Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 128, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 68-76

  Fried, Guillaume ^a,b   Norton, Lisa R ^c   Reboud, Xavier ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b LNPV   (France)

^c CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

'Biovigilance Flore'; Agricultural practices; Broad scale; Environmental gradient; Weed community; Weed survey

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SURVEY; WEED;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 46449107863     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersson T.N., and Milberg P. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Sci. 46 (1998) 30-38
2. Andreasen C., Streibig J.C., and Haas H. Soil properties affecting the distribution of 37 weed species in Danish fields. Weed Res. 31 (1991) 181-187
3. Bardat J., Bioret F., Botineau M., Boullet V., Delpech R., Gehu J.M., Haury J., Lacoste A., Rameau J.C., Royer J.M., Roux G., and Touffet J. Prodrome des Végétations de France (2004), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris
4. Barralis G. Méthode d'étude des groupements adventices des cultures annuelles. 5ème Colloque International sur l'Ecologie et la Biologie des Mauvaises herbes (1976), INRA, Dijon pp. 59-68
5. Bayer. In: Bayer A.G. (Ed). Important Crops of the World and Their Weeds. 2nd ed. (1992), Leverkusen
6. Benichou P., and Lebreton O. Prise en compte de la topographie pour la cartographie des champs pluviométriques statistiques. La Météorologie 7 (1987) 23-34
7. Braun-Blanquet J., Gajewski W., Wraber M., and Walas J. Prodrome des groupements végétaux. 3. Classe des Rudereto-Secalinetales (1936), Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Montpellier
8. Boutin C., Baril A., and Martin P.A. Plant diversity in crop fields and woody hedgerows of organic and conventional farms in contrasting landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 123 (2008) 185-193
9. Caussanel J.P. Nuisibilité et seuil de nuisibilité des mauvaises herbes dans une culture annuelle: situation de concurrence bispécifique. Agronomie 9 (1989) 219-240
10. Dale M.R.T., Thomas A.G., and John E.A. Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Can. J. Bot. 70 (1992) 1931-1939
11. De Snoo G.R. Unsprayed field margins: effects on environment, biodiversity and agricultural pratice. Landsc. Urban Plann. 46 (1999) 151-160
12. Fried G., and Reboud X. Évolution de la composition des communautés adventices des cultures de colza sous l'influence des systèmes de cultures. OCL 14 (2007) 1-9
13. ème Conférence du Columa. Journées Internationales sur la Lutte Contre les Mauvaises Herbes. Dijon (2007) 315-325
14. Fried, G., Chauvel, B., Reboud, X., in press. A functional analysis of large-scale temporal shifts in the sunflower weed assemblages in France between 1970 and 2000. J. Veg. Sci.
15. Gabriel D., Thies C., and Tscharntke T. Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 7 (2005) 85-93
16. Hallgren E., Palmer M.W., and Milberg P. Data diving with cross-validation: an investigation of broad-scale gradients in Swedish weed communities. J. Ecol. 87 (1999) 1037-1051
17. Hüppe J., and Hofmeister H. Syntaxonomische fassung und übersicht über die ackerunkrautgesellschaften der bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ber. Reinh.-Tüxen-Ges. 2 (1990) 61-81
18. Ihaca R., and Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5 (1996) 299-314
19. Koleff P., Gaston K.J., and Lennon J.J. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. J. Anim. Ecol. 72 (2003) 367-382
20. Legère A., Stevenson F.C., and Benoit D.L. Diversity and assembly of weed communities: contrasting responses across cropping systems. Weed Res. 45 (2005) 303-315
21. Le Maignan, I., 1981. Contributions à l'étude des groupements de mauvaises herbes des cultures françaises. Aspects synsystématiques et biologiques. Ph.D. Thesis. Université Paris-Sud, Orsay.
22. Lososova Z., Chytry M., Cimalova S., Kropac Z., Otypkova Z., Pysek P., and Tichy L. Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: gradients of diversity and species composition. J. Veg. Sci. 15 (2004) 415-422
23. Loudyi M.C., Godron M., and El Khyari D. Influence des variables écologiques sur la distribution des mauvaises herbes des cultures du Saïs (Maroc central). Weed Res. 35 (1995) 225-240
24. Marshall E.J.P., and Arnold G.M. Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK. Landsc. Urban Plann. 31 (1995) 205-216
25. Mas M.T., and Verdu A.M.C. Tillage system effects on weed communities in a 4-year crop rotation under mediterranean dryland conditions. Soil Till. Res. 74 (2003) 15-24
26. Mucina L. Stellarietea mediae. In: Mucina L., Grabherr G., and Ellmauer T. (Eds). Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Teil I. Anthropogene Vegetation (1993), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena 110-168
27. Pysek P., and Leps J. Response of a weed community to nitrogen fertilization: a multivariate analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 2 (1991) 237-244
28. Ries C. Überblick über die ackerunkrautvegetation österreichs und ihre entwicklung in neuerer. Zeit. Diss. Bot. 187 (1992) 1-188
29. Roschewitz I., Gabriel D., Tscharntke T., and Thies C. The effects of landscape complexity on arable weed species diversity in organic and conventional farming. J. Appl. Ecol. 42 (2005) 873-882
30. Salonen J. Weed infestation and factors affecting weed incidence in spring cereals in Finland-a multivariate approach. Agric. Food Sci. Finland 2 (1993) 525-536
31. Sosnoskie L.M., Herms N.P., and Cardina J. Weed seedbank community composition in a 35-yr-old tillage and rotation experiment. Weed Sci. 54 (2006) 263-273
32. Stevenson F.C., Légère A., Simard R.R., and Pageau D. Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Sci. 45 (1997) 798-806
33. ter Braak C.J.F. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 69 (1986) 69-77
34. Thioulouse J., Chessel D., Dolédec S., and Olivier J.M. ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat. Comput. 7 (1997) 75-83
35. Thomas A.G., and Dale M.R.T. Weed community structure in spring-seeded crops in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71 (1991) 1069-1080
36. Weibull A.C., Ostman O., and Granqvist A. Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodivers. Conserv. 12 (2003) 1335-1355