Overall versus individual changes for otoacoustic emissions and audiometry in a noise-exposed cohort

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 362-372

  Helleman, Hiske W ^a   Dreschler, Wouter A ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Audiogram; Hearing conservation; Monitoring; Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL); Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs); Significant emission shift; Significant threshold shift

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE INJURY; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; STANDARD;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859756848     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.653447     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Altman D.G. 1995. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 230-231.
2. Attias J., Furst M., Furman V., Reshef I., Horowitz G. et al. 1995. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss, Ear Hear, 16, 612-618. (Pubitemid 26001544)
3. Attias J. & Bresloff I. 1996. Noise induced temporary otoacoustic emission shifts. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol, 7, 221-233. (Pubitemid 26328492)
4. Attias J., Horovitz G., El-Hatib N. & Nageris, B. 2001. Detection and clinical diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions. Noise Health, 3, 19-31.
5. Balatsouras D.G. 2004. The evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Med Sci Monit, 10, CR218-CR222. (Pubitemid 38787632)
6. Beattie R.C. & Bleech J. 2000. Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise fl oor and DPOAE. Br J Audiol, 34, 305-309.
7. Beattie R.C., Kenworthy O.T. & Luna C.A. 2003. Immediate and short-term reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol, 42, 348-354. (Pubitemid 37345312)
8. Bhagat S.P. & Davis A.M. 2008. Modifi cation of otoacoustic emissions following ear-level exposure to MP3 player music. Int J Audiol, 47, 12, 751-760.
9. Davies L. & Gather U. 1993. The identifi cation of multiple outliers. J Am Stat Ass, 88, 782-792.
10. Desai A., Reed D., Cheyne A., Richards S. & Prasher D. 1999. Absence of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with normal audiometric thresholds implies exposure to noise. Noise Health, 1, 58-65.
11. Duvdevany A. & Furst M. 2007. The effect of longitudinal noise exposure on behavioral audiograms and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol, 46, 119-127. (Pubitemid 46439733)
12. Eckelbooth. http://www.eckeleurope.com/audiometric-booth.htm date last viewed 12/23/2010.
13. Franklin D.J., McCoy M.J., Martin G.K. & Lonsbury-Martin B.L. 1992. Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, Ear Hear, 13, 417-429. (Pubitemid 23019460)
14. Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Jonhson T.A., Dierking D.M. & Garner C.A. 2007. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in relation to hearing loss. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.), Otoacoustic Emissions, Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme, pp. 211-212.
15. Hamdan A.L., Abouchacra K.S., Zeki Al Hazzouri A.G. & Zaytoun G. 2008. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds. Ear Hear, 29, 360-377. (Pubitemid 351652233)
16. Helleman H.W., Jansen E.J. & Dreschler W.A. 2010. Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: General applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds. Int J Audiol, 49, 410-419.
17. Huang Z.W., Luo Y., Wu Z., Tao Z., Jones R. et al. 2005. Paradoxical enhancement of active cochlear mechanics in long-term administration of salicylate. J Neurophysiol, 93, 2053-2061. (Pubitemid 40404405)
18. International Organization for Standardization, 1989. ISO8253-1:1989. Acoustics: Audiometric test methods, Part 1: Basic pure-tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry, Geneva: ISO.
19. Job A., Raynal M., Kossowski M., Studler M., Ghernaouti C. et al. 2009. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: A three-year follow-up study. Hear Res, 251, 10-16.
20. Kakigi A., Hirakawa H., Harel N., Mount R.J. & Harrison R.V. 1998. Basal cochlear lesions result in increased amplitude of otoacoustic emissions, Audiol Neurootol, 3, 361-372. (Pubitemid 28438438)
21. Keppler H., Dhooge I., Maes L., D Haenens W., Bockstael A. et al. 2010. Transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions: A short-term test-retest reliability study. Int J Audiol, 49, 99-109.
22. Lapsley Miller J.A., Marshall L., & Heller L.M. 2004. A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program. Int J Audiol, 43, 307-322. (Pubitemid 38821608)
23. Lapsley Miller J.A., Marshall L. Heller L.M. & Hughes L.M. 2006. Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 280-296. (Pubitemid 44014167)
24. Lapsley Miller J.A. & Marshall L. 2007. Otoacoustic emissions as a preclini-cal measure of NIHL and susceptibility to NIHL. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.), Otoacoustic Emissions, Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme, pp. 321-341.
25. Lasky R.E., Snodgrass E. & Hecox K. 1994. Distortion-product otoacous-tic emission input/output functions as a function of frequency in human adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 183-194.
26. LePage E.L. & Murray N.M. 1998. Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: A study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Med J Aust, 169, 588-592. (Pubitemid 29002491)
27. Marshall L., Lapsley Miller J.A., Heller L.M., Wolgemuth K.S., Hughes L.M. et al. 2009. Detecting incipient inner-ear damage from impulse noise with otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 995-1013.
28. Mei L., Huang Z.W. & Tao Z.Z. 2009. Paradoxical long-term enhancement of distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude after repeated exposure to moderate level, wide band noise in awake guinea pigs. J Laryngol Otol, 123, 1090-1096.
29. Ng I.H.Y. & McPherson B. 2005. Test-retest reliability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the 1-7 kHz range. Audiol Med, 3, 108-115.
30. Reuter K., Ordoñez R.P., De Toro M.A.A. & Hammershøi D. 2007. Artifact rejection of distortion product otoacoustic emissions measured after sound exposure. In: A.Calvo-Manzano, A. Pérez-López, J. Salvador Santiago (eds.) Proc. of 19th International Congress on Acoustics-ICA07: Acoustics of the 21st Century. Spanish Acoustical Society, 2007.
31. Roede J., Harris F. P. Probst R. & Xu L. 1993. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology, 32, 273-281. (Pubitemid 23256044)
32. Seixas N.S., Goldman B., Sheppard L., Neitzel R., Norton S. et al. 2005. Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices. Occup Environ Med, 62, 309-317. (Pubitemid 40592490)
33. Shupak A., Tal D., Sharoni Z., Oren M., Ravid A. et al. 2007. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss. Otol Neurotol, 28, 745-752. (Pubitemid 47329885)
34. Sisto R., Chelotti S., Moriconi L., Pellegrini S., Citroni A. et al. 2007. Otoa-coustic emission sensitivity to low levels of noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 387-401. (Pubitemid 47365949)
35. Sockalingam R., Lee Choi J., Choi D. & Kei J. 2007. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in children with normal hearing: A preliminary study. Int J Audiol, 46, 351-354. (Pubitemid 47227196)
36. Stuart A., Passmore A.L., Culbertson D.S. & Jones S.M. 2009. Test-retest reliability of low-level evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 671-681.
37. Wagner W., Heppelmann G., Vonthein R. & Zenner H.P. 2008. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 29, 378-391. (Pubitemid 351652234)
38. Weir J.P. 2005. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coeffi cient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res, 19, 231-240. (Pubitemid 40417282)