Scaling up automatic cross-lingual semantic role annotation

ACL-HLT 2011 - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 299-304

  Van Der Plas, Lonneke ^a   Merlo, Paola ^a   Henderson, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROSS-LINGUAL; F-MEASURE; MANUAL ANNOTATION; SCALE-UP; SCALING-UP; SEMANTIC ANNOTATIONS; SEMANTIC ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC ROLES; SMALL SCALE; TARGET LANGUAGE; UPPER BOUND;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84859012911     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. A. Abeillé, L. Clément, and F. Toussenel. 2003. Building a treebank for French. In Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. P. Annesi and R. Basili. 2010. Cross-lingual alignment of FrameNet annotations through Hidden Markov Models. In Proceedings of CICLing.
3. R. Basili, D. De Cao, D. Croce, B. Coppola, and A. Moschitti, 2009. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, chapter Cross-Language Frame Semantics Transfer in Bilingual Corpora, pages 332-345. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
4. M.-H. Candito, B. Crabbé, P. Denis, and F. Guérin. 2009. Analyse syntaxique du français : des constituants aux dépendances. In Proceedings of la Conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles (TALN'09), Senlis, France.
5. B. Dorr. 1994. Machine translation divergences: A formal description and proposed solution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4):597-633.
6. C. J. Fillmore, R. Johnson, and M.R.L. Petruck. 2003. Background to FrameNet. International journal of lexicography, 16.3:235-250.
7. P. Fung, Z. Wu, Y. Yang, and D. Wu. 2007. Learning bilingual semantic frames: Shallow semantic parsing vs. semantic role projection. In 11th Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation (TMI 2007).
8. J. Henderson, P. Merlo, G. Musillo, and I. Titov. 2008. A latent variable model of synchronous parsing for syntactic and semantic dependencies. In Proceedings of CONLL 2008, pages 178-182.
9. R. Hwa, P. Resnik, A. Weinberg, and O. Kolak. 2002. Evaluating translational correspondence using annotation projection. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the ACL.
10. R. Hwa, P. Resnik, A.Weinberg, C. Cabezas, and O. Kolak. 2005. Bootstrapping parsers via syntactic projection accross parallel texts. Natural language engineering, 11:311-325. (Pubitemid 41398684)
11. R. Johansson and P. Nugues. 2006. A FrameNet-based semantic role labeler for Swedish. In Proceedings of the annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
12. P. Koehn. 2003. Europarl: A multilingual corpus for evaluation of machine translation.
13. J. Lang and M. Lapata. 2010. Unsupervised induction of semantic roles. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 939-947, Los Angeles, California, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M.A. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Comp. Ling., 19:313-330.
15. P. Merlo and L. van der Plas. 2009. Abstract:ion and generalisation in semantic role labels: PropBank, VerbNet or both? In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 288-296, Suntec, Singapore.
16. A. Meyers. 2007. Annotation guidelines for NomBank- noun argument structure for PropBank. Technical report, New York University.
17. P. Monachesi, G. Stevens, and J. Trapman. 2007. Adding semantic role annotation to a corpus of written Dutch. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW), pages 77-84, Prague, Czech republic.
18. F. J. Och and H. Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational Linguistics, 29:19-51. (Pubitemid 37049767)
19. Sebastian Padó and Mirella Lapata. 2009. Cross-lingual annotation projection of semantic roles. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 36:307-340.
20. S. Padó and G. Pitel. 2007. Annotation précise du français en sémantique de rôles par projection crosslinguistique. In Proceedings of TALN.
21. S. Padó. 2007. Cross-lingual Annotation Projection Models for Role-Semantic Information. Ph.D. thesis, Saarland University.
22. M. Palmer, D. Gildea, and P. Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31:71-105. (Pubitemid 43677420)
23. I. Titov and J. Henderson. 2007. A latent variable model for generative dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT-07), pages 144-155, Prague, Czech Republic.
24. I. Titov, J. Henderson, P. Merlo, and G. Musillo. 2009. Online graph planarisation for synchronous parsing of semantic and syntactic dependencies. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-09), Pasadena, California, July.
25. L. van der Plas, T. Samardžić, and P. Merlo. 2010. Crosslingual validity of PropBank in the manual annotation of French. In In Proceedings of the 4th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (The LAW IV), Uppsala, Sweden.
26. D. Wu and P. Fung. 2009a. Can semantic role labeling improve SMT? In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of European Association of Machine Translation.
27. D. Wu and P. Fung. 2009b. Semantic roles for SMT: A hybrid two-pass model. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the North American Chapter of ACL/Human Language Technology.
28. D. Yarowsky, G. Ngai, and R. Wicentowski. 2001. Inducing multilingual text analysis tools via robust projection across aligned corpora. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Language Technology (HLT).