Unsupervised induction of semantic roles

NAACL HLT 2010 - Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 939-947

  Lang, Joel ^a   Lapata, Mirella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; MANUAL ANNOTATION; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; SEMANTIC ROLES; TEXT GENRE; UNANNOTATED TEXTS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 80053264636     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Abend, O., R. Reichart, and A. Rappoport. 2009. Unsupervised Argument Identification for Semantic Role Labeling. In Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP. Singapore, pages 28-36.
2. Berger, A., S. Della Pietra, and V. Della Pietra. 1996. A Maximum Entropy Approach to Natural Language Processing. Computational Linguistics 22(1):39-71.
3. Bishop, C. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.
4. Bottou, L. 2004. Stochastic Learning. In Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning, Springer Verlag, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 146-168. (Pubitemid 39741631)
5. Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic Proto Roles and Argument Selection. Language 67(3):547-619.
6. Fillmore, C. J., C. R. Johnson, and M. R. L. Petruck. 2003. Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16:235-250.
7. Fürstenau, H. and M. Lapata. 2009. Graph Aligment for Semi-Supervised Semantic Role Labeling. In Proceedings of EMNLP. Singapore, pages 11-20.
8. Gildea, D. and D. Jurafsky. 2002. Automatic Labeling of Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics 28(3):245-288.
9. Grenager, T. and C. Manning. 2006. Unsupervised Discovery of a Statistical Verb Lexicon. In Proceedings of EMNLP. Sydney, Australia, pages 1-8.
10. Lapata, M. 1999. Acquiring Lexical Generalizations from Corpora: A Case Study for Diathesis Alternations. In Proceedings of the 37th ACL. pages 397-404.
11. Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. The University of Chicago Press.
12. Marcus, M., B. Santorini, and M. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 19(2):313-330.
13. Màrquez, L., X. Carreras, K. Litkowski, and S. Stevenson. 2008. Semantic Role Labeling: an Introduction to the Special Issue. Computational Linguistics 34(2):145-159.
14. McCarthy, D. 2002. Using Semantic Preferences to Identify Verbal Participation in Role Switching Alternations. In Proceedings of the 1st NAACL. Seattle, WA, pages 256-263.
15. McCarthy, D. and A. Korhonen. 1998. Detecting Verbal Participation in Diathesis Alternations. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL. Montréal, Canada, pages 1493-1495.
16. Melli, G., Y. Wang, Y. Liu, M. M. Kashani, Z. Shi, B. Gu, A. Sarkar, and F. Popowich. 2005. Description of SQUASH, the SFU Question Answering Summary Handler for the DUC-2005 Summarization Task. In Proceedings of the HLT/EMNLP Document Understanding Workshop. Vancouver, Canada.
17. Nivre, J., J. Hall, J. Nilsson, G. Eryigit A. Chanev, S. Kübler, S. Marinov, and E. Marsi. 2007. Malt-Parser: A Language-independent System for Datadriven Dependency Parsing. Natural Language Engineering 13(2):95-135. (Pubitemid 47090608)
18. Padó, S. and M. Lapata. 2009. Cross-lingual Annotation Projection of Semantic Roles. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 36:307-340.
19. Palmer, M., D. Gildea, and P. Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics 31(1):71-106.
20. Pradhan, S. S., W. Ward, and J. H. Martin. 2008. Towards Robust Semantic Role Labeling. Computational Linguistics 34(2):289-310.
21. Schulteim Walde, S. and C. Brew. 2002. Inducing German Semantic Verb Classes from Purely Syntactic Subcategorisation Information. In Proceedings of the 40th ACL. Philadelphia, PA, pages 223-230.
22. Shen, D. and M. Lapata. 2007. Using Semantic Roles to Improve Question Answering. In Proceedings of the EMNLP-CoNLL. Prague, Czech Republic, pages 12-21.
23. Surdeanu, M., S. Harabagiu, J. Williams, and P. Aarseth. 2003. Using Predicate-Argument Structures for Information Extraction. In Proceedings of the 41st ACL. Sapporo, Japan, pages 8-15.
24. Surdeanu, M., R. Johansson, A. Meyers, and L. Màrquez. 2008. The CoNLL-2008 Shared Task on Joint Parsing of Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies. In Proceedings of the 12th CoNLL. Manchester, England, pages 159-177.
25. Sutton, C. and A. McCallum. 2007. An Introduction to Conditional Random Fields for Relational Learning. In L. Getoor and B. Taskar, editors, Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning, MIT Press, pages 93-127.
26. Swier, R. and S. Stevenson. 2004. Unsupervised Semantic Role Labelling. In Proceedings of EMNLP. Barcelona, Spain, pages 95-102.
27. Wu, D. and P. Fung. 2009. Semantic Roles for SMT: A Hybrid Two-Pass Model. In Proceedings of NAACL HLT 2009: Short Papers. Boulder, Colorado, pages 13-16.
28. Yedidia, J., W. Freeman, and Y. Weiss. 2003. Understanding Belief Propagation and its Generalizations. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pages 239-269.