Functional Outcomes for 2 Years Comparing Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  MacKenzie, James R ^a   O'Connor, Gregory J ^a   Marshall, Deborah A ^a   Faris, Peter D ^a   Dort, Leslie C ^a   Khong, Hoa ^a   Parker, Robyn D ^a   Werle, Jason R ^a   Beaupre, Lauren A ^a   Frank, Cyril B ^a  

^a Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Outcomes; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 84859909174     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Yue E.J., Cabanela M.E., Duffy G.P., et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:992.
2. Quesada M.J., Marker D.R., Mont M.A. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23((7:Suppl):Suppl-73). [Review] [29 refs].
3. Nunley R.M., la Valle C.J., Barrack R.L. Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:56. [Review] [92 refs].
4. Buergi M.L., Walter W.L. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22((7:Suppl 3):Suppl-5). [see comment]. [Review] [13 refs].
5. Della Valle C.J., Nunley R.M., Raterman S.J., et al. Initial american experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:72.
6. Shimmin A., Beaule P.E., Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:637. [Review] [142 refs].
7. Pandit H., Glyn-Jones S., McLardy-Smith P., et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:847.
8. Springer B.D., Connelly S.E., Odum S.M., et al. Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(6 Suppl):2.
9. Engh C.A., MacDonald S.J., Sritulanondha S., et al. 2008 John Charnley award: metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:101.
10. Vendittoli P.A., Mottard S., Roy A.G., et al. Chromium and cobalt ion release following the Durom high carbon content, forged metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:441.
11. Vendittoli P.A., Lavigne M., Roy A.G., et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old. Hip Int 16 Suppl 2006, 4:73.
12. Fowble V.A., dela Rosa M.A., Schmalzried T.P. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty-patients and outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009, 67:108.
13. Mont M.A., Schmalzried T.P. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl-11).
14. Gooch K.L., Smith D., Wasylak T., et al. The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009, 25:113.
15. Australian Orthopaedic Association Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Registry Annual Report 2009, Adelaide.
16. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833.
17. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473.
18. Clark D.O., Von K.M., Saunders K., et al. A chronic disease score with empirically derived weights. Med Care 1995, 33:783.
19. Bachmeier C.J., March L.M., Cross M.J., et al. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001, 9:137.
20. Angst F., Ewert T., Lehmann S., et al. The factor subdimensions of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) help to specify hip and knee osteoarthritis. a prospective evaluation and validation study. J Rheumatol 2005, 32:1324.
21. Feeny D., Blanchard C.M., Mahon J.L., et al. The stability of utility scores: test-retest reliability and the interpretation of utility scores in elective total hip arthroplasty. Qual Life Res 2004, 13:15.
22. Mahomed N.N., Liang M.H., Cook E.F., et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002, 29:1273.
23. Canadian Patient Safety Institute Canadian disclosure guidelines 2008, Canadian Patient Safety Institute, Edmonton, Alberta.
24. Rosenbaum P., Rubin D. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983, 70:44.
25. Little R.J., Rubin D.B. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. Annu Rev Public Health 2000, 21:121.
26. Austin P.C. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med 2008, 27:2037.
27. Leuven E., Sianesi B. "psmatch2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing" version 3.1.5 http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.
28. Brown H., Prescott R. Applied mixed models in medicine 2006, Wiley, Chischester, West Sussex, England.
29. Jones C.A., Voaklander D.C., Johnston D.W., et al. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 2000, 27:1745.
30. Jones C.A., Voaklander D.C., Johnston D.W., et al. The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med 2001, 161:454.
31. Laupacis A., Bourne R., Rorabeck C., et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993, 75:1619.
32. Rissanen P., Aro S., Sintonen H., et al. Costs and cost-effectiveness in hip and knee replacements. A prospective study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997, 13:575.
33. Murphy T.P., Trousdale R.T., Pagnano M.W., et al. Patients' perceptions of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2009, 32:730.
34. Quintana J.M., Escobar A., Arostegui I., et al. Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip joint replacement. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166:220.
35. Marx R.G., Jones E.C., Atwan N.C., et al. Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1999.
36. Lingard E.A., Muthumayandi K., Holland J.P. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:1550.
37. Mont M.A., Marker D.R., Smith J.M., et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:66.
38. Pollard T.C., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:592.
39. Jameson S.S., Langton D.J., Natu S., et al. The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an independent center analysis. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23((6:Suppl 1):Suppl-5).