Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Cowan, Rachel E ^a   Fregly, Benjamin J ^b   Boninger, Michael L ^c,h   Chan, Leighton ^d   Rodgers, Mary M ^e,f   Reinkensmeyer, David J ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; Disability; Robotics

Indexed keywords

DISABLED PERSON; EUROPE; HUMAN; REVIEW; SELF HELP; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

DISABLED PERSONS; EUROPE; HUMANS; MOBILITY LIMITATION; SELF-HELP DEVICES;

EID: 84859903668     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-20     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Thermoregulation in multiple sclerosis. Davis SL, Wilson TE, White AT, Frohman EM, J Appl Physiol 2010 109 5 1531 1537 10.1152/japplphysiol.00460.2010 20671034
2. From disablement to enablement: conceptual models of disability in the 20th century. Masala C, Petretto DR, Disabil Rehabil 2008 30 17 1233 1244 10.1080/09638280701602418 18821191
3. World Health Organization, Towards a common language for functioning, disability, and health, 2002 http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/ icfbeginnersguide.pdf
4. Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Boninger ML, J Neuroeng Rehab 2011
5. Combining Brain-Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: state-of-the-Art and Challenges. Millan JD, Rupp R, Muller-Putz GR, Murray-Smith R, Giugliemma C, Tangermann M, et al. Front Neurosci 2010 4 1 15 20582256
6. Evaluation of a collaborative wheelchair system in cerebral palsy and traumatic brain injury users. Zeng Q, Burdet E, Teo CL, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 5 494 504 10.1177/1545968308323692 19074687
7. Clinical evaluation of wireless inductive tongue computer interface for control of computers and assistive devices. Lontis ER, Lund ME, Christensen HV, Bentsen B, Gaihede M, Caltenco HA, et al. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010 2010 3365 3368 21097236
8. Evaluation of a wireless wearable tongue-computer interface by individuals with high-level spinal cord injuries. Huo X, Ghovanloo M, J Neural Eng 2010 7 2 26008 10.1088/1741-2560/7/2/026008 20332552
9. Functional reorganization of upper-body movement after spinal cord injury. Casadio M, Pressman A, Fishbach A, Danziger Z, Acosta S, Chen D, et al. Exp Brain Res 2010 207 3-4 233 247 20972779
10. Berger TW, Chapin JK, Gerhardt GA, McFarland DJ, Principe JC, Soussou WV, et al. Brain-Computer Interfaces: An International Assessment of Research and Development Trends World Technology Evalution Center, 2008
11. A brain controlled wheelchair to navigate in familiar environments. Rebsamen B, Guan C, Zhang H, Wang C, Teo C, Ang MH, et al. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010 18 6 590 598 20460212
12. Cognitive vision system for control of dexterous prosthetic hands: experimental evaluation. Dosen S, Cipriani C, Kostic M, Controzzi M, Carrozza MC, Popovic DB, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010 7 42 10.1186/1743-0003-7-42 20731834
13. Transradial prosthesis: artificial vision for control of prehension. Dosen S, Popovic DB, Artif Organs 2011 35 1 37 48 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010. 01040.x 20618232
14. Decoding information from neural signals recorded using intraneural electrodes: toward the development of a neurocontrolled hand prosthesis. Micera S, Citi L, Rigosa J, Carpaneto J, Raspopovic S, Di Pino G, et al. Proc IEEE 2010 98 3 407 417
15. On the control of a robot hand by extracting neural signals from the PNS: preliminary results from a human implantation. Micera S, Rigosa J, Carpaneto J, Citi L, Raspopovic S, Guglielmelli E, et al. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009 2009 4586 4589 19963845
16. Complementary limb motion estimation for the control of active knee prostheses. Vallery H, Burgkart R, Hartmann C, Mitternacht J, Riener R, Buss M, Biomed Tech (Berl) 2011 56 1 45 51
17. Gait analysis in prosthetics: opinions, ideas and conclusions. Rietman JS, Postema K, Geertzen JHB, Prosthet Orthotic Int 2002 26 50 57 10.1080/03093640208726621
18. Ability to hold grasped objects by underactuated hands: Performance prediction and experiments. Kragten GA, Kool AC, Herder JL, 2009 2493 2498
19. Tremor Project, An ambulatory BCI-driven tremor supression system based on functional eletrical stimulation, http://www iai csic es/tremor/ 2011Available from: URL: http://www.iai.csic.es/tremor/
20. Rehabilitation exoskeletal robotics. The promise of an emerging field. Pons JL, IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2010 29 3 57 63 20659858
21. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Phillips B, Zhao H, Assist Technol 1993 5 1 36 45 10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205 10171664
22. Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury. Kittel A, Di MA, Stewart H, Disabil Rehabil 2002 24 1-3 106 114 11827144 (Pubitemid 34105682)
23. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Biddiss E, Chau T, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007 86 12 977 987 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181587f6c 18090439 (Pubitemid 350307459)
24. Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. McFarland LV, Hubbard Winkler SL, Heinemann AW, Jones M, Esquenazi A, J Rehabil Res Dev 2010 47 4 299 316 10.1682/JRRD.2009.03.0027 20803400
25. Biologically based design of an actuator system for a knee-ankle-foot orthosis. Cullell A, Moreno JC, Rocon E, Forner-Cordero A, Pons JL, Mech and Machine Theory 2009 44 4 860 872 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.04.001
26. Immediate effects of a controllable knee ankle foot orthosis for functional compensation of gait in patients with proximal leg weakness. Moreno JC, Brunetti F, Rocon E, Pons JL, Med Biol Eng Comput 2008 46 1 43 53 10.1007/s11517-007-0267-x 17926076
27. Long-term therapeutic and orthotic effects of a foot drop stimulator on walking performance in progressive and nonprogressive neurological disorders. Stein RB, Everaert DG, Thompson AK, Chong SL, Whittaker M, Robertson J, et al. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 2 152 167 10.1177/1545968309347681 19846759
28. Mobility of the human ankle and the design of total ankle replacement. Leardini A, OConnor JJ, Catani F, Giannini S, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 424 39 46 15241142 (Pubitemid 38890855)
29. Biomechanics of double transtibial amputee sprinting using dedicated sprint prostheses. Bruggeman GP, Arampatzis A, Emrich F, Potthast W, Sports Technol 2009 4-5 220 227
30. Counterpoint: artificial legs do not make artificially fast running speeds possible. Kram R, Grabowski AM, McGowan CP, Brown MB, Herr HM, J Appl Physiol 2010 108 4 1012 1014 10.1152/japplphysiol.01238.2009a 20368386
31. Running-specific prostheses permit energy cost similar to nonamputees. Brown MB, Millard-Stafford ML, Allison AR, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 41 5 1080 1087 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181923cee 19346979
32. The fastest runner on artificial legs: different limbs, similar function? Weyand PG, Bundle MW, McGowan CP, Grabowski A, Brown MB, Kram R, et al. J Appl Physiol 2009 107 3 903 911 10.1152/japplphysiol.00174.2009 19541739