Accuracy of multi-slice computed tomography for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Asferg, Camilla ^a   Usinger, Lotte ^a   Kristensen, Thomas S ^a   Abdulla, Jawdat ^a  

^a Mental Health Center Glostrup   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Left ventricular ejection fraction; Magnetic resonance imaging; Meta analysis; Multi slice computed tomography; Transthoracic echocardiography

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE VOLUME; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84859955504     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Shaw LJ, Peterson ED, Kesler K, Hasselblad V, Califf RM. A metaanalysis of predischarge risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction with stress electrocardiographic, myocardial perfusion, and ventricular function imaging. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:1327-37. (Pubitemid 126657223)
2. Taylor GJ, Humphries JO, Mellits ED, et al. Predictors of clinical course, coronary anatomy and left ventricular function after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1980;62:960-70. (Pubitemid 11225961)
3. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987;76:44-51. (Pubitemid 17093191)
4. Gordon EP, Schnittger I, Fitzgerald PJ, Williams P, Popp RL. Reproducibility of left ventricular volumes by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;2:506-13. (Pubitemid 13050027)
5. Otterstad JE, Froeland G, St John SM, Holme I. Accuracy and reproducibility of biplane two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimensions and function. Eur Heart J 1997;18:507-13.
6. Hombach V, Merkle N, Bernhard P, Rasche V, Rottbauer W. Prognostic significance of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: update 2010. Cardiol J 2010;17:549-57.
7. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, et al. 64-Multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2007;28:3042-50. (Pubitemid 350262259)
8. Abbara S, Chow BJ, Pena AJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function with 16- and 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2008;67:481-6.
9. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: a comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:480-7. (Pubitemid 44204142)
10. Kristensen TS, Kofoed KF, Moller DV, et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular systolic wall thickening using multidetector computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:92-7.
11. Boulmier D, Audinet C, Heautot JF, et al. Clinical contributions of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of cardiomyopathy of unknown origin. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2009;102:685-96.
12. Ko SM, Kim YJ, Park JH, Choi NM. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion with 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison with two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Br J Radiol 2010;83: 28-34.
13. Palazzuoli A, Cademartiri F, Geleijnse ML, et al. Left ventricular remodelling and systolic function measurement with 64 multi-slice computed tomography versus second harmonic echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease: a double blind study. Eur J Radiol 2010;73: 82-8.
14. Akram K, Anderson HD, Voros S. Quantification of left ventricular parameters obtained by automated software for 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:1154-60.
15. Palumbo A, Maffei E, Martini C, et al. Functional parameters of the left ventricle: comparison of cardiac MRI and cardiac CT in a large population. Radiol Med 2010;115:702-13.
16. van der Vleuten PA, de Jonge GJ, Lubbers DD, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment by dual-source computed tomography compared with MRI. Eur Radiol 2009;19:271-7.
17. Wu YW, Tadamura E, Kanao S, et al. Left ventricular functional analysis using 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with left ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Cardiology 2008;109:135-42.
18. van der Vleuten PA, Willems TP, Gotte MJ, et al. Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. A meta-analysis and review of the current literature. Acta Radiol 2006;47:1049-57. (Pubitemid 44838063)
19. Bastarrika G, Arraiza M, De Cecco CN, et al. Quantification of left ventricular function and mass in heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and MRI: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1784-90.
20. Brodoefel H, Kramer U, Reimann A, et al. Dual-source CT with improved temporal resolution in assessment of left ventricular function: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:1064-70. (Pubitemid 350032992)
21. Busch S, Johnson TR, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings. Eur Radiol 2008;18: 570-5. (Pubitemid 351248185)
22. Guo YK, Yang ZG, Ning G, et al. Sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of left ventricular function and mass in patients with mitral regurgitation: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2107-16.
23. Luders F, Fischbach R, Seifarth H, et al. Dual-source computed tomography: effect on regional and global left ventricular function assessment compared to magnetic resonance imaging. Rofo 2009;181:962-9.
24. Puesken M, Fischbach R, Wenker M, et al. Global left-ventricular function assessment using dual-source multidetector CT: effect of improved temporal resolution on ventricular volume measurement. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2087-94.
25. Sarwar A, Shapiro MD, Nasir K, et al. Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:170-7.
26. Schlosser T, Mohrs OK, Magedanz A, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol 2007;48:30-5. (Pubitemid 46324032)
27. Butler J, Shapiro MD, Jassal DS, et al. Comparison of multidetector computed tomography and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography for left ventricular assessment in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:247-9. (Pubitemid 46072765)
28. Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD, et al. Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 2008;248:466-75.
29. Ferencik M, Gregory SA, Butler J, et al. Analysis of cardiac dimensions, mass and function in heart transplant recipients using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007;26:478-84. (Pubitemid 46602013)
30. Jassal DS, Shapiro MD, Neilan TG, et al. 64-Slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity. Invest Radiol 2007;42:507-12. (Pubitemid 46955245)
31. Krishnam MS, Tomasian A, Iv M, et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction using 64-slice CT coronary angiography and new evaluation software: initial experience. Br J Radiol 2008;81:450-5. (Pubitemid 351957755)
32. Li X, Tang L, Zhou L, et al. Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:591-600.
33. Maffei E, Messalli G, Palumbo A, et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction: real-world comparison between cardiac computed tomography and echocardiography in a large population. Radiol Med 2010;115:1015-27.
34. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Trindade PT, et al. Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions and volumes: comparison between dual-source CT and echocardiography. Invest Radiol 2008;43:284-9. (Pubitemid 351572204)
35. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1908-15.