Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: Gradients of diversity and species composition

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 415-422

  Lososova Z ^a   Chytry M ^a   Cimalova S ^b   Kropac Z ^c   Otypkova Z ^a   Pysek P ^c   Tichy L ^a  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Alien species; Altitude; Canonical Correspondence Analysis; Cereal; Czech Republic; Plant community; Root crop; Seasonal dynamics; Slovakia; Temporal change; diversity

Indexed keywords

ARABLE LAND; BIODIVERSITY; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; VEGETATION STRUCTURE; WEED;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE; SLOVAKIA;

EID: 2442434237     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02279.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anon. 2001. STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Version 6. StatSoft, Inc., www.statsoft.com.
2. Andersson, T.N. & Milberg, P. 1998. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Sci. 46: 30-38.
3. Andreasen, C., Stryhn, H. & Streibig, J.C. 1996. Decline of the flora in Danish arable fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 619-626.
4. Begon, M., Harper, J.L. & Townsend, C.R. 1990. Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. 2nd ed. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
5. Borcard, D.P., Legendre, P. & Drapeau, P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
6. Braun-Blanquet, J., Gajewski, W., Wraber, M. & Walas, J. 1936. Prodrome des groupements végétaux. 3. Classe des Rudereto-Secalinetales. Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Montpellier, FR.
7. Chytrý, M. 2001. Phytosociological data give biased estimates of species richness. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 439-444.
8. Chytrý, M. & Rafajová, M. 2003. Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. Preslia 75: 1-15.
9. Dale, M.R.T, Thomas, A.G. & John, E.A. 1992. Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Can. J. Bot. 70: 1931-1939.
10. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, US.
11. Ellenberg, H. 1996. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. 5th ed. Ulmer, Stuttgart, DE.
12. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Düll, R., Wirth, W., Werner, W. & Paulißen, D. 1992. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. 2nd ed. Scripta Geobot. 18: 1-258.
13. Erviö, R., Hyvärinen, S., Erviö, L.-R. & Salonen, J. 1994. Soil properties affecting weed distribution in spring cereal and vegetable fields. Agric. Sci. Finl. 3: 497-504.
14. Glemnitz, M., Czimber, G., Radics, L. & Hoffmann, J. 2000. Weed flora composition along a north-south climate gradient in Europe. Acta Agron. Óváriensis 42: 155-169.
15. Hallgren, E., Palmer, M.W. & Milberg, P. 1999. Data diving with cross-validation: an investigation of broad-scale gradients in Swedish weed communities. J. Ecol. 87: 1037-1051.
16. Haveman, R., Schaminée, J.H.J. & Weeda, E.J. 1998. Stellarietea mediae. In: Schaminée, J.H.J., Weeda, E.J. & Westhoff, V. (eds.) De vegetatie van Nederland. Deel 4. Plantengemeenschappen van de kust en van binnenlandse pioniermilieus, pp. 199-246. Opulus Press, Uppsala, SE. (In Dutch.)
17. Hennekens, S.M. & Schaminée, J.H.J. 2001. TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 589-591.
18. Hilbig, W. 1987. Changes in segetal vegetation under conditions of industrialized agriculture. Arch. Nat. Conserv. Landsc. Res. 27: 229-249.
19. Hilbig, W. & Bachthaler, G. 1992. Wirtschaftsbedingte Veränderungen der Segetalvegetation in Deutschland im Zeitraum von 1950-1990. Angew. Bot. 66: 192-209.
20. Holzner, W. 1973. Die Ackerunkrautvegetation Niederösterreichs. Mitt. Bot. Arb.-Gem. Oberösterr. Landesmus. 5: 1-157.
21. Holzner, W. 1978. Weed species and weed communities. Vegetatio 38: 13-20.
22. Holzner, W. & Immonen, R. 1982. Europe: an overview. In: Holzner, W. & Numata, M. (eds.) Biology and ecology of weeds, pp. 203-226. W. Junk, The Hague, NL.
23. Hüppe, J. & Hofmeister, H. 1990. Syntaxonomische Fassung und Übersicht über die Ackerunkrautgesellschaften der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ber. Reinh.-Tüxen-Ges. 2: 61-81.
24. Jarolímek, I., Zaliberová, M., Mucina, L. & Mochnacký, S. 1997. Rastlinné spoločenstvá Slovenska. 2. Synantropná vegetácia (Plant communities of Slovakia 2. Synanthropic vegetation). Veda, Bratislava, SK. (in Slovak.)
25. Koleff, P., Gaston, K.J. & Lennon, J.J. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 367-382.
26. Kowarik, I., 1990. Some responses of flora and vegetation to urbanization in Central Europe. In: Sukopp, H., Hejný, S. & Kowarik, I. (eds.) Urban ecology, pp. 45-74. SPB, The Hague, NL.
27. Krippelová, T. & Mucina, L. 1988. Charakteristika vyšších syntaxónov triedy Stellarietea mediae na Slovensku (Characteristics of high-rank syntaxa of the class Stellarietea mediae in Slovakia). Preslia 60: 41-58. (In Czech.)
28. Kropáč, Z. 1988. Veränderungen der Unkrautgemeinschaften in der Tschechoslowakei und die Konsequenzen für die landwirtschaftliche Praxis. Wiss. Z. Univ. Halle 37: 100-126.
29. Kropáč, Z., Hadǎ, E. & Hejný, S. 1971. Some remarks on the synecological and syntaxonomic problems of weed plant communities. Preslia 43: 139-153.
30. Kubát, K., Hrouda, L., Chrtek, J. jun., Kaplan, Z., Kirschner, J. & Štěpánek, J. (eds.) 2002. Klíč ke kvěleně České republiky (Identification key to the flora of the Czech Republic). Academia, Praha, CZ. (In Czech.)
31. Lososová, Z. 2003. Estimating past distribution of vanishing weed vegetation in South Moravia. Preslia 75: 71-79.
32. Lososová, Z., Danihelka, J. & Chytrý, M. 2003. Seasonal dynamics and diversity of weed vegetation in tilled and mulched vineyards. Biologia 58: 49-57.
33. Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom-Helm, London, UK.
34. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A. 1989. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
35. Mihulka, S. 1998. The effect of altitude on the pattern of plant invasions: a field test. In: Starfinger, U., Edwards, K., Kowarik, I. & Williamson, M. (eds.) Plant invasions: Ecological mechanisms and human responses, pp. 313-320. Backhuys, Leiden, NL.
36. Mochnacký, S. 1987. Burinové spoločenstvá vagrocenózach Východoslovenskej nížiny (Weed communities in agrocoenoses of East Slovakian Lowland). Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, SK. (In Slovak.)
37. Moravec, J., Balátová-Tuláčková, E., Blažková, D., Hadač, E., Hejný, S., Husák, S., Jeník, J., Kolbek, J., Krahulec, F., Kropáč, Z., Neuhäusl, R., Rybníček, K., Řehořek, V. & Vicherek, J. 1995. Rostlinná společenstva České republiky a jejich ohrožení (Red list of plant communities of the Czech Republic and their endangerment). 2nd ed. Severočes. Přír., suppl. 1995: 1-206. (In Czech.)
38. Mucina, L. 1993. Stellarietea mediae. In: Mucina, L., Grabherr, G. & Ellmauer, T. (eds.) Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Teil I. Anthropogene Vegetation, pp. 110-168. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, DE.
39. Mucina, L. & Maglocký, S. (eds.) 1985. A list of vegetation units of Slovakia. Doc. Phytosociol. 9: 175-200.
40. Oberdorfer, E. (ed.) 1993. Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften. Teil III. Wirtschaftswiesen und Unkrautgesellschaften. 3rd ed. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, DE.
41. Økland, R.H. 1999. On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 131-136.
42. Otýpková, Z. 2001. Plevelová vegetace Bílých Karpat (Weed vegetation of the Bílé Karpaty Mts.). Masarykova univerzita, Brno, CZ. (In Czech.)
43. Passarge, H. & Jurko, A. 1975. Über Ackerunkrautgesellschaften im nordslowakischen Bergland. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 10: 225-264.
44. Pyšek, P. 1993. Factors affecting the diversity of flora and vegetation in central European settlements. Vegetatio 106: 89-100.
45. Pyšek, P. 1998a. Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. J. Biogeogr. 25: 155-163.
46. Pyšek, P. 1998b. Alien plants in Czech village flora: an analysis of species numbers. Feddes Repert. 109: 139-146.
47. Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J. & Mandák, B. 2002a. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74: 97-186.
48. Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V. & Kučera, T. 2002b. Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 104: 13-24.
49. Pyšek, P., Kučera, T. & Jarošík, V. 2002c. Plant species richness of nature reserves: the interplay of area, climate and habitat in a central European landscape. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 11: 279-289.
50. Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J., Mandák, B. & Jarošík, V. 2003. Czech alien flora and the historical pattern of its formation: what came first to Central Europe? Oecologia 135: 122-130.
51. Ries, C. 1992. Überblick über die Ackerunkrautvegetation Österreichs und ihre Entwicklung in neuerer Zeit. Diss. Bot. 187: 1-188.
52. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
53. Salonen, J. 1993. Weed infestation and factors affecting weed incidence in spring cereals in Finland - a multivariate approach. Agric. Sci. Finl. 2: 525-536.
54. Sukopp, H. 2002. On the early history of urban ecology in Europe. Preslia 74: 373-393.
55. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Šmilauer, P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination Version 4.5. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, US.
56. Thomas, A.G. & Dale, M.R.T. 1991. Weed community structure in spring-seeded crops in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71: 1069-1080.
57. Tichý, L. 2002. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 451-453.
58. Tüxen, R. 1950. Grundriß einer Systematik der nitrophilen Unkrautgesellschaften in der Eurosibirischen Region Europas. Mitt. Flor.-Soz. Arbeitsgem. N. F. 2: 94-175.