Evolution of sexual isolation in laboratory populations: Fitness differences between mating types and the associated hybrid incompatibilities

American Naturalist

Volumn 165, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 429-438

  Alipaz, Julie A ^a,c   Karr, Timothy L ^a,b,d   Wu, Chung I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drosophila melanogaster; Fitness; Nascent speciation; Sexual selection; Zimbabwe

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; FITNESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CROSS BREEDING; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; ZIMBABWE;

ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; ZIMBABWE;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 17044400202     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/428407     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alipaz, J. A., C.-I. Wu, and T. L. Karr. 2001. Sperm-egg incompatibility between races of Drosophila. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:789-795.
2. Alipaz, J. A., S. Fang, N. Osada, and C.-I. Wu. 2005. Evolution of sexual isolation during secondary contact: genotypic versus phenotypic changes in laboratory populations. American Naturalist 165:420-428.
3. Andersson, M. 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818-820.
4. _. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Andolfatto, P., and M. Krietman. 2000. Molecular variation at the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics 154:1681-1691.
6. Basolo, A. 1998. Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265:2223-2228.
7. Begun, D. J., and C. F. Aquadro. 1993. African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature 365:548-550
8. Blows, M. W. 2002. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1113-1118.
9. Boag, P. T., and P. R. Grant. 1981. Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin's finches (Geospizinae) in the Galapagos. Science 214:82-85.
10. Bush, G. L. 1969. Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 23:237-251.
11. Chandrashekaran, S. 1995. A female sterile embryonic lethal in the maternally haplo-insufficient 21 B8.C1-21 C8.D1 genomic region of Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 123:121-126.
12. Darwin, C. 1875. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London.
13. Davis, A. W., J. Roote, T. Morley, K. Sawamura, S. Herrmann, and M. Ashburner. 1996. Rescue of hybrid sterility in crosses between D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Nature 380:157-159.
14. Dobzhansky, T. 1941. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
15. Dodd, D. M. B. 1989. Reproductive isolation as a consequence of adaptive divergence in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 43:1308-1311.
16. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
17. Engen, S., and B. E. Saether. 1985. The evolutionary significance of sexual selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology 117:277-289.
18. Etges, W. J. 1992. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 46:1945-1950.
19. _. 2002. Divergence in mate choice systems: does evolution play by rules? Genetica 116:151-166.
20. Fisher, R. A. 1915. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review 7:184-192.
21. _. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
22. Haldane, J. B. S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. Journal of Genetics 12:101-109.
23. Harrison, R. G. 1993. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
24. Heisler, L. 1985. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on arbitrary male characters. Heredity 55:187-198.
25. Hollocher, H., and C.-I. Wu. 1996. The genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: X vs. autosomal effects and male vs. female effects. Genetics 143:1243-1255.
26. Hollocher, H., C.-T. Ting, F. Pollack, and C.-I. Wu. 1997. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: variation in mating preference and correlation between sexes. Evolution 51:1175-1181.
27. Inoue, Y. H., M. D. Avides, M. Shiraki, P. Deak, M. Yamaguchi, Y. Nishimoto, A. Matsukage, and D. M. Glover. 2000. Orbit, a novel microtubule-associated protein essential for mitosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Cell Biology 149:153-165.
28. Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski. 1995. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature 377:420-422.
29. Karr, T. L. 1991. Intracellular sperm/egg interactions in Drosophila: a three-dimensional structural analysis of a paternal product in the developing egg. Mechanisms of Development 34:101-111.
30. Karr, T. L., and S. Pitnick. 1996. The ins and outs of fertilization (letter). Nature 379:405-406.
31. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
32. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. R. Servedio. 1999. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics 151:865-884.
33. Kondrashov, A. S., and M. Shpak. 1998. On the origin of species by means of assortative mating. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265:2273-2278.
34. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 78:3721-3725.
35. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1985. Evolution of mating preferences and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 117:651-664.
36. Lee, C., V. Soares, C. Newberger, K. Manova, E. Lacy, and J. Hurwitz. 1998. RNA helicase A is essential for normal gastrulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95:13709-13713.
37. Markow, T. A. 1997. Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94:7756-7760.
38. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
39. Miyatake, T., and T. Shimizu. 1999. Genetic correlations between life history and behavioral traits can cause reproductive isolation. Evolution 53:201-208.
40. O'Donald, P. 1967. A general model of sexual and natural selection. Heredity 22:499-518.
41. _. 1980. Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Petrie, M. 1994. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371:598-599.
43. Price, T. 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353:251-260.
44. Seger, J. 1985. Unifying genetic models for the evolution of female choice. Evolution 39:1185-1193.
45. Takahashi, A., S.-C. Tsaur, J. A. Coyne, and C.-I. Wu. 2001. The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:3920-3925.
46. Ting, C.-T., A. Takahashi, and C.-I. Wu. 2001. Incipient speciation by sexual selection in Drosophila: concurrent evolution at multiple loci in both sexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:6709-6713.
47. True, J. R., B. S. Weir, and C. C. Laurie. 1996. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics 142:819-837.
48. Tsaur, S.-C., C.-T. Ting, and C.-I. Wu. 1998. Positive selection driving the evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa of Drosophila. II. Divergence vs. polymorphism. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15:1040-1046.
49. Weatherhead, P. J., and R. J. Robertson. 1979. Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: "the sexy son hypothesis." American Naturalist 113:201-208.
50. Wu, C.-I. 1985. A stochastic simulation study on speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 39:66-82.
51. Wu, C.-I., and A. W. Davis. 1993. Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation: the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. American Naturalist 142:187-212.
52. Wu, C.-I., and H. Hollocher. 1998. Subtle is nature: the genetics of species differentiation and speciation. Pages 339-351 in D. Howard and S. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
53. Wu, C.-I., H. Hollocher, D. J. Begun, C. F. Aquadro, Y. Xu, and M.-L. Wu. 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92:2519-2523.
54. Wu, C.-I., N. A. Johnson, and M. F. Palopoli. 1996. Haldane's rule and its legacy: why are there so many sterile males? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:281-284.
55. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53:205-214.