Plant communities in gradients

Plant Biosystems

Volumn 145, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 54-64

  Carni A ^a,b   Juvan, N ^a   Kosir P ^a,c   Marinsek A ^a   Pausic A ^a   Silc U ^a  

^a ANTON MELIK GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA   (Slovenia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PRIMORSKA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Classification; gradient; ordination; phytosociology; syntaxonomy; vegetation

Indexed keywords

FAGUS; PICEA; PINUS BRUTIA;

EID: 84859089772     PISSN: 11263504     EISSN: 17245575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2011.602730     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Anon. 2005. Sustman: Project - Introduction of broadleaf species for sustainable forest management, 5th Framework Programme Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources, Vienna: Department of Forest Ecology.
2. Barkman, J J. 1989. Fidelity and character-species, a critical evaluation. Vegetation, 85: 105-116.
3. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. "Pflanzensoziologie". In Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, Wien: Springer.
4. Bray, J P and Curtis, J T. 1957. An ordination of upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr, 27: 325-349.
5. Buhk, C., Gotzenberger, L, Wesche, K, Gomez, P S and Hensen, I. 2006. Post-fire regeneration in a Mediterranean pine forest with historically low fire frequency. Acta Oecol, 30: 288-298.
6. Burrascano, S, Rosati, L and Blasi, C. 2009. Plant species diversity in Mediterranean old-growth forests: A case study from central Italy. Plant Biosyst, 143: 190-200.
7. Čarni, A, Košir, P, Karadžić, B, Matevski, V, Redžić, S and Škvorc, Ž. 2009. Thermophilous deciduous forests in Southeastern Europe. Plant Biosyst, 143: 1-13.
8. Čarni, A, Košir, P, Marinšek, A, Šilc, U and Zelnik, I. 2007. Changes in structure, floristic composition and chemical soil properties in a succession of birch forests. Period Biol, 109: 13-20.
9. Čarni, A, Matevski, V and Šilc, U. 2010. Morphological, chorological and ecological plasticity of Cistus incanus in the southern Balkans. Plant Biosyst, 144: 602-617.
10. Casavecchia, S and Biondi, E. 2001. Phytosociological survey of Northern California dunes. Plant Biosyst, 135: 351-361.
11. Chiarucci, A. 2007. To sample or not to sample? That is the question... for the vegetation scientist. Folia Geobot, 42: 209-216.
12. Chytrý, M. 2009. Vegetace České republiky 2 Ruderal, weed, rock and scree vegetation, Praha: Academia.
13. Chytrý, M, Tichý, L, Holt, J and Botta-Dukát, Z. 2002. Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. J Veg Sci, 13: 79-90.
14. Clements, F E. 1916. Plant succession: An analysis of the development of vegetation. Publ Carnegie Inst, 242: 1-512.
15. Dengler, J. 2009. A flexible multi-scale approach for standardized recording plant species richness patterns. Ecol Indic, 9: 1169-1178.
16. Duarte, M C, Rego, F and Moreira, I. 2005. Distribution pattern of plant communities on Santiago Island, Cape Verde. J Veg Sci, 16: 283-292.
17. Eggler, F E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts. I: Initial floristic composition, a factor of old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio, 4: 412-417.
18. Ewald, J. 2003. A critique for phytosociology. J Veg Sci, 14: 291-296.
19. Flahault, C and Schröter, C. 1910. Rapport sur nomenclature phytogéographique. Actes III. Congr Int Bot Bruxelles, 1: 131-164.
20. Fried, G, Norton, R L and Reboud, X. 2008. Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agri Ecosys Envir, 128: 68-76.
21. Gleason, H A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club, 53: 7-26.
22. Gleason, H A. 1939. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Am Midl Nat, 21: 92-110.
23. Hallgren, E, Palmer, W M and Milberg, P. 1999. Data diving with cross-validation: An investigation of broad-scale gradients in Swedish weed communities. J Ecol, 87: 1037-1051.
24. Hemp, A. 2006. Continuum or zonation? Altitudinal gradients in the forest vegetation of Mt. Kilimanjaro. Plant Ecol, 184: 27-42.
25. Hill, M O. 1979. TWINSPAN, a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of individual attributes, Ithaca, NY: Ecology and Systematics, Cornel University.
26. Holzner, W. 1973. Ackerunkrautvegetation Niederoesterreichs. Mitt Bot Arb-gem Oberösterr, 5: 1-157.
27. Holzner, W. 1978. Weed species and weed communities. Vegetatio, 38: 13-20.
28. Juvan, N. 2008. Vegetation of silicate rocks with rock fissures [graduation thesis], 139 Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Biology.
29. Kavgaci, A, Başaran, S and Başaran, M A. 2010a. Cedar forest communities in Western Antalya (Taurus Mountains, Turkey). Plant Biosyst, 144: 271-287.
30. Kavgaci, A, Čarni, A, Başaran, S, Başaran, M A, Košir, P, Marinšek, A and Šilc, U. 2010b. Long-term post-fire succession of Pinus brutia forest in the east Mediterranean. Int J Wildland fire, 19: 599-605.
31. Kehl, H. 1995. "Vegetation dynamics of macchie and their derivates under the influence of small settlements near Antalya (SW-Turkey)". In Urban ecology as the basis of urban planning, Edited by: Sukopp, H, Numata, M and Huber, A. 85-150. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.
32. Ketenoglu, O, Tug, G N, Bingol, U, Geven, F, Kurt, L and Guney, K. 2010. Synopsis of syntaxonomy of Turkish forests. J Environ Biol, 31: 71-80.
33. Klimo, E, Hager, H and Kulhavy, J. 2000. Spruce monocultures in central Europe - Problems and prospect. Eur Forest Inst Proceed, 33: 1-208.
34. Knollová, I and Chytrý, M. 2004. Oak-hornbeam forests of the Czech Republic: Geographical and ecological approaches to vegetation classification. Preslia, 76: 291-311.
35. Košir, P, Čarni, A and Di Pietro, R. 2008. Classification and phytogeographical differentiation of broad-leaved ravine forests in southeastern Europe. J Veg Sci, 19: 331-342.
36. Kropáč, Z. 2006. Segetal vegetation in the Czech Republic: Synthesis and syntaxonomical revision. Preslia, 78: 123-209.
37. Kropáč, Z and Hadač Hejný, E S. 1971. Some remarks on the synecological and syntaxonomic problems of weed plant communities. Preslia, 43: 139-153.
38. Landi, M and Angiolini, C. 2010. Osmundo-Alnion woods in Tuscany (Italy): A phytogeographical analysis from a west European perspective. Plant Biosyst, 144: 93-110.
39. Lososová, Z, Chytrý, M, Cimalová, Š, Kropáč, Z, Otýpková, Z, Pyšek, P and Tichý, L. 2004. Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: Gradients of diversity and species composition. J Veg Sci, 15: 415-422.
40. McCune, B and Mefford, M J. 1999. "PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data". In Version 5.0, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA: MjM Software.
41. Moravec, J. 1989. Influences of the individualistic concept of vegetation on syntaxonomy. Vegetatio, 81: 29-39.
42. Mucina, L. 1993. "Asplenietea trichomanis". In Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs, Edited by: Grabherr, G and Mucina, L. 241-275. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Teil II. Natürliche waldfreie Vegetation
43. Mucina, L. 1997. Classification of vegetation: Past, present and future. J Veg Sci, 8: 751-760.
44. Oberdorfer, E. 1954. Über Unkrautgesellschaften der Balkanhalbinsel. Vegetatio, 4: 379-410.
45. Oberdorfer, E. 1993. Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften, Teil III: Wirtschaftswiesen und Unkrautgesellschaften., 3rd ed, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
46. Pausas, J C, Llovet, J, Rodrigo, A and Vallejo, R. 2008. Are wildfires a disaster in the Mediterranean basin? A review. Int J Wildland Fire, 17: 713-723.
47. Pignatti, S, Oberdorfer, E, Schaminée, J HJ and Westhoff, V. 1995. On the concept of vegetation class in phytosociology. J Veg Sci, 6: 143-152.
48. Pinke, G, Pal, R and Botta-Dukát, Z. 2009. Effects of environmental factors on weed species composition of cereal and stubble fields in western Hungary. Cent Eur J Biol, 5: 283-292.
49. Podani, J. 2001. "SYN-TAX 2000". In Computer programs for multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematics, Budapest: Scientia Publishing.
50. Rodwell, J S, Schaminée, J HJ, Mucina, L, Pignatti, S, Dring, J and Moss, D. 2002. "The diversity of European vegetation". In An overview of phytosociological alliances and their relation to EUNIS habitats, Wageningen, NL: ECLNV. Report EC-LNV nr 2002/054
51. Roleček, J, Chytrý, M, Hájek, M, Lvončík, S and Tichý, L. 2007. Sampling design in large-scale vegetation studies: Do not sacrifice ecological thinking to statistical purism!. Folia Geobot, 42: 199-208.
52. Schubert, R and Mahn, E-G. 1968. Übersicht über die Ackerunkrautgesellschaften Mitteldeutschlands. Fed Repert, 80: 133-304.
53. Šilc, U and Čarni, A. 2007. Formalized classification of weed vegetation of arable land in Slovenia. Preslia, 79: 283-302.
54. Šilc, U, Vrbničanin, S, Božić, D, Čarni, A and Dajić, Z. 2008. Phytosociological alliances in the vegetation of arable fields in the northwestern Balkan Peninsula. Phytocoenology, 38: 241-254.
55. Šilc, U, Vrbničanin, S, Božić, D, Čarni, A and Stevanović, Z D. 2009. Weed vegetation in the north-western Balkans: Diversity and species composition. Weed Research, 49: 602-612.
56. Slavnić. 1951. Pregled nitrofilne vegetacije Vojvodine. Nauč Zborn Matice Srpske, 1: 84-169.
57. StatSoft, Inc. 2007. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0 www.statsoft.com
58. Ter Braak, J FC and Šmilauer, P. 2002. "CANOCO reference manual and CANODRAW for Windows". In User's guide for CANOCO for Windows: Software for canonical community ordination (Version 4.5), Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power.
59. Tichý, L. 2002. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J Veg Sci, 13: 451-453.
60. Tsiripidis, I, Bergmeier, E and Dimopoulos, P. 2007. Geographical and ecological differentiation in Greek Fagus forest vegetation. J Veg Sci, 18: 743-750.
61. Tüxen, R. 1950. Grundriss einer Systematik der nitrophilen Unkrautgesellschaften in der Eurosibirischen Region Europas. Mitt Flor-soz Arb-gem, 2: 94-175.
62. Valachovič, M. 1995. "Asplenietea trichomanis Br.-Bl. 1934 in Meier et Br.-Bl. 1934". In Rastlinné spoločenstvá Slovenska, Edited by: Valachovič, M. 15-41. Bratislava: Veda vydavateľstvo Slovenskej Akadémie vied. 1. Pionierska vegetácia
63. van der, E. Maarel. 1975. The Braun-Blanquet approach in perspective. Vegetatio, 30: 213-219.
64. Whittaker, R. 1973. "Introduction". In Ordination and classification of Communities, Edited by: Whittaker, R. 617-726. The Hague: Junk. Handbook of vegetation science 5
65. Wildi, O and Orlóci, L. 2009. "Essay on the study of vegetation process". In A changing world, Edited by: Kienast, F, Wildi, O and Ghosh, S. 195-207. Dordrecht: Springer. Challenges for landscape research
66. Wilson, J B. 1991. Does vegetation science exist?. J Veg Sci, 2: 289-290.