BLAST: A tool for error analysis of machine translation output

ACL HLT 2011 - 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of Student Session

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 56-61

  Stymne, Sara ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTEGRAL PART; LANGUAGE PAIRS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; OPEN SOURCE TOOLS; STANDARD EVALUATIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; INFORMATION THEORY;

ERROR ANALYSIS;

EID: 84859034515     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Lars Ahrenberg, Magnus Merkel, and Michael Petterstedt. 2003. Interactive word alignment for language engineering. In Proceedings of EACL, pages 49-52, Budapest, Hungary.
2. Colin Bannard and Chris Callison-Burch. 2005. Paraphrasing with bilingual parallel corpora. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 597-604, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
3. Chris Callison-Burch, Cameron Fordyce, Philipp Koehn, Christof Monz, and Josh Schroeder. 2007. (Meta-) evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of WMT, pages 136-158, Prague, Czech Republic, June.
4. Michael Denkowski and Alon Lavie. 2010. METEORNEXT and the METEOR paraphrase tables: Improved evaluation support for five target languages. In Proceedings of WMT and MetricsMATR, pages 339-342, Uppsala, Sweden.
5. Mireia Farrús, Marta R. Costa-jussà, José B. Mariño, and José A. R. Fonollosa. 2010. Linguistic-based evaluation criteria to identify statistical machine translation errors. In Proceedings of EAMT, pages 52-57, Saint Raphäel, France.
6. Mary Flanagan. 1994. Error classification for MT evaluation. In Proceedings of AMTA, pages 65-72, Columbia, Maryland, USA.
7. Ariadna Font Llitjós and Jaime Carbonell. 2004. The translation correction tool: English-Spanish user studies. In Proceedings of LREC, pages 347-350, Lisbon, Portugal.
8. Meghan Lammie Glenn, Stephanie Strassel, Lauren Friedman, and Haejoong Lee. 2008. Management of large annotation projects involving multiple human judges: a case study of GALE machine translation post-editing. In Proceedings of LREC, pages 2957-2960, Marrakech, Morocco.
9. Eduard Hovy, Margaret King, and Andrei Popescu-Belis. 2002. Principles of context-based machine translation evaluation. Machine Translation, 17(1):43-75.
10. Masaki Murata, Kiyotaka Uchimoto, Qing Ma, Toshiyuki Kanamaru, and Hitoshi Isahara. 2005. Analysis of machine translation systems' errors in tense, aspect, and modality. In Proceedings of PACLIC 19, pages 155-166, Taipei, Taiwan.
11. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 311-318, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
12. Maja Popović, Adrià de Gisper, Deepa Gupta, Patrik Lambert, Hermann Ney, José Mariño, and Rafael Banchs. 2006. Morpho-syntactic information for automatic error analysis of statistical machine translation output. In Proceedings of WMT, pages 1-6, New York City, New York, USA.
13. Matthew Snover, Bonnie Dorr, Richard Schwartz, Linnea Micciulla, and John Makhoul. 2006. A study of translation edit rate with targeted human notation. In Proceedings of AMTA, pages 223-231, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
14. Sara Stymne and Lars Ahrenberg. 2010. Using a grammar checker for evaluation and postprocessing of statistical achine translation. In Proceedings of LREC, pages 2175-2181, Valetta, Malta.
15. David Vilar, Jia Xu, Luis Fernando D'Haro, and Hermann Ney. 2006. Error analysis of machine translation output. In Proceedings of LREC, pages 697-702, Genoa, Italy.