Left ventricular functional analysis using 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography: Comparison with left ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Cardiology

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 135-142

  Wu, Yen Wen ^a   Tadamura, Eiji ^a   Kanao, Shotaro ^a   Yamamuro, Masaki ^a   Okayama, Satoshi ^b   Ozasa, Neiko ^a   Toma, Masanao ^a   Kimura, Takeshi ^a   Kita, Toru ^a   Marui, Akira ^a   Komeda, Masashi ^a   Togashi, Kaori ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Computed tomography; Ejection fraction; Left ventriculography; Regional wall motion

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL;

ADULT; AGED; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HEART DISEASE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART VENTRICLE WALL MOTION; HEART VENTRICULOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTOLE;

AGED; FEMALE; GATED BLOOD-POOL IMAGING; HEART DISEASES; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 37849043103     PISSN: 00086312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000105555     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. The Multicenter Postinfarction Research Group: Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1983;309:331-336.
2. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PW, Whitlock RM, Wild CJ: Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987;76:44-51.
3. Emond M, Mock MB, Davis KB, et al: Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation 1994;90:2645-2657.
4. Brener SJ, Lytle BW, Casserly IP, Ellis SG, Topol EJ, Lauer MS: Predictors of revascularization method and long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention or repeat coronary bypass surgery in patients with multivessel coronary disease and previous coronary bypass surgery. Eur Heart J 2006;27:413-418.
5. Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al: Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance: are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J 2000;21:1387-1396.
6. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al: High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318-2323.
7. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al: Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147-154.
8. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, et al: Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:672-677.
9. Mahnken AH, Spuentrup E, Niethammer M, et al: Quantitative and qualitative assessment of left ventricular volume with ECG-gated multislice spiral CT: value of different imaging reconstruction algorithms in comparison to MRI. Acta Radiol 2003;44:604-611.
10. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, et al: Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT and MR imaging. Radiology 2005;234:381-390.
11. Dewey M, Muller M, Teige F, et al: Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for assessment of regional and global left ventricular function. Invest Radiol 2006;41:400-409.
12. Mahnken AH, Hohl C, Suess C, et al: Influence of heart rate and temporal resolution on left-ventricular volumes in cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography: a phantom study. Invest Radiol 2006;41:429-435.
13. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kanao S, et al: Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser: influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation. J Comput Assist Tomogr, in press.
14. Juergens KU, Fischbach R: Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 2006;16:342-357.
15. Tadamura E, Kudoh T, Motooka M, et al: Assessment of regional and global left ventricular function by reinjection Tl-201 SPECT and rest Tc-99m sestamibi ECG-gated SPECT. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:991-997.
16. Tadamura E, Kudoh T, Motooka M, et al: Use of technetium-99m sestamibi ECG-gated single-photon emission tomography for the evaluation of left ventricular function following coronary artery bypass graft: comparison with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:705-712.
17. Tadamura E, Yamamuro M, Kubo S, et al: Effectiveness of delayed enhanced MRI for identification of cardiac sarcoidosis: comparison with radionuclide imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:110-115.
18. Yamashita K, Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, et al: Quantitative analysis of regional wall motion by gated myocardial positron emission tomography: validation and comparison with left ventriculography. J Nucl Med 1989;30:1775-1786.
19. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al: Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. Circulation 2002;105:539-542.
20. Toba M, Ishida Y, Jukuchi K, et al: Use of ECG-gated SPET to assess the evolution of perfusion after acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27:517-523.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
22. Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, et al: Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1545-1550.
23. Hosoi S, Mochizuki T, Miyagawa M, Shen Y, Murase K, Ikezoe J: Assessment of left ventricular volumes using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT): phantom and human study. Radiat Med 2003;21:62-67.
24. Hundt W, Siebert K, Wintersperger BJ, et al: Assessment of global left ventricular function: comparison of cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography with angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:371-381.
25. Dirksen MS, Jukema W, Bax JJ, et al: Cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with unstable angina. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:457-461.
26. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Salm LP, et al: Non-invasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:571-574.
27. Kim TH, Hur J, Kim SJ, et al: Two-phase reconstruction for the assessment of left ventricular volume and function using retrospective ECG-gated MDCT: comparison with echocardiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:319-325.
28. Lessick J, Mutlak D, Rispler S, et al: Comparison of multidetector computed tomography versus echocardiography for assessing regional left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:1011-1015.
29. Heuschmid M, Rothfuss JK, Schroeder S, et al: Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 2006;16:551-559.
30. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al: Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2004;230:403-410.
31. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al: Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 2005;15:714-720.
32. Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P, et al: Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging - study in pigs. Radiology 2005;236:112-117.
33. Reman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK: Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2006;151:736-744.
34. Belge B, Coche E, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL: Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1424-1433.
35. Kim IJ, Choo KS, Lee JS, et al: Comparison of gated blood pool SPECT and multi-detector row computed tomography for measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with atypical chest pain: validation with radionuclide ventriculography. Cardiology 2007;107:8-16.
36. Henneman MM, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD, et al: Global and regional ventricular function: a comparison between gated SPECT, 2D echocardiography and multi-slice computed tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:1452-1460.
37. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema W, et al: Assessment of global and regional ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: a comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:480-487.
38. Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, et al: Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance. Circulation 2006;114:654-661.