Strategies for human-in-the-loop robotic grasping

HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-8

  Leeper, Adam Eric ^a   Hsiao, Kaijen ^a   Ciocarlie, Matei ^a   Takayama, Leila ^a   Gossow, David ^b  

^a Willow Garage Inc   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

grasping; shared autonomy; teleoperation

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SKILL; COMPLEX TASK; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; GRASP PLANNING; GRASPING; HUMAN OPERATOR; HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP; PHYSICAL ROBOTS; REAL-TIME OPERATORS; ROBOTIC APPLICATIONS; ROBOTIC GRASPING; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; SHARED AUTONOMY; UNSTRUCTURED ENVIRONMENTS; UNTETHERED ROBOT; WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; REMOTE CONTROL; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84859994947     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2157689.2157691     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. A. Bettini, P. Marayong, S. Lang, A. Okamura, and G. Hager. Vision-Assisted Control for Manip. Using Virtual Fixtures. IEEE Trans. on Robotics, 20(6), 2004.
2. M. Ciocarlie, K. Hsiao, E. Jones, S. Chitta, R. Rusu, and I. Sucan. Towards reliable grasping and manipulation in household environments. In ISER, 2010.
3. H. Das. Kinematic Control and Visual Display of Redundant Teleoperators. PhD thesis, MIT, 1989.
4. W. Griffin, W. Provancher, and M. Cutkosky. Feedback Strategies for Telemanipulation with Shared Control of Object Handling Forces. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(6):720-731, Dec. 2005.
5. S. Hart. Nasa-task load index (nasa-tlx); 20 years later. In HFES, 2006.
6. S. Hayati and S. Venkataraman. Design and implementation of a robot control system with traded and shared control capability. In ICRA, 1989.
7. G. Hirzinger, B. Brunner, J. Dietrich, and J. Heindl. Sensor-Based Space Robotics-ROTEX and Its Telerobotic Features. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 9(5), 1993.
8. E. Horvitz. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In CHI, 1999.
9. K. Hsiao, S. Chitta, M. Ciocarlie, and E. Jones. Contact-reactive grasping of objects with partial shape information. In IROS, 2010.
10. J. Lee and K. See. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Erg. Society, 46(1):50-80, 2004. (Pubitemid 44490367)
11. P. Maes. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, pages 30-41, 1994.
12. M. Maybury. Intelligent user interfaces: An introduction. In IUI, pages 3-4, 1999.
13. P. Michelman and P. Allen. Shared autonomy in a robot hand teleoperation system. In IROS, 1994.
14. M. Oda, N. Inaba, Y. Takano, S. Nishida, M. Kayashi, and Y. Sugano. Onboard local compensation on ETS-W space robot teleoperation. In IEEE/ASME Intl. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, 1999.
15. M. K. O'Malley, A. Gupta, M. Gen, and Y. Li. Shared Control in Haptic Systems for Performance Enhancement and Training. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 128(1), 2006.
16. H. Pongrac, A. Peer, B. Farber, and M. Buss. Effects of varied human movement control on task performance and feeling of telepresence. In EuroHaptics, 2008.
17. J. Rotter. Generalized expectancies of internal versus external control for reinforcements. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1966.
18. S. Schneider and R. Cannon. Experimental object-level strategic control with cooperating manipulators. Intl. Journal of Robotics Research, 12(4), 1993.
19. T. Sheridan. Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
20. E. You and K. Hauser. Assisted Teleoperation Strategies for Aggressively Controlling a Robot Arm with 2D Input. In RSS, 2011.