Modification of otoacoustic emissions following ear-level exposure to MP3 player music

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 47, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 751-760

  Bhagat, Shaum P ^a   Davis, Anne M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Music induced hearing loss; Otoacoustic emissions; Sound pressure levels; Temporary threshold shift

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY CANAL; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; EXPOSURE VARIABLE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MICROPHONE; MUSIC; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; MALE; MP3-PLAYER; MUSIC; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 57649126104     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020802310879     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Attias, J. & Bresloff, I. 1996. Noise induced temporary otoacoustic emission shifts. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol, 7, 221-233.
2. Axelsson, A. & Lindgren, F. 1978. Temporary threshold shift after exposure to pop music. Scand Audiol, 7, 127-135.
3. Bilger, R.C., Matthies, M.L., Hammel, D.R. & Demorest, M.E. 1990. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res, 33, 418-432.
4. Brownell, W.E. 1990. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 11, 82-92.
5. Cacace, A.T., McClelland, W.A., Weiner, J. & McFarland, D.J. 1996. Individual differences and the reliability of 2F1-F2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: Effects of time-of-day, stimulus variables, and gender. J Speech Hear Res, 39, 1138-1148.
6. Chen, G.D. & Zhao, H.B. 2007. Effects of intense noise exposure on the outer hair cell plasma membrane fluidity. Hear Res, 226, 14-21.
7. Clark, J.A. & Pickles, J.O. 1996. The effects of moderate and low levels of acoustic overstimulation on stereocilia and their tip links in the guinea pig. Hear Res, 99, 119-128.
8. Cody, A.R. & Russell, I.J. 1985. Outer hair cells in the mammalian cochlea and noise-induced hearing loss. Nature, 315, 662-665.
9. Davis, B., Qiu, W. & Hamernik, R.P. 2005. Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in noise-exposed chinchillas. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 69-78.
10. Davis, B., Qiu, W. & Hamernik, R.P. 2004. The use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the estimation of hearing and sensory cell loss in noise-damaged cochleas. Hear Res, 187, 12-24.
11. Dhar, S., Talmadge, C.L., Long, G.R. & Tubis, A., 2002. Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 2882-2897.
12. Emmerich, E., Richter, F., Hagner, H., Giessler, F., Gehrlein, S. et al. 2002. Effects of discotheque music on audiometric results and central acoustic evoked neuromagnetic responses. Int Tinnitus J, 8, 13-19.
13. Engdahl, B. & Kemp, D. 1996. The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 1573-1587.
14. Furst, M., Reshef, I. & Attias, J. 1992. Manifestations of intense noise stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission and threshold microstructure: experiment and model. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 1003-1014.
15. Gaskill, S.A. & Brown, A.M. 1990. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 821-839.
16. Hamernik, R.P., Ahroon, W.A. & Lei, S.F. 1996. The cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the normal and noise-damaged chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 1003-1012.
17. Hellström, P.A., Axelsson, A. & Costa, O. 1998. Temporary threshold shift induced by music. Scand Audiol Suppl, 48, 87-94.
18. Hodgetts, W.E., Rieger, J.M. & Szarko R.A. 2007. The effects of listening environment and earphone style on preferred listening levels of normal hearing adults using an MP3 player. Ear Hear, 28, 290-297.
19. Hooks-Horton, S., Geer, S. & Stuart, A. 2001. Effects of exercise and noise on auditory thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 52-58.
20. Hu, B.H. 2007. Delayed mitochondrial dysfunction in apoptotic hair cells in chinchilla cochleae following exposure to impulse noise. Apoptosis, 12, 1025-1036.
21. Keogh, T., Kei, J., Driscoll, C. & Smyth, V. 2001. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren: Effects of ear asymmetry, handedness, and gender. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 506-513.
22. Kim, J.S., Nam, E.C. & Park, S.I. 2005. Electrocochleography is more sensitive than distortion-product otoacoustic emission test for detecting noise-induced temporary threshold shift. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 133, 619-624.
23. Konrad-Martin, D. & Keefe, D. 2003. Time-frequency analyses of transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: Testing cochlear model predictions. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 2021-2043.
24. Kramer, S., Dreisbach, L., Lockwood, J., Baldwin, K., Kopke, R. et al. 2006. Efficacy of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in protecting ears exposed to loud music. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 265-278.
25. Krishnamurti, S. & Grandjean, P.W. 2003. Effects of simultaneous exercise and loud music on hearing acuity and auditory function. J Strength Cond Res, 17, 307-313.
26. Kuroda, T., Fukuda, S., Chida, E., Kashiwamura, M., Matsumura, M. et al. 2001. Effects of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission. Auris Nasus Larynx, 28, supp 1, S33-S38.
27. Linss, V., Emmerich, E., Richter, F. & Linss, W. 2005. Is there a close relationship between changes in amplitudes of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell damage after exposure to realistic industrial noise in guinea pigs? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 262, 488-495.
28. Lonsbury-Martin, B. & Martin, G.K. 2001. Otoacoustic emissions. In: A.F. Jahn & J. Santos-Sacchi (eds.) Physiology of the Ear. San Diego: Singular, pp. 443-480.
29. Martin, G.K., Probst, R. & Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. 1990. Otoacoustic emissions in human ears: Normative findings. Ear Hear, 11, 106-120.
30. McFadden, D. & Mishra, R. 1993. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res, 71, 208-213.
31. McFadden, D. & Pasanen, E.G. 1999. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in heterosexuals, homosexuals, and bisexuals. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 2403-2413.
32. Morata, T.C. 2007. Young people: Their noise and music exposures and the risk of hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 46, 111-112.
33. Nordmann, A.S., Bohne, B.A. & Harding, G.W. 2000. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res, 139, 13-30.
34. Norton, S.J., Mott, J.B. & Champlin, C.A. 1989. Behavior of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation. Hear Res, 38, 243-258.
35. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 1981. Occupational noise exposure: Hearing conservation amendment. Federal Register, 46, 4078-4179.
36. Peitz, M. & Waelbroeck, P. 2005. An economist's guide to digital music. CESifo Economic Studies, 51, 359-428.
37. Penner, M.J., Glotzbach, L. & Huang, T. 1993. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: Measurement and data. Hear Res, 68, 229-237.
38. Plinkert, P.K., Hemmert, W., Wagner, W., Just, K. & Zenner, H.P. 1999. Monitoring noise susceptibility: Sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Audiol, 33, 367-382.
39. Reuter, K. & Hammershøi, D. 2007. Distortion product otoacoustic emission of symphony musicians before and after rehearsal. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 327-336.
40. Reuter, K., Ordoñez, R. & Hammershøi, D. 2007. Overexposure effects of a 1-kHz tone on the distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 378-386.
41. Santos, L., Morata, T.C., Jacob, L.C., Albizu, E., Marques, J.M. et al. 2007. Music exposure and audiological findings in Brazilian disc jockeys (DJs). Int J Audiol, 46, 223-231
42. Schmuziger, N., Patscheke, J. & Probst, R. 2007. An assessment of threshold shifts in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry. Ear Hear 28, 643-648.
43. Shera, C. 2004. Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 25, 86-97.
44. Shera, C.A. & Guinan, J.J., Jr. 1999. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 782-798.
45. Sisto, R., Chelotti, S., Moriconi, L., Pellegrini, S., Citroni, A. et al. 2007. Otoacoustic emission sensitivity to low levels of noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 387-401.
46. Sisto, R., Moleti, A. & Lucertini, M. 2001. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and relaxation dynamics of long decay time OAEs in audiometrically normal and impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 638-647.
47. Sisto, R. & Moleti, A. 1999. Modeling otoacoustic emissions by active nonlinear oscillators. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 1893-1906.
48. Sutton, L.A., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Martin, G.K. & Whitehead, M.L. 1994. Sensitivity of distortion- product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: Time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res, 75, 161-174.
49. Talmadge, C.L., Long, G.R., Tubis, A. & Dhar, S. 1999. Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 275-292.
50. Talmadge, C.L., Tubis, A., Long, G.R. & Piskorski, P. 1998. Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 1517-1543.
51. Tsuprun, V., Schachern, P.A., Cureoglu, S. & Paperella, M. 2003. Structure of the stereocilia side links and morphology of auditory hair bundle in relation to noise exposure in the chinchilla. J Neurocytol, 32, 1117-1128.
52. Veuillet, E., Martin, V., Suc, B., Vesson, J.F., Morgon, A. et al. 2001. Otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear suppression during auditory recovery from acoustic trauma in humans. Acta Otolaryngol, 121, 278-283.
53. Vinck, B.M., Van Cauwenberge, P.B., Leroy, L. & Corthals, P. 1999. Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea. Audiology, 38, 44-52.
54. Zogby International. 2006. Survey of Teens and Adults about the Use of Personal Electronic and Head Phones. Available at: http://www.asha.org/NR/ rdonlyres/10B67FA1-002C-4C7B-BA0B-1C0A3AF98A63/0/zogby_survey2006.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2007.