French clinical guidelines for prevention of perianaesthetic dental injuries: Long text;Bris dentaires périanesthésiques : Texte long

Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 213-223

  Nouette Gaulain, K ^a   Lenfant, F ^b   Jacquet Francillon, D ^c   Belbachir, A ^d   Bournigault Nuquet, A ^e   Choquet, O ^f   Claisse, A ^e   Dujarric, F ^e   Francon, D ^g   Gentili, M ^h   Majoufre Lefebvre, C ⁱ   Marciniack, B ^j   Pean D ^k   Yavordios, P G ^l   Leone, M ^m  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c Centre Hospitalier Beziers   (France)

^d Institut Cochin   (France)

^e Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montpellier ^*  (France)

^f LAPEYRONIE HOSPITAL   (France)

^g INSTITUT PAOLI CALMETTES   (France)

^h CHP de Saint Gregoire   (France)

ⁱ BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^j LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^k HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^l Clinique Convert   (France)

^m AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Adverse events in anaesthesia; Difficult intubation; Perianaesthetic dental injury; Poor dentition; Risk factor for dental injury

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; COST CONTROL; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIST; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; EXTUBATION; FRANCE; HUMAN; INCISOR; INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL STAFF; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT INFORMATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SURGEON; TOOTH INJURY;

ADULT; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIA, CONDUCTION; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CHILD; DENTITION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; JURISPRUDENCE; LARYNGEAL MASKS; LARYNGOSCOPY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TOOTH INJURIES;

EID: 84858990662     PISSN: 07507658     EISSN: 17696623     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Newland M.C., Ellis S.J., Peters K.R., Simonson J.A., Durham T.M., Ullrich F.A., et al. Dental injury associated with anesthesia: a report of 161,687 anesthetics given over 14 years. J Clin Anesth 2007, 19:339-345.
2. Warner M.E., Benenfeld S.M., Warner M.A., Schroeder D.R., Maxson P.M. Perianesthetic dental injuries: frequency, outcomes, and risk factors. Anesthesiology 1999, 90:1302-1305.
3. Lockhart P.B., Feldbau E.V., Gabel R.A., Connolly S.F., Silversin J.B. Dental complications during and after tracheal intubation. J Am Dent Assoc 1986, 112:480-543.
4. Adolphs N., Kessler B., von Heymann C., Achterberg E., Spies C., Menneking H., et al. Dentoalveolar injury related to general anaesthesia: a 14 years review and a statement from the surgical point of view based on a retrospective analysis of the documentation of a university hospital. Dent Traumatol 2011, 27:10-14.
5. Gaudio R.M., Barbieri S., Feltracco P., Tiano L., Galligioni H., Uberti M., et al. Traumatic dental injuries during anaesthesia. Part II: medico-legal evaluation and liability. Dent Traumatol 2011, 27:40-45.
6. Gaudio R.M., Feltracco P., Barbieri S., Tiano L., Alberti M., Delantone M., et al. Traumatic dental injuries during anaesthesia: part I: clinical evaluation [Case Reports]. Dent Traumatol 2010, 26:459-465.
7. Jordana F., Fronty Y., Colat-Parros J. Lésions iatrogènes dentomaxillaires en relation avec les actes pratiqués par les anesthésiologistes. Can J Anaesth 2009, 56:545-546.
8. Gerson C., Sicot C. Accidents dentaires en relation avec l'anesthésie générale. Expérience du groupe des assurances mutuelles médicales. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1997, 16:918-921.
9. Cook T.M., Scott S., Mihai R. Litigation related to airway and respiratory complications of anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995-2007. Anaesthesia 2010, 65:556-563.
10. Laidoowoo E., Baert O., Besnier E., Dureuil B. Lésions dentaires et anesthésie : épidémiologie et impact assurantiel sur quatre années au CHU de Rouen. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2012, 31:23-28.
11. Vogel J., Stubinger S., Kaufmann M., Krastl G., Filippi A. Dental injuries resulting from tracheal intubation - a retrospective study. Dent Traumatol 2009, 25:73-77.
12. Diemunsch P., Langeron O., Richard M., Lenfant F. Prédiction et définition de la ventilation au masque difficile et de l'intubation difficile : question 1. Société francaise d'anesthésie et de réanimation. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2008, 27:3-14.
13. Givol N., Gershtansky Y., Halamish-Shani T., Taicher S., Perel A., Segal E. Perianesthetic dental injuries: analysis of incident reports. J Clin Anesth 2004, 16:173-176.
14. Prunet B., Lacroix G., D'Aranda E., Cotte J., Kaiser E. Traumatisme dentaire lié à l'anesthésie générale : le laryngoscope n'est pas toujours coupable. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2010, 29:405-406.
15. Yasny J.S. Perioperative dental considerations for the anesthesiologist. Anesth Analg 2009, 108:1564-1573.
16. Monaca E., Fock N., Doehn M., Wappler F. The effectiveness of preformed tooth protectors during endotracheal intubation: an upper jaw model. Anesth Analg 2007, 105:1326-1332.
17. Brosnan C., Radford P. The effect of a toothguard on the difficulty of intubation. Anaesthesia 1997, 52:1011-1014.
18. Langeron O., Bourgain J.L., Laccoureye O., Legras A., Orliaguet G. Stratégies et algorithmes de prise en charge d'une difficulté de contrôle des voies aériennes : question 5. Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2008, 27:41-45.
19. Beaussier M., Raucoules-Aime M. Indications de la curarisation pour l'intubation trachéale. Chirurgie programmée, patients sans risque particulier lors de l'examen préanesthésique. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2000, 19 Suppl. 2:378s-386s.
20. Meistelman C., Ancel N. Indications de la curarisation pour l'intubation trachéale potentiellement difficile chez l'adulte. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2000, 19 Suppl. 2:387s-390s.
21. Bouillon T.W., Bruhn J., Radulescu L., Andresen C., Shafer T.J., Cohane C., et al. Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy. Anesthesiology 2004, 100:1353-1372.
22. Johnson K.B., Syroid N.D., Gupta D.K., Manyam S.C., Egan T.D., Huntington J., et al. An evaluation of remifentanil propofol response surfaces for loss of responsiveness, loss of response to surrogates of painful stimuli and laryngoscopy in patients undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Analg 2008, 106:471-479.
23. Kern S.E., Xie G., White J.L., Egan T.D. A response surface analysis of propofol-remifentanil pharmacodynamic interaction in volunteers. Anesthesiology 2004, 100:1373-1381.
24. Brain A.I. The laryngeal mask - a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983, 55:801-805.
25. McLure H.A. Dental damage to the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996, 51:1078-1079.
26. Newnam P.T. Dental damage to the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1997, 52:283.
27. TMin children. Br J Anaesth 2004, 93:528-531.
28. Lopez-Gil M., Brimacombe J., Alvarez M. Safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway. A prospective survey of 1400 children. Anaesthesia 1996, 51:969-972.
29. Ali A., Canturk S., Turkmen A., Turgut N., Altan A. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway classic in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009, 26:1010-1014.
30. Yu S.H., Beirne O.R. Laryngeal mask airways have a lower risk of airway complications compared with endotracheal intubation: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010, 68:2359-2376.
31. Brimacombe J., Keller C., Brimacombe L. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation. Anesth Analg 2002, 95:770-776.
32. Maharaj C.H., McDonnell J.G., Harte B.H., Laffey J.G. A comparison of direct and indirect laryngoscopes and the ILMA in novice users: a manikin study. Anaesthesia 2007, 62:1161-1166.
33. Ead H. Post-anesthesia tracheal extubation. Dynamics 2004, 15:20-25.
34. Vogel C. Dental injuries during general anaesthesia and their forensic consequences (author's transl.). Anaesthesist 1979, 28:347-349.
35. Ducommun P., Chikhani L., Ducommun C. Traumatismes dentaires et intubation : le point de vue de l'expert stomatologiste et l'analyse médicolégale. Recommandations pour les médecins anesthésistes. Prat Anesth Reanim 2005, 9:369-379.
36. Lee J., Choi J.H., Lee Y.K., Kim E.S., Kwon O.K., Hastings R.H. The Callander laryngoscope blade modification is associated with a decreased risk of dental contact. Can J Anaesth 2004, 51:181-184.
37. Isono S. Common practice and concepts in anesthesia: time for reassessment: is the sniffing position a " gold standard" for laryngoscopy?. Anesthesiology 2001, 95:825-827.
38. Greenland K.B. A proposed model for direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2008, 63:156-161.
39. Kitamura Y., Isono S., Suzuki N., Sato Y., Nishino T. Dynamic interaction of craniofacial structures during head positioning and direct laryngoscopy in anesthetized patients with and without difficult laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology 2007, 107:875-883.
40. Lee L., Weightman W.M. Laryngoscopy force in the sniffing position compared to the extension-extension position. Anaesthesia 2008, 63:375-378.
41. Bishop M.J., Harrington R.M., Tencer A.F. Force applied during tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1992, 74:411-414.
42. Bucx M.J., van Geel R.T., Wegener J.T., Robers C., Stijnen T. Does experience influence the forces exerted on maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy? A manikin study using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 1995, 42:144-149.
43. Bucx M.J., van der Vegt M.H., Snijders C.J., Stijnen T., Wesselink P.R. Transverse forces exerted on the maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy. Can J Anaesth 1996, 43:665-671.
44. Bucx M.J., Scheck P.A., Van Geel R.T., Den Ouden A.H., Niesing R. Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1992, 47:348-351.
45. Bucx M.J., van Geel R.T., Scheck P.A., Stijnen T., Erdmann W. Forces applied during laryngoscopy and their relationship with patient characteristics. Influence of height, weight, age, sex and presence of maxillary incisors. Anaesthesia 1992, 47:601-603.
46. Saghaei M., Safavi M.R. Prediction of prolonged laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2001, 56:1198-1201.
47. Bucx M.J., Snijders C.J., van Geel R.T., Robers C., van de Giessen H., Erdmann W., et al. Forces acting on the maxillary incisor teeth during laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 1994, 49:1064-1070.
48. Seow W.K., Brown J.P., Tudehope D.I., O'Callaghan M. Developmental defects in the primary dentition of low birth-weight infants: adverse effects of laryngoscopy and prolonged endotracheal intubation. Pediatr Dent 1984, 6:28-31.
49. Hohoff A., Rabe H., Ehmer U., Harms E. Palatal development of preterm and low birthweight infants compared to term infants - what do we know? Part 3: discussion and conclusion. Head Face Med 2005, 1:10.
50. Seow W.K., Perham S., Young W.G., Daley T. Dilaceration of a primary maxillary incisor associated with neonatal laryngoscopy. Pediatr Dent 1990, 12:321-324.
51. Bucx M.J., Snijders C.J., ven der Vegt M.H., Holstein J.D., Stijnen T. Reshaping the Macintosh blade using biomechanical modelling. A prospective comparative study in patients. Anaesthesia 1997, 52:662-667.
52. Kimberger O., Fischer L., Plank C., Mayer N. Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade. Can J Anaesth 2006, 53:595-601.
53. Marks R.R., Hancock R., Charters P. An analysis of laryngoscope blade shape and design: new criteria for laryngoscope evaluation. Can J Anaesth 1993, 40:262-270.
54. Asai T., Matsumoto S., Fujise K., Johmura S., Shingu K. Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades in 300 patients. Br J Anaesth 2003, 90:457-460.
55. Arino J.J., Velasco J.M., Gasco C., Lopez-Timoneda F. Straight blades improve visualization of the larynx while curved blades increase ease of intubation: a comparison of the Macintosh, Miller, McCoy, Belscope and Lee-Fiberview blades. Can J Anaesth 2003, 50:501-506.
56. Nelson S., Albert J.M., Lombardi G., Wishnek S., Asaad G., Kirchner H.L., et al. Dental caries and enamel defects in very low birth weight adolescents. Caries Res 2010, 44:509-518.
57. Maharaj C.H., Costello J.F., Harte B.H., Laffey J.G. Evaluation of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2008, 63:182-188.
58. Lee R.A., van Zundert A.A., Maassen R.L., Willems R.J., Beeke L.P., Schaaper J.N., et al. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors during video-assisted intubation. Anesth Analg 2009, 108:187-191.
59. Maassen R., Lee R., Hermans B., Marcus M., van Zundert A. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 2009, 109:1560-1565.
60. Henderson J.J., Suzuki A. Rigid indirect laryngoscope insertion techniques. Anaesthesia 2008, 63:323-324.
61. Pott L.M., Murray W.B. Review of video laryngoscopy and rigid fiberoptic laryngoscopy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008, 21:750-758.
62. Asai T., Liu E.H., Matsumoto S., Hirabayashi Y., Seo N., Suzuki A., et al. Use of the Pentax-AWS in 293 patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology 2009, 110:898-904.
63. Shippey B., Ray D., McKeown D. Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope - an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anaesth 2007, 54:307-313.
64. Savoldelli G.L., Schiffer E., Abegg C., Baeriswyl V., Clergue F., Waeber J.L. Comparison of the Glidescope, the McGrath, the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airways*. Anaesthesia 2008, 63:1358-1364.
65. Maassen R., Lee R., van Zundert A., Cooper R. The videolaryngoscope is less traumatic than the classic laryngoscope for a difficult airway in an obese patient. J Anesth 2009, 23:445-448.
66. Burton J.F., Baker A.B. Dental damage during anaesthesia and surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 1987, 15:262-268.