A Comparison of Three Job Engagement Measures: Examining their Factorial and Criterion-Related Validity

Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 67-90

  Wefald, Andrew J ^a   Mills, Maura J ^b   Smith, Michael R ^c   Downey, Ronald G ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Britt; Engagement; Factor analysis; Measurement; Schaufeli; Shirom; Turnover intentions; Vigor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY; WORKLOAD; WORKPLACE;

ADULT; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONNEL TURNOVER; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WORKLOAD; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84859609469     PISSN: 17580846     EISSN: 17580854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01059.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abelson, R.P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129-133.
2. Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
3. Bakker, A.B., Albrecht, S.L., & Leiter, M.P. (2011a). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 4-28.
4. Bakker, A.B., Albrecht, S.L., & Leiter, M.P. (2011b). Work engagement: Further reflections on the state of play. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 74-88.
5. Blau, G., & Holliday, E.B. (2006). Testing the discriminant validity of a four-dimensional occupational commitment measure. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 691-704.
6. Brayfield, A.H., & Rothe, H.F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311.
7. Britt, T.W. (1999). Engaging the self in the field: Testing the Triangle Model of Responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 696-706.
8. Britt, T.W. (2003). Aspects of identity predict engagement in work under adverse conditions. Self and Identity, 2, 31-45.
9. Britt, T.W., Adler, A.B., & Bartone, P.T. (2001). Deriving benefits from stressful events: The role of engagement in meaningful work and hardiness. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 53-63.
10. Britt, T.W., & Bliese, P.B. (2003). Testing the stress-buffering effects of self engagement among soldiers on a military operation. Journal of Personality, 72, 245-265.
11. Britt, T.W., Castro, C.A., & Adler, A.B. (2005). Self-engagement, stressors, and health: A longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1475-1486.
12. Britt, T.W., Dickinson, J.M., Greene-Shortridge, T.M., & McKibben, E. (2007). Self engagement at work. In C.L. Cooper & D. Nelson (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior: Accentuating the positive at work (pp. 143-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13. Britt, T.W., Thomas, J.L., & Dawson, C.R. (2006). Self-engagement magnifies the relationship between qualitative overload and performance in a training setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2100-2114.
14. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural models (pp. 126-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Christian, M.S., & Slaughter, J.E. (2007, August). Work engagement: A meta-analytic review and directions for research in an emerging area. Paper presented at the sixty-seventh annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.
17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388.
18. Hallberg, U.E., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2006). "Same same" but different? Can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment? European Psychologist, 11, 119-127.
19. Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., & Hayes, T.L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.
20. Hobfoll, S.E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.
21. Hoyle, R.H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
23. Johnson, J.W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1-19.
24. Johnson, J.W., & LeBreton, J.M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 238-257.
25. Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
26. Keller, R.T. (1984). The role of performance and absenteeism in the prediction of turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 176-183.
27. LeBreton, J.M., Hargis, M.B., Griepentrog, B., Oswald, F.L., & Ployhart, R.E. (2007). A multidimensional approach for evaluating variables in organizational research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 60, 475-498.
28. Llorens, S., Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B., & Salanova, M. (2006). Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 378-391.
29. Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B., & Norman, S.M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541-572.
30. MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
31. Macey, W.H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30.
32. May, D.R. Gilson, R.L., & Harter, L.M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.
33. Mills, M.J., Culbertson, S.S., & Fullagar, C.J. (in press). Conceptualizing and measuring engagement: An analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Journal of Happiness Studies.
34. Rich, B.L., Lepine, J.A., & Crawford, E.R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617-635.
35. Schaufeli, W.B., & Bakker, A.B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
36. Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716.
37. Schaufeli, W.B., Martinez, I., Pinto, A.M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A.B. (2002a). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464-481.
38. Schaufeli, W.B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In S.W. Gilliland, D.D. Steiner, & D.P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (Volume 5): Managing social and ethical issues in organizations (pp. 135-177). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
39. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A.B. (2002b). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
40. Shirom, A. (2003). Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect in organizations. In D. Ganster & P.L. Perrewe (Eds.), Research in organizational stress and well-being (Vol. 3, pp. 135-165). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. Shirom, A. (2005). Shirom-Melamed Vigor Measure (English). Retrieved from:
42. Shirom, A. (2011). Vigor as a positive affect at work: Conceptualizing vigor, its relations with related constructs, and its antecedents and consequences. Review of General Psychology, 15, 50-64.
43. Shraga, O. (2007). Vigor at work: Its construct validity, and its relations with job satisfaction and job characteristics: Triangulating qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
44. Shraga, O., & Shirom, A. (2009). A qualitative investigation into the construct validity of vigor and its antecedents. Human Relations, 62, 271-279.
45. Solinger, O.N., van Olffen, W., & Roe, R.A. (2008). Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 70-83.
46. Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between non-work and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518-528.
47. Wefald, A.J., & Downey, R.G. (2009). The construct dimensionality of engagement and its relationship with satisfaction. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 143, 91-111.