Pre-encounter versus post-encounter inducible defenses in predator-prey model systems

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 200, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 99-108

  Ramos Jiliberto, Rodrigo ^a   Frodden, Ernesto ^a   Aránguiz Acuña, Adriana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Bifurcations; Ecology; Inducible defenses; Paradox of enrichment; Phenotypic plasticity; Population dynamics; Predator prey models; Stability

Indexed keywords

BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS); ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METABOLISM; STABILITY;

MORTALITY; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATOR PREY MODELS;

BIODIVERSITY;

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; DEFENSE MECHANISM; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENCOUNTER RATE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

EID: 37849189585     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.023     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abrams P.A., and Walters C.J. Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment. Ecology 77 (1996) 1125-1133
2. Agustí S. Light environment within dense algal populations: cell size influences on self-shading. J. Plankton Res. 13 (1991) 863-871
3. Altwegg R., Marchinko K.B., Duquette S.L., and Anholt B.R. Dynamics of an inducible defence in the protist Euplotes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 160 (2004) 431-446
4. Brönmark C., and Miner J.G. Predator-induced phenotypical change in body morphology in crucian carp. Science 258 (1992) 1348-1350
5. Barry M.J. The costs of crest induction for Daphnia carinata. Oecologia 97 (1994) 278-288
6. Berryman A.A. Do trophic interaction causes population cycles?. In: Berryman A.A. (Ed). Population Cycles. The Case for Trophic Interaction (2002), Oxford University Press, NY 177-187
7. Berryman A.A., Michalski J., Gutierrez A.P., and Arditi R. Logistic theory of food web dynamics. Ecology 76 (1995) 336-343
8. Burns C.W. Crowding-induced changes in growth, reproduction and morphology of Daphnia. Freshwater Biol. 43 (2000) 19-29
9. Collings J.B. Bifurcation and stability analysis of a temperature-dependent mite predator-prey interaction model incorporating a prey refuge. Bull. Math. Biol. 57 (1995) 63-76
10. Doedel E.J. The computer-aided bifurcation analysis of predator-prey models. J. Math. Biol. 20 (1984) 1-14
11. Ermentrout B. Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems. A Guide to XPPAUT for Researchers and Students (2002), SIAM, Philadelphia p. 290
12. Frank S.A. A model of inducible defense. Evolution 47 (1993) 325-327
13. Getz, W.M., 1994. A metaphysiological approach to modeling ecological populations and communities. In: Levin, S.A. (Ed.), Frontiers in Mathematical Biology. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol. 100. Springer-Verlag, NY, pp. 411-442.
14. Gilbert J.J. Rotifer ecology and embryological induction. Science 151 (1966) 1234-1237
15. González-Olivares E., and Ramos-Jiliberto R. Dynamic consequences of prey refuges in a simple model system: more prey, fewer predators and enhanced stability. Ecol. Model. 166 (2003) 135-146
16. Hainzl J. Stability and Hopf bifurcation in a predator-prey system with several parameters. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 48 (1988) 170-190
17. Harrison G.W. Global stability of predator-prey interactions. J. Math. Biol. 8 (1979) 139-171
18. Harvell C.D. The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Q. Rev. Biol. 65 (1990) 323-340
19. Harvell C.D., and Tollrian R. Why inducible defenses?. In: Tollrian R., and Harvell C.D. (Eds). The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses (1999), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ pp. 3-9
20. Hessen D.O., and van Donk E. Morphological changes in Scenedesmus induced by substances released from Daphnia. Arch. Hydrobiol. 127 (1993) 129-140
21. Holling C.S. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Entomol. 91 (1959) 293-320
22. Ives A.R., and Dobson A.P. Antipredator behavior and the population dynamics of simple predator-prey systems. Am. Nat. 130 (1987) 431-447
23. Karban R., and Carey J.R. Induced resistance of cotton seedlings to mites. Science 225 (1984) 53-54
24. Kamenir Y. Further evidence of nonnutrient constraints on phytoplankton abundance. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37 (1992) 681-683
25. Kendall B.E., Prendergast J., and Bjornstad O.N. The macroecology of population dynamics: taxonomic and biogeographical patterns in population cycles. Ecol. Lett. 1 (1998) 160-164
26. Kirk K.L. Enrichment can stabilize population dynamics: autotoxins and density dependence. Ecology 79 (1998) 2456-2462
27. Kopp M., and Gabriel W. The dynamic effects of an inducible defense in the Nicholson-Bailey model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 70 (2006) 43-55
28. Krueger D.A., and Dodson S.I. Embryological induction and predation ecology in Daphnia pulex. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26 (1981) 219-223
29. Kuhlmann H.W., and Heckmann K. Interspecific morphogens regulating prey-predator relationships in protozoa. Science 227 (1985) 1347-1349
30. Lampert W. The adaptive significance of diel vertical migration of zooplankton. Funct. Ecol. 3 (1989) 21-27
31. Lass S., and Spaak P. Chemically induced anti-predator defences in plankton: a review. Hydrobiologia 491 (2003) 221-239
32. Lürling M., Roozen F., Van Donk E., and Goser B. Response of Daphnia to substances released from crowded congeners and conspecifics. J. Plankton Res. 25 (2003) 967-978
33. McNair J.M. The effects of refuges on predator-prey interactions: a reconsideration. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29 (1986) 38-63
34. Maionchi D.O., dos Reis S.F., and de Aguiar M.A.M. Chaos and pattern formation in a spatial tritrophic food chain. Ecol. Model. 191 (2006) 291-303
35. Maynard-Smith J. Models in Ecology (1974), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge p. 146
36. Mitchell S.E., and Carvalho G.R. Comparative demographic impacts of 'info-chemicals'and exploitative competition: an empirical test using Daphnia magna. Freshwater Biol. 47 (2002) 459-471
37. Murdoch W.W., and Oaten A. Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9 (1975) 2-132
38. Peacor S.D. Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviour. Ecol. Lett. 5 (2002) 77-85
39. Ramos-Jiliberto R. Population dynamics of prey exhibiting inducible defenses: the role of associated costs and density-dependence. Theor. Popul. Biol. 64 (2003) 221-231
40. Ramos-Jiliberto R. Resource-consumer models and the biomass conversion principle. Environ. Model. Softw. 20 (2005) 85-91
41. Ramos-Jiliberto R., and González-Olivares E. Relating behaviour to population dynamics: a predator-prey metaphysiological model emphasizing zooplankton diel vertical migration as an inducible response. Ecol. Model. 127 (2000) 221-233
42. Ramos-Jiliberto R., González-Olivares E., and Bozinovic F. Population-level consequences of antipredator behavior: A metaphysiological model based on the functional ecology of the leaf-eared mouse. Theor. Popul. Biol. 62 (2002) 63-80
43. Rosenzweig M.L. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171 (1971) 385-387
44. Sih A. Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot W.C., and Sih A. (Eds). Predation. Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities (1987), University Press of New England, Hanover, NH 203-224
45. Skelly D.K., and Werner E.E. Behavioral and life historical responses of larval American toads to an odonate predator. Ecology 71 (1990) 2313-2322
46. Srinivasu P.D.N., and Gayatri I.L. Influence of prey reserve capacity on predator-prey dynamics. Ecol. Model. 181 (2005) 191-202
47. Stich H.B., and Lampert W. Predator evasion as an explanation of diurnal vertical migration by zooplankton. Nature 293 (1981) 396-398
48. Smith D.C., and Van Buskirk J. Phenotypic design, plasticity, and ecological performance in two tadpole species. Am. Nat. 145 (1995) 211-233
49. Tollrian R., and Harvell C.D. The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses (1999), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ p. 383
50. Tschirhart J. A new adaptive system approach to predator-prey modeling. Ecol. Model. 176 (2004) 255-276
51. Turchin P. Complex Population Dynamics: A Theoretical/ Empirical Synthesis (2003), Princeton University Press, NJ p. 450
52. Van der Stap I., Vos M., and Mooij W.M. Linking herbivore- induced defences to population dynamics. Freshwater Biol. 51 (2006) 424-434
53. Verschoor A.M., Vos M., and van der Stap I. Inducible defences prevent strong population fluctuations in bi- and tritrophic food chains. Ecol. Lett. 7 (2004) 1143-1148
54. Vos M., Verschoor A.M., Kooi B.W., Wäckers F.L., DeAngelis D.L., and Mooij W.M. Inducible defenses and trophic structure. Ecology 85 (2004) 2783-2794
55. Vos M., Kooi B.W., DeAngelis D.L., and Mooij W.M. Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment. Oikos 105 (2004) 471-480