Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 745-752

  Shupak, Avi ^a,b,d   Tal, Dror ^b   Sharoni, Zohara ^b   Oren, May ^b   Ravid, Avi ^c   Pratt, Hillel ^c  

^a Unit of Otoneurology   (Israel)

^b ISRAEL NAVAL MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (Israel)

^c TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^d CARMEL MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Noise; Noise induced hearing loss; Occupational; Otoacoustic emissions; Sensorineural hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FOLLOW UP; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOISE POLLUTION; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COHORT STUDIES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; ISRAEL; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MILITARY PERSONNEL; NOISE, OCCUPATIONAL; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFLEX;

EID: 34548263304     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3180a726c9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emission in perspective. In: Robinette MS, Glattke TJ, eds. Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Application. New York, NY: Thieme, 1997:1-22.
2. Hammernik RP, Qiu W. Correlations among evoked potential thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell loss following various noise exposures in the chinchilla. Hear Res 2000;150:245-57.
3. Desai A, Reed D, Cheyne A, Richards S, Prasher D. Absence of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with normal audiometric thresholds implies exposure to noise. Noise Health 1999;1:58-65.
4. Attias J, Furst M, Furman V, Reshef I, Horowitz G, Bresloff I. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995;16:612-8.
5. Seixas NS, Goldman B, Sheppard L, Neitzel R, Norton S, Kujawa SG. Prospective noise induced changes among construction industry apprentices. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:309-17.
6. LePage EL, Murray NM. Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: a study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Med J Aust 1998;169:588-92.
7. Plinkert PK, Hemmert W, Wagner W, Just K, Zenner HP. Monitoring noise susceptibility: sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Audiol 1999;33:367-82.
8. Bohne BA, Clark WWW. Growth of hearing loss and cochlear lesion with increasing duration of noise exposure. In: Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, eds. New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1982:283-300.
9. Maison SF, Liberman MC. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J Neurosci 2000;20:4701-7.
10. Hood LJ, Berlin CI, Hurley A, Cecola RP, Bell B. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects. Hear Res 1996;101:113-8.
11. Prieve BA, Gorga MP, Schmidt A, et al. Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;93:3308-19.
12. Vinck B, De-Vel E, Xu ZM, Van-Cauwenberge P. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: a normative study. Audiology 1996;35:231-45.
13. Lapsley Miller JA, Marshall L, Heller LM, Hughes LM. Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;120:280-96.
14. Smurzynski J, Leonhard G, Kim DO, Lafreniere DC, Jung MD. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1309-16.
15. Gorga MP, Neely ST, Ohlrich B, Hoover B, Redner J, Peters J. From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss. Ear Hear 1997;18:440-55.
16. Konopka W, Pawlacyzyk-Luszczynska M, Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Grzanka A, Zalewski P. Effects of impulse noise on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in soldiers. Int J Audiol 2005;44:3-7.
17. Lapsley Miller JA, Marshall L, Heller LM. A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program. Int J Audiol 2004;43:307-22.
18. Fraenkel R, Freeman S, Sohmer H. Use of ABR threshold and OAEs in detection of noise induced hearing loss. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2003;14:95-118.
19. Wagner W, Staud I, Frank G, Dammann F, Plontke S, Plinkert PK. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1216-23.
20. Veuillet E, Martin V, Suc B, Vesson JF, Morgon A, Collet L. Otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear suppression during auditory recovery from acoustic trauma in humans. Acta Otolaryngol 2001;121:278-83.
21. Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Kuehn M, Tisch M, Vonthein R, Zenner HP. Olivocochlear activity and temporary threshold shift-susceptibility in humans. Laryngoscope 2005;115:2021-8.
22. Avan P, Bonfis P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission spectra and high-resolution audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 2005;209:68-75.
23. Withnell RH, Yates GK, Kirk DL. Changes to low-frequency components of the TEOAE following acoustic trauma to the base of the cochlea. Hear Res 2000;139:1-12.
24. Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Scheinin SA, Coats AC. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal: II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 1987;28:191-208.