Implant surface modifications: A review

Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 319-324

  Garg, Hemlata ^a   Bedi, Gaurav ^a   Garg, Arvind ^b  

^a SHARDA UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Krishna Dental College   (India)

Author keywords

Hydrophilic surface laser etching nanotitania osseointegration aniodized implants biotolerant

Indexed keywords

BIOCERAMICS; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FLUORIDE; HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOPARTICLE; NANOTITANIA; POLITEF; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYETHERETHERKETONE; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANODIZED SURFACE IMPLANT; BLASTED SURFACE; BONE REGENERATION; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CHEMICAL PROCEDURES; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL LASER ETCHING; DIP COATING METHOD; ELECTROPHORESIS; FLOURIDE SURFACE TREATMENT; GRIT BLASTING ETCHING; HOT ISOSTATIC PRESSING; HUMAN; HYDROPHILICITY; MACHINED SURFACE; MATERIAL COATING; MICRO ARC OXIDATION; OXIDATION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PLASMA SPRAYING; POWDER PRECOMPRESSED; REVIEW; SAND BLASTING ETCHING; SOL GEL METHOD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VACUUM DEPOSITION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84860002576     PISSN: 2249782X     EISSN: 0973709X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Jayaswal GP, Dange SP, Khalikar AN. Bioceramics in dental implants: A review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010; 10:8-12.
2. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: A review of the current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(1):63-74.
3. Muddugangadhar BC, Amarnath GS, Tripathi S, Dikshit S, Divya MS. Biomaterials for dental implants: An overview. Int J Oral Implantology Clin Res 2011;2(1):13-24.
4. Anusavice Kenneth J. Philips Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. St Louis; Saunders Elsevier: 2005.
5. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow up of implants of differing surface roughness which were placed in a rabbit bone. Int J Oral maxillofac Implants 1997; 12(4):486-494.
6. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographical evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants 2000; 15:331-344.
7. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. The design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially available oral implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8:622-633.
8. Chehroudi B, Gould TRL, Brunette DM. Titanium-coated micro-machined grooves of different dimensions affect the epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 1990; 24:1203-1219.
9. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piatteli M, Piatteli A. Surface analysis of machined versus sand blasted and acid etched Ti implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15(6):779-784.
10. Coelho PG, Cardaropoli G, Suzuki M, Lemons JE. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness of bioceramic deposition on endos-seous implants: A study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2009; 11(4):292-302.
11. Ducheyne P, Willems G, Martens M, Helsen J. In vivo metal ion release from porous titanium-fbre material. J Biomed Mater Res 1984; 18:293-308.
12. Kummer FJ, Ricci JL, Bluementhal NC. RF plasma treatment of the metallic implant surfaces. J Applied Biomater 1992; 3:39-44.
13. Woodman JL, Jacobs JJ, Galante JO, Urban R. Metal ion release from titanium-based prosthetic segmental replacements of the long bones in baboons: A long term study. J Orthop Res 1984; 1:421-430.
14. Savarino L, Cenni E, Stea S, Donati ME, Paganetto G, Moroni A, et al. X-ray diffraction of newly formed bone which was close to the alumina or the hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem. Biomaterials 1993; 14: 900-905.
15. Osborn JF, Willich P, Meenen N. The release of titanium into the human bone from a titanium implant which was coated with plasma sprayed titanium. In: Heimke G, Solteoz U, Lee AJC (eds). Clinical implant material. Advances in Biomaterials: Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1990;9:75-80.
16. Ducheyne P. Titanium and calcium phosphate ceramic dental implants, surfaces, coatings and interfaces. J Oral Implantol 1988; 14: 325-440.
17. Blumenthal NC, Cosma V. Inhibition of apatite formation by the titanium and the vanadium ions. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 1989; 23:13-22
18. Memoli VA, Woodman JL, Urban RM, Galante JO. Long term bio-compatibility of the porous titanium fbre metal composites [Abstract]. Presented at the 29th Annual Orthopaedic Research Society, Anaheim, California, 8-10 Mar 1983.
19. Lugowski SJ, Smith C, McHugh AD, van Loon JC. Release of metal ions from dental implant materials in vivo: Determination of Al, Co, Cr, Mo, Ni, V and Ti in organ tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 1992; 25:1443-1458.
20. Jimbo R, Sawase T, Baba K, Kurogi T, Shibata Y, Atsuta M. Enhanced initial cell responses to chemically modifed anodized titanium. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008; 10:55-61.
21. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and the bone to implant contact with fuoride modifed titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(5):659-61466.
22. Occuzzo M, Wilson, Thomas G. A prospective study of the 3 weeks loading of chemically modifed titanium implants in the maxillary molar region: 1-year results. Int J oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(1):65-72.
23. Jarmer T, Palmquist A, Branemark R, Hermansson L, Engqvist H, Thomsen P. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants by using scanning electron microscopy, a focussed ion beam, and high resolution transmission electron microscopy. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2008; 10(1):11-22.
24. Guo Z, Zhou L, Rong M, Zhu A, Geng H. Bone response to a pure titanium implant surface which was modifed by laser etching and micro-arc oxidation. Int J oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25(1):130-136.
25. Li LH, Kong YM, Kim HW, et al. Improved biological performance of the Ti implants due to surface modifcations by micro-arc oxidation. Biomaterials 2004; 25:2867-2875.
26. Gaggl A, Shultes G, Muller WD, Karcher H. Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser treated titanium implant surfaces-A comparative study. Biomaterials 2000; 21:1067-1073.
27. Cho SA, Jung SK. A removal torque of the laser treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia. Biomaterials 2003; 24:4859-4863.
28. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Chakarov D, Gold J, Wennerberg A. An in vivo study of the bone response to implants which were topographically modifIed by laser micromachining. Biomaterials 2003; 24:701-710.
29. Itala AL, Ylanen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT. A pore diameter of more than 100mm is not a requisite for the bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 58:679-683.
30. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, et al. Characteristics of surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants upto the dielectric breakdown: The oxide thickness, micropore confgurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 2002; 23:491-501.
31. Han Y, Xu K. Photoexcited formation of bone apatite-like coatings on micro-arc oxidized titanium. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 71:608-614.
32. Zhu L, Ye X, Tang G, et al. The corrosion test, the cell behaviour test, and an in vivo study of the gradient TiO2 layers which were produced by compound electrochemical oxidation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 78:515-522.
33. Nasatzky E, Gultchin A, Schwartz Z. The role of surface roughness in promoting osseointegration. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim 2003; 20(3):8-19.
34. Deppe H, Warmuths A, Heinrich A, Kroner T. Laser assisted three dimensional surface modifications of the titanium implants: Preliminary data. Lasers Med Sci 2005; 19:229-233.
35. Song WH, Jun YK, Han Y, Hong SH. Biomimetic apatite coatings on micro-arc oxidized titania. Biomaterials 2004; 25:3341-3349.
36. Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Which surface properties enhance the bone response to implants? A comparison of the oxidized magnesium, TiUnite and the Osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19:319-328.
37. Mohammadi S, Esposito M, Hall J, Emanuelsson L, Krozer A, Thomsen P. Long term bone response to titanium implants which were coated with thin, radiofrequent, magnetron-sputtered hydroxyapatite in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(4):498-509.
38. Meirelles L, Melin L, Peltola T, Kjellin P, Kangasniemi I, Currie F, et al. Effect of the hydroxyapatite and the titania nanostructures on the early in vivo bone response. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2008; 10(4): 245-254.
39. Sykaras N, Woody Ronald D, Lacopino Anthony M, Triplett Gilbert R, Nunn Martha E. Osseointegration of dental implants which were complexed with rhBMP-2: A comparative histomorphometric and radiographic evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(5): 667-678.
40. Maurya K, Dua JS, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Aggarwal A, Singh V. Polyetheretetherketone (PEEK) dental implants: A case for immediate loading. Int J Oral Impl Clin Res 2011; 2(2):97-103.
41. Nawab Al B, Pangen U, Duschner H, Krummenauer F, Wagner W. Turned, machined vs double etched dental implants in vivo. Clin Implant dent Rel Res 2007; 9(2):71-78.