Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: A comparison with 2D echocardiography

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 480-487

  Henneman, Maureen M ^a   Schuijf, Joanne D ^a,b   Jukema, J Wouter ^a,b   Holman, Eduard R ^a   Lamb, Hildo J ^a   de Roos, Albert ^a   van der Wall, Ernst E ^a,b   Bax, Jeroen J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

echocardiography; left ventricular function; Multislice computed tomography

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AKINESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DYSKINESIA; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE WALL MOTION; HUMAN; HYPOKINESIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE VOLUME; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 33747022502     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. White H.D., Norris R.M., Brown M.A., Brandt P.W., Whitlock R.M., and Wild C.J. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 76 (1987) 44-51
2. Vourvouri E.C., Poldermans D., Bax J.J., Sianos G., Sozzi F.B., Schinkel A.F., et al. Evaluation of left ventricular function and volumes in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus two-dimensional echocardiography. Eur J Nucl Med 28 (2001) 1610-1615
3. van der Wall E.E., Vliegen H.W., de Roos A., and Bruschke A.V. Magnetic resonance imaging in coronary artery disease. Circulation 92 (1995) 2723-2739
4. Starling M.R., Crawford M.H., Sorensen S.G., Levi B., Richards K.L., and O'Rourke R.A. Comparative accuracy of apical biplane cross-sectional echocardiography and gated equilibrium radionuclide angiography for estimating left ventricular size and performance. Circulation 63 (1981) 1075-1084
5. Achenbach S., Giesler T., Ropers D., Ulzheimer S., Derlien H., Schulte C., et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103 (2001) 2535-2538
6. Nieman K., Rensing B.J., van Geuns R.J., Vos J., Pattynama P.M., Krestin G.P., et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography. impact of heart rate. Heart 88 (2002) 470-474
7. Schuijf J.D., Bax J.J., Salm L.P., Jukema J.W., Lamb H.J., van der Wall E.E., et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 95 (2005) 571-574
8. Dirksen M.S., Bax J.J., de Roos A., Jukema J.W., van der Geest R.J., Geleijns K., et al. Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 90 (2002) 1157-1160
9. Juergens K.U., Grude M., Fallenberg E.M., Opitz C., Wichter T., Heindel W., et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 1545-1550
10. Juergens K.U., Grude M., Maintz D., Fallenberg E.M., Wichter T., Heindel W., et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging. initial experience. Radiology 230 (2004) 403-410
11. Salm L.P., Schuijf J.D., de Roos A., Lamb H.J., Vliegen H.W., Jukema J.W., et al. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT. comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Echocardiogr 7 (2006) 308-314
12. Cerqueira M.D., Weissman N.J., Dilsizian V., Jacobs A.K., Kaul S., Laskey W.K., et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105 (2002) 539-542
13. Schiller N.B., Acquatella H., Ports T.A., Drew D., Goerke J., Ringertz H., et al. Left ventricular volume from paired biplane two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 60 (1979) 547-555
14. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
15. Fleiss J.L. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. (1981), Wiley, New York 218
16. Santana C.A., Shaw L.J., Garcia E.V., Soler-Peter M., Candell-Riera J., Grossman G.B., et al. Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular function by myocardial ECG-gated FDG PET imaging in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Nucl Cardiol 11 (2004) 542-550
17. Sharir T., Germano G., Kavanagh P.B., Lai S., Cohen I., Lewin H.C., et al. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 100 (1999) 1035-1042
18. Heuschmid M., Rothfuss J.K., Schroeder S., Fenchel M., Stauder N., Burgstahler C., et al. Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography. comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 551-559
19. Kim T.H., Hur J., Kim S.J., Kim H.S., Choi B.W., Choe K.O., et al. Two-phase reconstruction for the assessment of left ventricular volume and function using retrospective ECG-gated MDCT. comparison with echocardiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 (2005) 319-325
20. Malm S., Frigstad S., Sagberg E., Larsson H., and Skjaerpe T. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography. a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) 1030-1035
21. Lim T.K., Burden L., Janardhanan R., Ping C., Moon J., Pennell D., et al. Improved accuracy of low-power contrast echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricular remodeling compared with unenhanced harmonic echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction. comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18 (2005) 1203-1207
22. Yamamuro M., Tadamura E., Kubo S., Toyoda H., Nishina T., Ohba M., et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm. comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology 234 (2005) 381-390