) The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397-421.
146. MacDonald, M. C. (1996) Representation and activation in syntactic processing. In T. Inui and j. L. McClelland (eds) Attention and Performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 433-56.
147. McEnery, T. and A. Wilson (1997) Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
148. MacKay, D. G. (1970) Phoneme repetition in the structure of languages. Language and Speech 13: 199-213.
149. MacKay, D. G. (1971) Stress pre-entry in motor systems. American Journal of Psychology 84: 35-51.
150. MacKay, D. G. (1987) The Organization of Perception and Action. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
151. MacWhinney, B. (1989) Competition and connectionism. In B. MacWhinney and E. Bates (eds) 7 he Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 422 57.
152. Martin, P. (1990) The Phrasal Verb: Diachronic Development in British and American English. Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University.
153. Master Metaphor List. 02.12.1999 .
154. Mattairc, M. (1972/1712) The English Grammar. London.
155. Mazurkcwich, I. and L. White (1984) The acquisition of the dative alternation: unlearning ovcrgcncralizations. Cognition 16: 261-83.
156. Meroney; H. M. (1943) Old English upp, uppe, uppon and upon. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
157. Mitchell, T. F. (1958) Syntagmatic relations in linguistic analysis. Transactions of the Philological Society 56: 101-18.
158. Morgan, P. S. (1997) Figuring out figure out: metaphor and the semantics of the English verb-particle construction. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 327-57.
159. Moss, H. E·, S. McCormick and L. K. Tyler (1997) The time-course of activation of semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 12: 695-731.
160. Neeleman, A. (1994) Complex Predicates. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
161. Nelson, F. W. and H. Kucera (1982) Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
162. Nisbett, R. E. and L. Ross (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
163. Nisbett, R. E. and T. D. Wilson (1977) Telling more than we can know. Psychological Review 84: 231-59.
164. Nuyts, J. (1995) Functionalism vs. Formalism. In J. Verschucren, J.-O. Ostman and j. Blommaert (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 293-300.
165. O’Dowd, E. M. (1994) Prepositions and Particles in English: A Discourse-Based, Unifying Account. Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.
166. O’Dowd, E. M. (1998) Prepositions and Particle: A Discourse-Functional Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
167. Oakes, M. (1998) Statisticsfor Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
168. Ostman, J.-O. and T. Virtanen (1997) Theme, Comment, and Newness: Revisiting the Oh-So-Often Revisited. Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam.
169. Palmer, F. R. (1988) The English Verb. 3rd ed. London: Longman.
170. Peters, J. (1999) Discourse Factors Influencing the Ordering of Constituents in the Verb Particle Construction. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Alberta.
171. Peters, J. (2001) Given vs. new information influencing constituent ordering in the verb-particle construction. In R. Brend, A. K. Mclby and A. Lommel (eds) LACUS Forum XXVII: Speaking and Comprehending. Fullerton, CA: LACUS, pp. 133 40.
172. Potter, S. (1965) English phrasal verbs. Philokgica Pragensia 8: 285-9.
173. Prince, E. F. (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223-56.
174. Prince, E. F. (1991) On functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language and Communication 11: 79-82.
175. Quirk, R·, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London, New York: Longman.
176. Radford, A. (1988) Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
177. Roberts, M. H. (1936) The antiquity of the Germanic verb-adverb locution. Journal of English and German Philology 35: 466-81.
178. Rohdenburg, G. (1996) Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149 82.
179. Rohdenburg, G. and B. Mondorf (eds) 2003 Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
180. Rohrbacher, B. (1994) English main verbs move never. Penn Review of linguistics 18: 145-59.
181. Rosch, E. and C. B. Mcrvis (1975) Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573 -605.
182. Ross, J. R. (1986) Infinite Syntax. Norwood: Ablex.
183. Roth, G. (1997) Das Gehirn und seine Wirkliǽkeil: Kognitive Neurobiologie und ihre philoso-þhischen Kυnsequenzen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
184. Rumelhart, D. E. and j. L. McClelland (1981) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. Psychological Review 88: 375-407.
185. Schlüter, J. (2003) Phonological determinants of grammatical variation in English: Chomsky’s worst possible case. In G. Rohdenburg and B. Mondorf (eds) Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruytcr.
186. Schreudcr, R. et al. (1990) Lexical processing, morphological complexity-and reading. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores D’Arcais and K. Rayner (eds) Comprehension Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 125-41.
187. Schütze, C. T. (1996) The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammatically Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
188. Selkirk, Ľ. O. (1984) Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
189. Shluktenko, J. A. (1955) Uber die sogenanntcn zusammengesetzten Vcrben vom Typ stand up in der englischen Sprachc dcr Gegenwart. Sour¡etwissenschaft 8: 223-35. 1
190. Siewierska, A. (1988) Word Order Rides. London: Croom Helm.
191. Siewierska, A. (1993) Syntactic weight vs information structure and word order variation in Polish. Journal of linguistics 29: 233-65.
192. Stallings, L. M., M. C. MacDonald and P. O’Seaghdha (1998) Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: phrase length and verb disposition in Heavy-Í\P Shift. Journal of Memory and Language 39: 392 417.
193. StatSoft, Inc. (1999) Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft, .
194. Stembergcr, J. P. (1982a) The nature of segments in the lexicon: evidence from speech errors. Lingua 56: 235-59.
195. Stemberger, J. P. (1982b) Syntactic errors in speech, 'journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11:313-45.
196. Stemberger, J. P. (1985) An interactive activation model of language production. In A. Ľllis (ed.) Progress in the Psychology of Language. London: Routledge, pp. 143-86.
197. Stowell, T. A. (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology at Cambridge, MA.
198. Stucky, S. (1987) Configurational variation in English: a study of extraposition and related matters. In G. J. Huck and A. E. Ojeda (eds) Discontinuous Constituency: Syntax and Semantics 20. New York: Academic Press, pp. 377-405.
199. Sweet, H. A. (1892) A New English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
200. Taha, A. K. (1960) The structure of two-word verbs in English. language Learning 10: 115-22.
201. Taha, A. K. (1964) The structure of two-word verbs in English. In H. B. Allen (ed.) Readings in Applied English Linguistics. New York: Meredith, pp. 130-6.
202. Talmy, L. (1985) Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description 3: Grammatical Categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-149.
203. Taylor, J. R. (1995) Linguistic Categorisation: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
204. Tomlin, R. S. (1986) Basic Word Order: Functional Principles. London, Sydney: Croom Helm.
205. Tyler, L. K. and W. D. Marslen-Wiison (1977) The on-line effects of semantic context and syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 16: 683-92.
206. Urban, S. and A. D. Fricdcrici (1999a) Zur Bereitstellung von Vcrb-Argument-Strukturen im Sprachverstehensprozeß: Evidenzen aus ercigniskorrelierten Hirnpotential-Untersuchungen. In I. Wachsmuth and B. Jung (eds) Proceedings der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaftfur Kògnitionswissenschajìen Bielφld (28.9.-1.10.99). Sankt Augustin: Infix-Verlag.
207. Urban, S. and A. D. Friedcrici (1999b) Zur Verarbeitung komplexcr Verben: Zwei EKP-Studien mit separierbaren komplexen Verben. In E. Schrögcr, A. Meckliriger and A. Widmann (eds) Experimentelle Psychologie. ßeiträge zur 41. Tagung experimental arbάtenderPsychologen, Leipzig (28.3. 1.4 1999). Leπgerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
208. Van Dongen, W A., Sr. (1919) He puts on his hat and He puts his hat on.,Neophilolo-gus 4: 322-53.
209. Van Hout, R. (1995) Statistics. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman and J. Blommacrt (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual. Amsterdam, Philadephia: John Benjamins, pp. 624-7.
210. Vennemann, T. (1988) Preference IMWS for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change: With Special Reference to German, Germanic, Italian, and Latin. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
211. Vestcrgaard, T. (1974) Review of Bolinger (1971). English Studies 55: 303-8.
212. Von Schon, C. V (1977) The Origin of Phrasal Verbs in English. Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
213. Wardaugh, R. (1986) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
214. Wasow, Th. (1997a) End-weight from the speaker’s perspective. Journal of Psycho-linguistic Research 26: 347-61.
215. Wasow, Th. (1997b) Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9: 81-105.
216. Werner, J. (1997) Lineare Statistik: Das Allgemeine Lineare Model!. Weinhcim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
217. Western, A. (1906) Some, remarks on the use of English adverbs. Englmhe Studien 6: 75-100.
218. Winer, B. J., D. R. Brown and K. M. Michels (1991) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
219. Yeagle, R. (1983) ‘The Syntax and Semantics of English VPCs with off: A Space Grammar Analysis’. Unpublished MA thesis, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
220. Zöfel, P. (1992) Statistik in da Praxis. 3rd rev. and extended edition. Stuttgart, Jena: Gustav Fischer.
221. Benson, M., E. Benson and R. Ilson (1997) BBI Dictionary of English Word Combinations. Revised edition. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
222. Cambridge International Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs (1997) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
223. Collins Cobuild E-Dict CD-ROM (1999) London: Harper Collins.
224. Courtney, R. (1983) Longman Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. London: Longman.
225. Cowie, A. P. and R. Mackin (1975) Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English. Volume 1: Verbs with Prepositions and Particles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
226. Cowie, A. P. and R. Mackin (1993) Oxford Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
227. Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (1999) English Phrasal Verbs: A Cognitive Approach. Manuscript.