Turned, machined versus double-etched dental implants in vivo

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 71-78

  Al Nawas, B ^a   Hangen, U ^a   Duschner, H ^a   Krummenauer, F ^b   Wagner, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical study; Dental implant; Resonance frequency analysis; Success; Surface

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CLASSIFICATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA BLEEDING; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIODONTICS; PERIODONTITIS; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMOKING; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PLAQUE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; COHORT STUDIES; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PLAQUE INDEX; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PERIODONTAL POCKET; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SMOKING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34547322680     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00030.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Al-Nawas B, Götz H. 3 D Topographical and metrological evaluation of dental implants by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Clin Oral Implants Dent Relat Res 2003 5 : 176 183.
2. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005 20 : 220 230.
3. Wagner W, Kunkel M, Wahlmann UW. Klasse D4 Knochen: Diagnostik, Probleme und Lösungsmöglichkeiten für Implantate in einem sehr spongiösen Knochenlager. Implantologie 1999 2 : 121 127.
4. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998 40 : 1 11.
5. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1999 19 : 117 129.
6. Moberg LE, Kondell PA, Sagulin GB, Bolin A, Heimdahl A, Gynther GW. Branemark System and ITI Dental Implant System for treatment of mandibular edentulism. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 12 : 450 461.
7. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 2 - review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004 17 : 544 564.
8. Esposito M, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. The role of implant surface modifications, shape and material on the success of osseointegrated dental implants. A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 2005 13 : 15 31.
9. Stach RM, Kohles SS. A meta-analysis examining the clinical survivability of machined-surfaced and Osseotite implants in poor-quality bone. Implant Dent 2003 12 : 87 96.
10. Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of AstraTech and Branemark System Implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002 13 : 30 37.
11. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS, Testori T, Galante J, Zetterqvist L. A prospective multicenter study evaluating loading of Osseotite implants two months after placement: one-year results. J Esthet Dent 1998 10 : 280 289.
12. Piattelli A, Corigliano M, Scarano A, Costigliola G, Paolantonio M. Immediate loading of titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a histologic analysis in monkeys. J Periodontol 1998 69 : 321 327.
13. Buser D, Mericske SR, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997 8 : 161 172.
14. Pebe P, Barbot R, Trinidad J, et al. Countertorque testing and histomorphometric analysis of various implant surfaces in canines: a pilot study. Implant Dent 1997 6 : 259 265.
15. Suzuki K, Aoki K, Ohya K. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits. Bone 1997 21 : 507 514.
16. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Ericson RA. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986 1 : 11.
17. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964 22 : 121 135.
18. Lindhe J. Textbook of clinical periodontology. Edited. Copenhagen, Denmark : Munksgaard, 1983.
19. Zechner W, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Watzek G. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003 18 : 873 878.
20. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Grondahl K. Astra Tech and Branemark System implants: a prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999 1 : 17 26.
21. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA, Visser A, Geertman ME, Van Oort RP. A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures; five-years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Branemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 11 : 441 447.
22. Richter E-J. Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme der deutschen Gesellschaft für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde: Implantologie in der Zahnheilkunde. Dtsch Zahnaerzil Z 2005 60 : 915 916.
23. Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998 13 : 253 262.
24. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991 62 : 2 4.
25. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 11 : 291 298.
26. Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003 18 : 417 423.
27. Feldman S, Boitel N, Weng D, Kohles SS, Stach RM. Five-year survival distributions of short-length (10 mm or less) machined-surfaced and Osseotite implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004 6 : 16 23.
28. Olson JW, Shernoff AF, Tarlow JL, Colwell JA, Scheetz JP, Bingham SF. Dental endosseous implant assessments in a type 2 diabetic population: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 15 : 811 818.
29. Gorman LM, Lambert PM, Morris HF, Ochi S, Winkler S. The effect of smoking on implant survival at second-stage surgery: DICRG Interim Report No. 5. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group. Implant Dent 1994 3 : 165 168.
30. Lambert PM, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of smoking on 3-year clinical success of osseointegrated dental implants. Ann Periodontol 2000 5 : 79 89.
31. Cooper L, Felton DA, Kugelberg CF, et al. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 16 : 182 192.
32. Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate functional loading of Branemark single tooth implants - an 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 11 : 26 33.