Phylogeny of Lundia (Bignoniaceae) based on ndhF and PepC sequences

Taxon

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 368-380

  Kaehler, Miriam ^a   Michelangeli, Fabián A ^b   Lohmann, Lúcia G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTE OF SYSTEMATIC BOTANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bignoniaceae; Bignonieae; Lundia; Molecular and morphological characters; Phylogeny reconstruction

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SHRUB;

BIGNONIACEAE; NITIDULA;

EID: 84859878104     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.612008     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baillon, H. 1888 (1891). Bignoniacées. Pp. 1-58 in: Historie de plantes, vol. 10. Paris: Librairie Hachette.
2. Bureau, E. 1868. Revisión des genres Tynathus et Lundia. Adansonia 8: 270-294.
3. Bureau, E. & Schumann, K. 1897. Lundia. Pp 234-245 in: Martius, C.F.P. von (ed.), Flora brasiliensis, vol. 8 pt. 2 fasc. 121. Munich, Leipzig: apud Fried. Fleischer.
4. Candolle, A.P. de 1838. Revue sommaire de la famille des Bignoniacées. Biblioth. Universèlle Genève 17(2): 120-140.
5. Candolle, A.P. de 1845. Bignoniaceae. Pp. 142-248 in: Prodromus systematis, naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 9. Paris: Masson.
6. Cunningham, C.W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molec. Biol. Evol. 14: 733-740.
7. Ellis, B., Daly, D.C., Hickey, I.J., Mitchell, J.D., Johnson, K.R., Wilf, P. & Wing, S.L. 2009. Manual of leaf architecture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
8. Emshwiller, E. & Doyle, J.J. 1999. Chloroplast-expressed Glutamine Synthetase (ncpGS): Potential utility for phylogenetic studies with an example from Oxalis (Oxalidaceae). Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 12: 310-319.
9. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G. & Bult, C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
10. Fischer, E., Theisen, I. & Lohmann, L.G. 2004. Bignoniaceae. Pp. 9-38 in: Kadereit, J.W. (ed.), The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 7. Heidelberg: Springer.
11. Garrick, R.C., Meadows, C.A., Nicolas, A.N., Nason, J.D. & Dyer, R.J. 2008. A set of polymorphic nuclear intron markers for conservation genetics and phylogeography of Euphorbia species (Pedilanthus clade). Conservation Genet. 9: 1673-1679.
12. Gaskin, J.F. & Schaal, B.A. 2002. Hybrid Tamarix widespread in U.S. invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 11256-11259.
13. Gentry, A.H. 1977. Studies in Bignoniaceae 25: New species and combinations in South American Bignoniaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64: 311-319.
14. Gentry, A.H. 1980. Bignoniaceae-part I (Crescentieae and Tourrettieae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 25. Bronx, New York: New York Botanical Garden.
15. Goloboff, P. 1999. NONA, version 2. Tucumán, Argentina: published by the author. http://www.cladistics.com/Downloads.html.
16. Hörandl, E. & Stuessy, T.F. 2010. Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification. Taxon 59: 1641-1653.
17. Kaehler, M. 2011. A new species of Lundia (Bignoniaceae) from the Brazilian Amazon. Brittonia 63: 461-464.
18. Katoh, K., Asimenos, G. & Toh, H. 2009. Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Meth. Molec. Biol. 537: 39-64.
19. Kunth, K.S. 1819. Bignoniaceae. Pp. 132-154 in: Humboldt, A., Bonpland, A. & Kunth, K.S., Nova genera et species plantarum, vol. 3 pt. 10-11. Paris: sumptibus librariae graeco-latini-germanicae.
20. Lewis, P.O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50: 913-925.
21. Linder, C.R., Goertzen, L.R., Heuvel, B.V., Francisco-Ortega, J., & Jansen, R.K. 2000. The complete external transcribed spacer of 18S-26S rDNA: Amplification and phylogenetic utility at low taxonomic levels in Asteraceae and closely allied families. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 14: 285-303.
22. Little, D.P. 2005. 2xread: A simple indel coding tool. Program distributed by the author. http://www.nybg.org/files/scientists/2xread.html (accessed 20 Oct. 2010).
23. Lohmann, L.G. 2003. Phylogeny, classification, morphological diversification and biogeography of Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae, Lamiales). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis.
24. Lohmann, L.G. 2006. Untangling the phylogeny of Neotropical lianas (Bignonieae, Bignoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 93: 304-318.
25. Lohmann, L.G. In press. A new classification of Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae) based on a molecular phylogeny and morphological synapomorphies. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 98.
26. Lohmann, L.G. & Ulloa, C.U. 2006 onwards. Bignoniaceae in iPlants prototype Checklist. http://www.iplants.org (accessed 20 Oct. 2010).
27. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2009. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.6. http://mesquiteproject.org (accessed 15 May 2010).
28. Nicolas, A.N. & Plunkett, G.M. 2009. The demise of subfamily Hydrocotyloideae (Apiaceae) and the re-alignment of its genera across the entire order Apiales. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 53: 134-151.
29. Nixon, K.C. 1999. WinClada, version 1.0. Ithaca, New York: published by the author. http://www.cladistics.com/Downloads.html (accessed 10 May 2010).
30. Olmstead, R.G. & Sweere, J.A. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular datasets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43: 467-481.
31. Olmstead, R.G., Zjhra, M.L., Lohmann, L.G., Grose, S.O. & Eckert, A.J. 2009. A molecular phylogeny of Bignoniaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 96: 1731-1743.
32. Pinna, M.C.C. de 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7: 367-394.
33. Pleijel, F. 1995. On character coding for phylogeny reconstruction. Cladistics 11: 309-315.
34. Posada, D. 2008. ModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molec. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253-1256.
35. Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. 2007. Tracer, version 1.5. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer (accessed 20 Oct. 2010).
36. Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Van der Mark, P. 2005. MrBayes, version 3.2. http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/download.php (accessed 20 Oct. 2010).
37. Schumann, K. 1895. Bignoniaceae. Pp. 189-252 in: Engler, A., & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 4(3). Leipzig: Engelmann.
38. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.B., Liu, W., Miller, J., Siripun, K.C., Winder, C.T., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R.L. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 142-166.
39. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R.L. 2007. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: The tortoise and the hare III. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 275-288.
40. Shimodaira, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51: 492-508.
41. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of loglikelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molec. Biol. Evol. 16: 1114-1116.
42. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. 2001. CONSEL: For assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17: 1246-1247.
43. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence- based phylogeny analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
44. Sonder, O.W. 1849. Plantae Regnelianae. Linnaea 22: 561.
45. Stearn, W.T. 2004. Botanical Latin, 5th ed. Portland: Timber Press.
46. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
47. Templeton, A.R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of human and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
48. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molec. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596-1599.
49. Tronchet, F., Plunkett, G.M., Jeremie, J. & Lowry II, P.P. 2005. Monophyly and major clades in Meryta (Araliaceae). Syst. Bot. 30: 657-670.
50. Wiens, J.J. 2001. Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: Problems and solutions. Syst. Biol. 50: 689-699.