Transradial Prosthesis: Artificial Vision for Control of Prehension

Artificial Organs

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 37-48

  Došen, Strahinja ^a   Popović, Dejan B ^a,b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b School of Electrical Engineering University of Belgrade   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Computer vision; Control; Prehension; Transradial prosthesis

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; PROSTHETICS; REAL TIME CONTROL;

ARTIFICIAL HAND; DISTANCE SENSORS; HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; PRACTICAL SYSTEMS; PREHENSION; REAL-TIME IMPLEMENTATIONS; SIMPLE++; TARGET OBJECT; TRANSRADIAL PROSTHESIS; WEB CAMERA;

COMPUTER VISION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; HAND GRIP; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS;

EID: 77956882946     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01040.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Zollo L, Roccella S, Guglielmelli E, Carrozza MC, Dario P. Biomechatronic design and control of an anthropomorphic artificial hand for prosthetic and robotic applications. IEEE Trans Mechatr 2007;12:418-29.
2. Chapell PH, Cranny A, Cotton DPJ, White NM, Beeby SP. Sensory motor systems of artificial and natural hands. Int J Surg 2007;5:435-40.
3. Zecca M, Micera S, Carrozza MC, Dario P. Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2002;30:459-85.
4. Schlesinger G. Der Mechanisce Aufbau der kunstlischen Glieder. In: Borchardt M, ed. Ersatzglieder und Arbeitshilfen fur Kriegsbeshadigte und Unfallverletzte. Berlin: Springer, 1991;21-600.
5. Arbib MA. Schemas for the temporal control of behavior. Hum Neurobiol 1985;4:63-72.
6. Iberall T, MacKenzie CL. Opposition space and human prehension. In: Venkataraman ST, Iberall T, eds. Dexterous Robot Hands. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990;32-54.
7. Iberall T, Bingham G, Arbib MA. Opposition space as a structuring concept for the analysis of skilled hand movements. In: Heuer H, Fromm C, eds. Generation and Modulation of Action Pattern. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1986;158-73.
8. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Jeannerod M. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. I. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 1991;83:502-12.
9. Jeannerod M. The hand and the object: the role of posterior parietal cortex in forming motor representations. J Physiol Pharmacol 1993;72:535-41.
10. MacKenzie CL, Iberall T. The grasping hand. In: Stelmach GE, Vroon PA, eds. Advances in Psychology Series, Vol. 104. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V., 1994.
11. Li Z-M, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM. Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem. Exp Brain Res 1998;119:276-86.
12. Jeannerod M. Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A, eds. Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1981;153-68.
13. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J Motor Behav 1984;16:235-54.
14. Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C. Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Motor Behav 1986;18:245-60.
15. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M. Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 1987;41:365-78.
16. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Leavitt JL. The inadequacies of a straight physical account of motor control. In: Whiting HTA, Meijer OG, van Wieringen PCW, eds. The Natural-Physical Approach to Movement Control. Amsterdam: Free Univ Press, 1990;95-115.
17. Gentilucci M, Castiello U, Corradini ML, Scarpa M, Umilta C, Rizzolatti G. Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neurophys 1991;29:361-78.
18. SmartHand project [Internet]. Available at: Accessed March 31, 2010.
19. Carrozza MC, Cappiello G, Micera S, Edin BB, Beccai L, Cipriani C. Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and action. Biol Cybern 2006;95:629-44.
20. Gonzales ARC, Woods RE. Digital Image Processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 2002.
21. Trucco E, Veri A. Introductory Techniques for 3-D Computer Vision. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1998.
22. Bouguet J-Y. Camera calibration toolbox for Matlab [Internet]. Available at: Accessed March 31, 2010.
23. Cotton DPJ, Cranny A, Chappell PM, White NM, Beeby SP. Control strategies for a multiple degree of freedom prosthetic hand. Meas Control 2007;40:24-7.
24. Otto Bock Healthcare. Upper extremity prosthetics [Internet]. Available at: Accessed March 31, 2010.
25. Popović DB, Sinkjær T. Control of Movement for the Physically Disabled, 1st Edition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
26. Wang X, Ishii K. Depth perception using a monocular vision system. In: Köppen M, Kasabov N, Coghill G, eds. Advances in Neuro-Information Processing. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2009;779-86.
27. Cipriani C, Controzzi M, Carrozza MC. Objectives, criteria and methods for the design of the SmartHand transradial prosthesis. Robotica, published online, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 16 Dec 2009, doi:10.1017/S0263574709990750.
28. RobotShop. High-end scanning lasers [Internet]. Available at: Accessed March 31, 2010.
29. Mesa Imaging AG. SwissRanger SR4000 Overview [Internet]. Available at: Accessed March 31, 2010.
30. Cutkosky MR. On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 1989;5:269-79.
31. Lazaros N, Sirakoulis GC, Gasteratos A. Review of stereo vision algorithms: from software to hardware. Int J Optomech 2008;2:435-62.
32. Schechner YY, Kiryati N. Depth from defocus vs. stereo: how different really are they? Int J Comput Vision 2000;39:141-62.
33. Smolka B, Venetsanopoulos AN. Noise reduction and edge detection in color images. In: Lukac R, Plataniotis KN, eds. Color Image Processing: Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2007;75-100.
34. Palus H. Color image segmentation: selected techniques. In: Lukac R, Plataniotis KN, eds. Color Image Processing: Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2007;103-28.