Student data systems and their use for educational improvement

International Encyclopedia of Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 14-20

  Wayman, J C ^a   Cho, V ^a   Richards, M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Data systems; Data use; Data based decision making; Data driven decision making; Data informed decision making; Student data systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859588703     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01699-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Alavi M., Leidner D.E. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly 2001, 25(1):107-136.
2. Brunner C., Fasca C., Heinze J., et al. Linking data and learning: The Grow Network study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 2005, 10(3):241-267.
3. Chen E., Heritage M., Lee J. Identifying and monitoring students' learning needs with technology. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 2005, 10(3):309-332.
4. Chrispeels J.H., Brown J.H., Castillo S. School leadership teams: Factors that influence their development and effectiveness. Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy 2000, 4:39-73.
5. Copland M.A. Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2003, 25:375-395.
6. Datnow A., Park V., Wohlstetter P. Achieving with Data: How High-Performing School Systems Use Data to Improve Instruction for Elementary Students 2007, University of Southern California, Rossier School of Education, Center on Educational Governance, Los Angeles.
7. Forman C., Ghose A., Wiesenfeld B. Examining the relationship between review and sales: The role of reviewer identity discloser in electronic markets. Information Systems Research 2008, 19(3):291-313.
8. Gallagher L., Means B., Padilla C. Teachers' Use of Data Systems to Improve Instruction 2008, US Department of Education, Washington, DC.
9. Halverson R., Grigg G., Pritchett R., Thomas C. The New Instructional Leadership: Creating Data-Driven Instructional Systems in Schools 2005, (accessed October 2009). http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publicatoins/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_200 5_9.pdf.
10. Ingram D., Louis K.S., Schroeder R.G. Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record 2004, 106:1258-1287.
11. Lachat M.A., Smith S. Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 2005, 10(3):333-349.
12. Malone T.M., Yates J., Benjamin R.I. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies: Effects of information technologies on market structure and corporate strategies. Communications of the ACM 1987, 30(6):484-497.
13. Mandinach E.B., Honey M., Light D., Brunner C. A conceptual framework for data-driven decision making. Data-Driven School Improvement 2008, 13-31. Teachers College Press, New York. E.B. Mandinach, M. Honey (Eds.).
14. Massell D. The theory and practice of using data to build capacity: State and local strategies and their effects. From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States 2001, 148-169. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. S.H. Fuhrman (Ed.).
15. McLeod S. Technology tools for data-driven teachers 2005, (accessed October 2009). http://www.microsoft.com/education/ThoughtLeadersDDDM.mspx.
16. Midgley S. The case for open markets in education 2006, (accessed October 2009). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_7/midgley/index.html.
17. Mieles T., Foley E. Data Warehousing: Preliminary Findings from a Study of Implementing Districts 2005, Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Philadelphia, PA.
18. Murphy J. Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly 2002, 38(2):176-191.
19. Schuler C. Pockets of Potential: Using Mobile Technologies to Promote Children's Learning 2009, The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, New York.
20. Silva E. Measuring Skills for the 21sth Century. Education Sector Reports 2008, Education Sector, Washington, DC.
21. Stenmark D. Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge. Journal of Management Information Systems 2000/2001, 17(3):9-24.
22. Stringfield S., Reynolds D., Schaffer E. Fifth-year results from the High Reliability Schools project. Symposium Presented at the Meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement 2001, Toronto, Canada.
23. Supovitz J.A., Klein V. Mapping a Course for Improved Student Learning: How Innovative Schools Systematically Use Student Performance Data to Guide Improvement 2003, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Philadelphia, PA.
24. Thomas J.B., Sussman S.W., Henderson J.C. Understanding "strategic learning": Linking organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organization Science 2001, 12(3):331-345.
25. Tucker B. Beyond the Bubble: Technology and the Future of Student Assessment 2009, Education Sector, New York.
26. Valli L., Buese D. The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal 2007, 44(3):519-558.
27. Wayman J.C. Involving teachers in data-driven decision-making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 2005, 10(3):295-308.
28. Wayman J.C. Student data systems for school improvement: The state of the field. TCEA Educational Technology Research Symposium: Vol. 1 2007, 156-162. ProActive, Lancaster, PA.
29. Wayman J.C., Cho V. Preparing educators to effectively use student data systems. Handbook on Data-Based Decision-Making in Education 2008, 89-104. Routledge, New York. T.J. Kowalski, T.J. Lasley (Eds.).
30. Wayman J.C., Cho V., Johnston M.T. The Data-Informed District. A District-Wide Evaluation of Data Use in the Natrona County School District 2007, The University of Texas, Austin.
31. Wayman J.C., Cho V., Shaw S.M. First-Year Results from an Efficacy Study of the Acuity Data System 2009, The University of Texas, Austin.
32. Wayman J.C., Conoly K. Managing curriculum: Rapid implementation and sustainability of a districtwide data initiative. ERS Spectrum 2006, 24(2):4-8.
33. Wayman J.C., Stringfield S. Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education 2006, 112(4):549-571.
34. Wayman J.C., Midgley S., Stringfield S. Leadership for data-based decisionmaking: Collaborative data teams. New Models of Professional Development for Learner Centered Leadership 2006, 189-206. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. A. Danzig, K. Borman, B. Jones, B. Wright (Eds.).
35. Wayman J.C., Stringfield S., Yakimowski M. Software Enabling School Improvement Through Analysis of Student Data (CRESPAR Technical Report No. 67) 2004, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
36. Young V.M. Teachers' use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education 2006, 112(4):521-548.
37. - Data Quality Campaign. http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org.
38. - Jeffrey C. Wayman's data use website. http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/.
39. - SIF Association. http://www.sifinfo.org.