Transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions: A short-term test-retest reliability study

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 99-109

  Keppler, Hannah ^a   Dhooge, Ingeborg ^a   Maes, Leen ^a   D'Haenens, Wendy ^a   Bockstael, Annelies ^a   Philips, Birgit ^a   Swinnen, Freya ^a   Vinck, Bart ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; Normal hearing subjects; Test retest reliability; Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTRONICS; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE EAR; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; EAR, MIDDLE; ELECTRONICS; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PRESSURE; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77149162718     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992020903300431     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beattie R.C. & Bleech J. 2000. Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE. Br J Audiol, 34, 305-9.
2. Beattie R.C. & Ireland A. 2000. Effects of sample size on the noise floor and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol, 29, 93-102.
3. Beattie R.C., Kenworthy O.T. & Luna C.A. 2003. Immediate and short-term reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol, 42, 348-54.
4. Bonfils P. et al. 1990. Clinical significance of otoacoustic emissions: a perspective. Ear Hear, 11, 155-8.
5. Brass D. & Kemp D.T. 1994. Quantitative assessment of methods for the detection of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 15, 378-89.
6. Brownell W.E. 1990. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 11, 82-92.
7. Dieler R., Shehata-Dieler W.E., Klagges T. & Moser L.M. 1999. Intra- and intersubject variability of acoustically evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Laryngorhinootologie, 78, 339-44.
8. Engdahl B., Arnesen A.R. & Mair I.W. 1994. Reproducibility and short-term variability of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol, 23, 99-104.
9. Franklin D.J., McCoy M.J., Martin G.K. & Lonsbury-Martin B.L. 1992. Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 13, 417-29.
10. Hallenbeck H. & Dancer J. 2003. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing sensitivity: test-retest variability. Percept Mot Skills, 97, 990-2.
11. Harris F.P., Probst R. & Wenger R. 1991. Repeatability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology, 30, 135-41.
12. Kemp D.T., Ryan S. & Bray P. 1990. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 11, 93-105.
13. Kimberley B.P., Brown D.K. & Allen J.B. 1997. Distortion product emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.) Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications (First Edition). New York: Thieme, pp. 181-204.
14. Lapsley Miller J.A. & Marshall L. 2001. Monitoring the effects of noise with otoacoustic emissions. Seminars in Hearing, 22, 393-403.
15. Lapsley Miller J.A., Marshall L. & Heller L.M. 2004. A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program. Int J Audiol, 43, 307-22.
16. Lapsley Miller J.A., Marshall L., Heller L.M. & Hughes L.M. 2006. Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 280-96.
17. Lonsbury-Martin B.L. & Martin G.K. 2001. Evoked otoacoustic emissions as objective screeners for ototoxicity. Seminars in Hearing, 22, 377-92.
18. Lonsbury-Martin B.L. & Martin G.K. 2003. Otoacoustic emissions. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 11, 361-6.
19. Lonsbury-Martin B.L. & Martin G.K. 1990. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 11, 144-54.
20. Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Whitehead M.L. & Martin G.K. 1991. Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 964-81.
21. Marshall L. & Heller L.M. 1996. Reliability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 17, 237-54.
22. Marshall L., Lapsley Miller J.A. & Heller L.M. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions as a screening tool for noise-induced hearing loss. Noise & Health, 3, 43-60.
23. Mills D.M. et al. 2007. Developing standards for distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 2203-14.
24. Ng I.H. & McPherson B. 2005. Test-retest reliability of DPOAEs in the 1 to 7 kHz range. Audiological Medicine, 3, 108-15.
25. Norton S.J. 1992. Cochlear function and otoacoustic emissions. Seminars in Hearing, 13, 1-14.
26. Popelka G.R., Karzon R.K. & Clary R.A. 1998. Identification of noise sources that influence distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements in human neonates. Ear Hear, 19, 319-28.
27. Prieve B.A. 2002. Otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.) Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications (Second Edition). New York: Thieme, pp. 348-374.
28. Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. & Martin G.K. 1991. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 2027-67.
29. Roede J., Harris F.P., Probst R. & Xu L. 1993. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology, 32, 273-81.
30. Shehata-Dieler W.E., Dieler R., Teichert K. & Moser L.M. 1999. Intra- and intersubject variability of acoustically evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Laryngorhinootologie, 78, 345-50.
31. Sockalingam R., Kei J. & Ho C.D. 2007. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in children with normal hearing: A preliminary study. Int J Audiol, 46, 351-4.
32. Trine M.B., Hirsch J.E. & Margolis R.H. 1993. The effect of middle ear pressure on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 14, 401-7.
33. Vedantam R. & Musiek F.E. 1991. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in adult subjects: Standard indices and test-retest reliability. Am J Otol, 12, 435-42.
34. Wagner W., Heppelmann G., Vonthein R. & Zenner H.P. 2008. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 29, 378-91.
35. Weir J.P. 2005. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res, 19, 231-40.
36. Whitehead M.L., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. & Martin G.K. 1993. The influence of noise on the measured amplitudes of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res, 36, 1097-102.
37. Zhao F. & Stephens D. 1999. Test-retest variability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in human ears with normal hearing. Scand Audiol, 28, 171-8.