The paradox of enrichment in an adaptive world

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 275, Issue 1651, 2008, Pages 2563-2568

  Mougi, Akihiko ^a,b   Nishimura, Kinya ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Evolution; Optimal foraging; Paradox of enrichment; Predator prey; Stabilization

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; OPTIMUM FORAGING THEORY; POPULATION ECOLOGY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ARTICLE; DIET; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FOOD WEB; FORAGING; GENETIC TRAIT; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 54249095552     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0889     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abrams, P. A. & Walters, C. J. 1996 Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment. Ecology 77, 1125-1133. (doi:10.2307/2265581)
2. Arditi, R. & Ginzburg, L. R. 1989 Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 139, 311-326. (doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80211-5)
3. Arditi, R., Callois, J.-M., Tyutyunov, Y. & Jost, C. 2004 Does mutual interference always stabilize predator-prey dynamics? A comparison of models. Compt. Rend. Biol. 327, 1037-1057. (doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2004.06. 007)
4. Fryxell, J. M. & Lundberg, P. 1994 Diet choice and predator-prey dynamics. Evol. Ecol. 8, 407-421. (doi:10.1007/BF01238191)
5. Fussmann, G. F., Loreau, M. & Abrams, P. A. 2007 Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 21, 465-477. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01275.x)
6. Genkai-Kato, M. & Yamamura, N. 1999 Unpalatable prey resolves the paradox of enrichment. Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 1215-1219. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0765)
7. Gilpin, M. E. 1975 Group selection in predator-prey communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Jensen, C. X. J. & Ginzburg, L. R. 2005 Paradoxes or theoretical failures? The jury is still out. Ecol. Model. 188, 3-14. (doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.05.001)
9. Kondoh, M. 2003 Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food web complexity and stability. Science 299, 1388-1391. (doi:10.1126/science.1079154)
10. Kondoh, M. 2007 Anti-predator defence and the complexity-stability relationship of food webs. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 1617-1624. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0335)
11. Kretzschmar, M., Nisbet, R. M. & McCauley, E. 1993 A predator-prey model for zooplankton grazing on competing algal populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 44, 32-66. (doi:10.1006/tpbi.1993.1017)
12. Ma, B. O., Abrams, P. A. & Brassil, C. E. 2003 Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice. Am. Nat. 162, 668-684. (doi:10.1086/378783)
13. Matsuda, H., Hori, M. & Abrams, P. A. 1996 Effects of predator-specific defence on biodiversity and community complexity in two-trophic-level communities. Evol. Ecol. 10, 13-28. (doi:10.1007/BF01239343)
14. Mougi, A. & Nishimura, K. 2007 A resolution of the paradox of enrichment. J. Theor. Biol. 248, 194-201. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi. 2007.04.005)
15. Mougi, A. & Nishimura, K. In press. Enrichment can damp population cycles: a balance of inflexible and flexible interactions. Oikos. (doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16688.x)
16. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1971 Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171, 385-387. (doi:10.1126/science.171.3969.385)
17. Stephens, D. W. & Krebs, J. R. 1986 Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Takimoto, G. 2003 Adaptive plasticity in ontogenetic niche shifts stabilizes consumer-resource dynamics. Am. Nat. 162, 93-109. (doi:10.1086/375540)
19. Templeton, A. R. & Lawlor, L. R. 1981 The fallacy of averages in ecological optimization theory. Am. Nat. 117, 390-393. (doi:10.1086/283719)
20. Vos, M., Kooi, B. W., DeAngelis, D. L. & Mooij, W. M. 2004 Inducible defences and paradox of enrichment. Oikos 105, 471-480. (doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12930.x)
21. Yamauchi, A. & Yamamura, N. 2005 Effects of defense evolution and diet choice on population dynamics in a one-predator-two-prey system. Ecology 86, 2513-2524. (doi:10.1890/04-1524)