Unusual predator-prey dynamics under reciprocal phenotypic plasticity

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 305, Issue , 2012, Pages 96-102

  Mougi, Akihiko ^a  

^a RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Antiphase cycle; Cryptic cycle; Inducible defense; Inducible offense; Population cycle

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLASTICITY; POPULATION CYCLE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ANTIPHASE CYCLE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CRYPTIC CYCLE; FITNESS; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POPULATION DENSITY DEPENDENCE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION SIZE; PREDATION; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84860263046     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abrams P.A. Adaptive foraging by predators as a cause of predator-prey cycles. Evol. Ecol. 1992, 6:56-72.
2. Abrams P.A. The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. Am. Nat. 1999, 153:83-97.
3. Abrams P.A. Habitat choice in predator-prey systems: spatial instability due to interacting adaptive movements. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:581-594.
4. Abrams P.A., Matsuda H. Prey adaptation as a cause of predator-prey cycles. Evolution 1997, 51:1742-1750.
5. Abrams P.A., Cressman R., Křivan V. The role of behavioral dynamics in determining the patch distributions of interacting species. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:505-518.
6. Abrams P.A., Matsuda H., Harada Y. Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 1993, 7:465-487.
7. Agrawal A.A. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 2001, 294:321-326.
8. Agrawal A.A., Ackerly D.D., Adler F., Arnold A.E., Cáceres C., Doak D.F., Post E., Hudson P.J., Maron J., Mooney K.A., Power M., Schemske D., Stachowicz J., Strauss S., Turner M.G., Werner E. Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:145-152.
9. Berg M.P., Ellers J. Trait plasticity in species interactions: a driving force of community dynamics. Evol. Ecol. 2010, 24:617-629.
10. Bohannan B.J.M., Lenski R.E. Linking genetic change to community evolution: insights from studies of bacteria and bacteriophage. Ecol. Lett. 2000, 3:362-377.
11. Bulmer M.G. Phase relations in the ten-year cycle. J. Anim. Ecol. 1975, 44:609-621.
12. Cortez M.H. Comparing the qualitatively different effects rapidly evolving and rapidly induced defences have on predator-prey interactions. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:202-209.
13. Cortez M.H., Ellner S.P. Understanding rapid evolution in predator-prey interactions using the theory of fast-slow dynamical systems. Am. Nat. 2010, 176:E109-E127.
14. DeWitt T.J., Sih A., Wilson D.S. Costs an limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:77-81.
15. Edgell T.C., Rochette R. Prey-induced changes to a predator's behaviour and morphology: implications for shell-claw covariance in the northwest Atlantic. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 2009, 382:1-7.
16. Fussmann G.F., Loreau M., Abrams P.A. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:465-477.
17. Hairston N.G., Ellner S.P., Geber M.A., Yoshida T., Fox J.A. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:1114-1127.
18. Jeschke J.M. Density-dependent effects of prey defenses and predator offenses. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 242:900-907.
19. Jones L.E., Ellner S.P. Effects of rapid prey evolution on predator-prey cycles. J. Math. Biol. 2007, 55:541-573.
20. Kishida O., Nishimura K. Bulgy tadpoles: inducible defense morph. Oecologia 2004, 140:414-421.
21. Kishida O., Mizuta Y., Nishimura K. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator-prey interaction between larval amphibians. Ecology 2006, 87:1599-1604.
22. Kishida O., Trussell G.C., Nishimura K. Top-down effects on antagonistic inducible defense and offense. Ecology 2009, 90:1217-1226.
23. Kishida O., Trussell G.C., Mougi A., Nishimura K. Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator-prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology. Popul. Ecol. 2010, 52:37-46.
24. Kondoh M. Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science 2003, 299:1388-1391.
25. Kondoh, M., 2007. Anti-predator defence and the complexity-stability relationship of food webs. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 274, 1617-1624.
26. Kopp M., Gabriel W. The dynamic effects of an inducible defense in the Nicholson-Bailey model. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2006, 70:43-55.
27. Kopp M., Tollrian R. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator-prey system: inducible offences against inducible defences?. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6:742-748.
28. Lima S.L. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions. Bioscience 1998, 48:25-34.
29. Miner B.G., Sultan S.E., Morgan S.G., Padilla D.K., Relyea R.A. Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:685-692.
30. Mougi A. Predator-prey coevolution driven by size selective predation can cause anti-synchronized and cryptic population dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2012, 81:113-118.
31. Mougi, A., Iwasa, Y., 2010. Evolution towards oscillation or stability in a predator-prey system. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 277, 3163-3171.
32. Mougi A., Iwasa Y. Unique coevolutionary dynamics in a predator-prey system. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 277:83-89.
33. Mougi A., Kishida O. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity can lead to stable predator-prey interaction. J. Anim. Ecol. 2009, 78:1172-1181.
34. Mougi, A., Nishimura, K., 2008. The paradox of enrichment in an adaptive world. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 275, 2563-2568.
35. Mougi A., Kishida O., Iwasa Y. Coevolution of phenotypic plasticity in predator and prey: why are inducible offenses rarer than inducible defenses?. Evolution 2011, 65:1079-1087.
36. Murdoch W., Briggs C., Nisbet R. Consumer-resource dynamics 2003, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
37. Ramos-Jiliberto R. Population dynamics of prey exhibiting inducible defenses: the role of associated costs and density-dependence. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2003, 64:221-231.
38. Ramos-Jiliberto R., Garay-Narváez L. Qualitative effects of inducible defenses in tropic chains. Ecol. Complex. 2007, 4:58-70.
39. Ramos-Jiliberto R., Frodden E., Aránguiz-Acuña A. Pre-encounter versus post-encounter inducible defenses in predator-prey model systems. Ecol. Model. 2007, 200:99-108.
40. Ramos-Jiliberto R., Mena-Lorca J., Flores J.D., Morales-Álvarez W. Role of inducible defenses in the stability of a tritrophic system. Ecol. Complex. 2008, 5:183-192.
41. Relyea R.A. Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 2004, 85:172-179.
42. Schoeppner N.M., Relyea R.A. Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:505-512.
43. Schoeppner N.M., Relyea R.A. Detecting small differences: risk response curves for predator-induced behavior and morphology. Oecologia 2008, 154:743-754.
44. Smith L.D., Palmer A.R. Effects of manipulated diet on size and performance of brachyuran crab claws. Science 1994, 264:710-712.
45. Tirok K., Bauer B., Wirtz K., Gaedke U. Predator-prey dynamics driven by feedback between functionally diverse trophic levels. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e27357.
46. Tollrian R., Harvell C.D. The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses 1999, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
47. Trussell G.C. Phenotypic plasticity in an intertidal snail: the role of a common crab predator. Evolution 1996, 50:448-454.
48. Van Buskirk J., Arioli M. Dosage response of an induced defense: how sensitive are tadpoles to predation risk?. Ecology 2002, 83:1580-1585.
49. Van Buskirk J., Ferrari M., Kueng D., Näpflin K., Ritter N. Prey risk assessment depends on conspecific density. Oikos 2011, 120:1235-1239.
50. Van Donk E., Lürling M., Lampert W. The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses 1999, 89-103. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. R. Tollrian, C.D. Harvell (Eds.).
51. Verschoor A.M., Vos M., Van Der Stap I. Inducible defences prevent strong population fluctuations in bi- and tri-trophic food chains. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:1143-1148.
52. Vos M., Kooi B.W., DeAngelis D.L., Mooij W.M. Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment. Oikos 2004, 105:471-480.
53. Vos M., Verschoor A.M., Kooi B.W., Wäckers F.L., DeAngelis D.L., Mooij W.M. Inducible defenses and trophic structure. Ecology 2004, 85:2783-2794.
54. Werner E.E., Peacor S.D. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 2003, 84:1083-1100.
55. Yamamichi M., Yoshida T., Sasaki A. Comparing the effects of rapid evolution and phenotypic plasticity on predator-prey dynamics. Am. Nat. 2011, 178:287-304.
56. Yoshida T., Jones L.E., Ellner S.P., Fussmann G.F., Hairston N.G. Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature 2003, 424:303-306.
57. Yoshida T., Ellner S.P., Jones L.E., Bohannan B.J.M., Lenski R.E., Hairston N.G. Cryptic population dynamics: rapid evolution masks trophic interactions. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e235.