The effect of longitudinal noise exposure on behavioral audiograms and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 119-127

  Duvdevany, Amnon ^a   Furst, Miriam ^b  

^a MEDICAL CORPS   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Audiometric threshold shift; Blast noise; Rifle noise; Sensitivity to noise exposure; Slight hearing loss (SHL); Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EXPOSURE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NOISE; NOISE INJURY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLDIER; TRAINING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MILITARY PERSONNEL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 33947326432     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020600937402     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ACGIH 2002. Threshold Limit Values for chemical substances and physical agents (2002-2003). American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Ohio.
2. ANSI 1999. ANSI S3.1-1999. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. American National Standards Institute, New York.
3. Attias, J. & Bresloff, I. 1996. Noise induced temporary otoacoustic emission shifts. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, 7, 221-234.
4. Attias, J., Furst, M., Furman, V., Haran, I. R., Horowitz, G., et al. 1995. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 16, 612-618.
5. Berlin, C.I., Hood, L.J., Wen, H., Szabo, P., Cecola, R.P., et al. 1993. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research, 71, 1-11.
6. Cohen, A. & Furst, M. 2004. Integration of outer hair cell activity in one-dimensional cochlear model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 2185-2192.
7. Collet, L., Kemp, D.T., Veuillet, E., Duclaux, R., Moulin, A., et al. 1990. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hearing Research, 43, 251-262.
8. Dancer, A.L., Buck, K., Parmentier, G. & Hamery, P. 1998. The specific problem of noise in the military life. Scand Audiol, 27, 123-130.
9. Duvdevany A. 2004. The effect of repetitive noise exposure on human ear. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
10. Furst, M. & Lapid, M. 1988. A cochlear model for acoustic emissions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 222-229.
11. th cochlear mechanics workshop proceeding.
12. Henderson, D., Campo, P., Subramaniam, M. & Fiorino, F. 1992. Development of resistance to noise. In Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Mosby year book press, pp. 476-488.
13. Hotz, M.A., Probst, R., Harris, F.P. & Hauser, R. 1993. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Oto-Laryngology, 113, 472-482.
14. Maison, S.F. & Liberman, M.C. 2000. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a non-invasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. Journal of Neoroscience, 20, 4701-4707.
15. Marshall, L. & Heller, L.M. 1998. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as a measure of noise-induced threshold shift. Journal of Speech, Language. and Hearing Research, 41, 1319-1334.
16. Marshall, L., Lapsley Miller, J.A., Hughes L.M., Heller L. & Westhusin L.J. 2002. Changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and hearing thresholds after a six-month deployment on an aircraft carrier. Association for Research in Otolaryngology, annual midwinter research meeting, St. Petersburg, Florida, #772, p. 97.
17. MIL-STD 1998. MIL-STD-1474-D. Military standard noise limits for army materials. Department of Defence, USA.
18. Oeken, J. & Menz, D. 1996. Changes in DP-amplitude after acute noise impact. Laryngo-Rhino-Otology, 75, 265-269.
19. Prasher, D. 1998. New strategies for prevention and treatment of NIHL. The Lancet, 352, 1240-1242.
20. Puria, S., Guinan, J.J. & Liberman, M.C. 1996. Olivocochlear reflex assays: Effects of contralateral sound on compound action potential versus ear-canal distortion products. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 500-507.
21. Shera, C.A. 2003. Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 244-262.
22. Suckfull, M., Schneeweiss, S., Dreher, A. & Schorn, K. 1996. Evaluation of TEOAE and DPOAE measurements for the assessment of auditory thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Oto-Laryngology, 116, 528-533.
23. Sutton, L.A., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Martin, G.K. & Whitehead, M.L. 1994. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: Time-course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hearing Research, 75, 161-174.
24. Talmadge, C.L., Tubis, A., Long, G.L. & Piskorski, P. 1998. Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 1517-1543.
25. Veuillet, E., Duverdy-Bertholon, F. & Collet, L. 1996. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the growth of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hearing Research, 93, 128-135.
26. Veuillet, E., Martin, V., Suc, B., Vesson, J.F., Morgon, A., et al. 2001. Otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear suppression during auditory recovery from acoustic trauma in humans. Acta Oto-Laryngology, 121, 278-283.