Bulgy tadpoles: Inducible defense morph

Oecologia

Volumn 140, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 414-421

  Kishida, Osamu ^a   Nishimura, Kinya ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Close cue; Phenotypic plasticity; Predation; Remote cue; Reversibility

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; CHEMICAL CUE; GAPE LIMITATION; INDUCED RESPONSE; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

CAUDATA; HYNOBIUS RETARDATUS; RANA PIRICA;

EID: 4344672120     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1609-0     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adler FR, Harvell CD (1990) Inducible defenses, phenotypic variability and biotic environments. Trends Ecol Evol 5:407-410
2. Agrawal AA (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294:321-326
3. Brönmark C, Miner JG (1992) Predator-induced phenotypical change in body morphology in crucian carp. Science 258:1348-1350
4. Brönmark C, Pettersson LB (1994) Chemical cues from piscivores induce a change in morphology in crucian carp. Oikos 70:396-402
5. Clark CW, Harvell CD (1992) Inducible defenses and the allocation of resources a minimal model. Am Nat 139:521-539
6. Dahl J, Peckarsky BL (2002) Induced morphological defenses in the wild: predator effects on a mayfly, Drunella coloradensis. Ecology 83:1620-1634
7. Dewitt TJ, Sih A, Wilson DS (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:77-81
8. Gabriel W (1999) Evolution of reversible plastic responses: inducible defenses and environmental tolerance. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 286-305
9. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190
10. Hanazato T (1990) Induction of helmet development by a Chaoborus factor in Daphnia ambigua during juvenile stages. J Plankton Res 12:1287-1294
11. Harvell CD (1984) Predator-induced defenses in a marine bryozoan. Science 224:1357-1459
12. Havel JE (1987) Predator-induced defenses: a review. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 263-278
13. Kusch J (1993) Induction of defensive morphological changes in ciliates. Oecologia 94:571-575
14. Lardner B (1998) Plasticity or fixed adaptive traits? Strategies for predation avoidance in Rana arvalis tadpoles. Oecologia 117:119-126
15. Laurila A, Crochet PA, Merila J (2001) Predation-induced effects on hatchling morphology in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Can J Zool 79:926-930
16. McCollum SA, Leimberger JD (1997) Predator-induced morphological changes in an amphibian: predation by dragonflies affects tadpole shape and color. Oecologia 109:615-621
17. McCollum SA, Van Buskirk J (1996) Costs and benefits of a predator-induced polyphenism in the gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis. Evolution 50:583-593
18. Michimae H, Wakahara M (2001) Factors which affect the occurrence of cannibalism and the broad-headed "cannibal" morph in larvae of the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:339-345
19. Michimae H, Wakahara M (2002) A tadpole-induced polyphenism in the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Evolution 56:2029-2038
20. Ohdachi S (1994) Growth, metamorphosis, and gape-limited cannibalism and predation on tadpoles in larvae of salamanders Hynobius retardatus. Zool Sci 11:127-131
21. Relyea RA (2001) Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82:523-540
22. Relyea RA (2003) Predators come and predators go: the reversibility of predator-induced traits. Ecology 84:1840-1848
23. Sato T (1990) Breeding sites of a salamander, Hynobius retardatus (in Japanese with English abstract). Bull Obihiro Centenn City Mus 8:1-10
24. Skelly DK, Werner EE (1990) Behavioral and life-historical responses of larval American toads to an odonate predator. Ecology 71:2313-2322
25. Smith DC (1983) Factors controlling tadpole populations of the chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata) on Isle Royale, Michigan. Ecology 64:501-510
26. Stemberger RS, Gilbert JJ (1984) Spine development in the rotifer Keratella cochlearis: induction by cyclopoid copepods and Asplanchna. Freshwater Biol 14:639-647
27. Stenson JAE (1987) Variation in capsule size of Holopedium gibberum (Zaddach): a response to invertebrate predation. Ecology 68:928-934
28. Tollrian R (1995) Predator-induced morphological defenses: costs, life history shifts, and maternal effects in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 76:1691-1705
29. Tollrian R, Harvell CD (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton
30. Trussell GC (1996) Phenotypic plasticity in an intertidal snail: the role of a common crab predator. Evolution 50:448-454
31. Van Buskirk J (2001) Specific induced responses to different predator species in anuran larvae. J Evol Biol 14:482-489
32. Van Buskirk J (2002) A comparative test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: relationship between habitat and phenotype in anuran larvae. Am Nat 160:87-102
33. Van Buskirk J, Arioli M (2002) Dosage response of an induced defense: how sensitive are tadpoles to predation risk? Ecology 83:1580-1585
34. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (1999) Plasticity and selection explain variation in tadpole phenotype between ponds with different predator composition. Oikos 85:31-39
35. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (2000a) Functional mechanisms of an inducible defence in tadpoles: morphology and behaviour influence mortality risk from predation. J Evol Biol 13:336-347
36. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (2000b) Influence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. J Exp Biol 203:2149-2158
37. West-Eberhard MJ (1989) Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:249-278