Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: Assessment with dual source computed tomography

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 591-600

  Li, Xiaofei ^a,b   Tang, Lijun ^a   Zhou, Lei ^a   Duan, Yuqing ^a   Yanhui, Sheng ^a   Yang, Rong ^a   Wu, Yanhu ^a   Kong, Xiangqing ^a  

^a NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Aortic regurgitation; Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve area; Computed tomography; Echocardiography; Regurgitant orifice area

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AORTA ROOT; AORTA SINUS; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DUAL SOURCE COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE END SYSTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RADIATION DOSE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRICUSPID AORTIC VALVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67849097325     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-009-9456-z     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bonow R, Carabello B (1998) Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. ACC/AHA guidelines. Circulation 98:1949-1984
2. Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, Hatle L (1985) Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 72:810-818
3. Zoghbi WA, Farmer KL, Soto JG, Nelson JG, Quinones MA (1986) Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 73:452-459
4. Zogbhi WA, Enriquez-Sorano M, Foster E et al (2004) American Society of Echocardiography: Recommendations for evaluation for the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777-802
5. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobsructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147-154. doi: 10.1016/ j.jacc.2005.03.071
6. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318-2323. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.533471
7. Raff GL, Gallaugher MJ, O'Neill WW, Gold-stein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552-557. doi: 10.1016/ j.jacc.2005.05.056
8. Juergens KU, Grude M, Mlaintz D et al (2004) Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: Initial experience. Radiology 230:403-410. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.2302030042
9. Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B et al (2006) Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 151:736-744. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.029
10. Rubin GD, Paik DS, Johnston PC, Napel S (1998) Measurement of the aorta and its branches with helical CT. Radiology 206:823-829
11. Pouleur AC, Le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A et al (2007) Aortic valve area assessment: Multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 244(3):745-754. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443061127
12. Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L et al (2007) Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT. Radiology 245:111-121. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.2451061523
13. Jassal DS, Shapiro MD, Neilan TG et al (2007) 64-Slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity. Invest Radiol 42:507-512. doi: 10.1097/ RLI.0b013e3180375556
14. Matt D, Scheffel H, Leschka S et al (2007) Dual-source CT coronary angiography: Image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):567-573
15. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16(12):2739-2747. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0474-0
16. Zogbhi WA, Enriquez-Sorano M, Foster E et al (2003) American Society of Echocardiography: Recommendations for evaluation for the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777-802
17. Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ (1996) Clinical practice: Aortic regurgitation. N Engl J Med 351:1539-1546. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp030912
18. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Friedrich GJ et al (2006) Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1410-1417. doi: 10.1016/ j.jacc.2005.11.056
19. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A et al (2006) Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 239:924-932
20. John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR et al (2003) Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: How does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 42(3):519-526. doi: 10.1016/ S0735-1097(03)00707-1
21. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G et al (2004) Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 90(8):893-901. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.022376
22. Baumert B, Plass A, Bettex D et al (2005) Dynamic cine mode imaging of the normal aortic valve using 16-channel multidetector row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 40(10):637-647. doi: 10.1097/ 01.rli.0000178363.79489.ef
23. Feuchtner GM, Müller S, Bonatti J et al (2007) Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. Am J Roentgenol 189(1):197-203. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2069
24. Habis M, Daoud B, Roger VL, Ghostine S, Caussin C, Ramadan R, Nottin R, Lancelin B, Angel CY, Capderou A, Paul JF (2007) Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planimetry and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 16(3):216-224
25. DeGroff CG, Shandas R, Valdes-Cruz L et al (1988) Analysis of the effect of flow rate on the Doppler continuity equation for stenotic orifice area calculations: A numerical study. Circulation 97(16):1597-1605
26. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Müller S et al (2008) 64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 191(1):W1-7
27. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Schachner T et al (2006) Diagnostic performance of MDCT for detecting aortic valve regurgitation. Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1676-1681. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0967
28. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 1:321-330
29. Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M et al (2003) Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: A prospective, randomised study. Lancet 361:1241-1246. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12978-9
30. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A et al (2002) Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: First human case description. Circulation 106:3006-3008. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000047200.36165.B8
31. Rosengart TK, Feldman T, Borger MA et al (2008) Percutaneous and minimally invasive valve procedures. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Group, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation 117:1750-1767. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188525
32. Grube E, Schuler G, Buellesfeld L et al (2007) Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: Device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.047