Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1010-1014

  Ali, Achmet ^a   Canturk, Selcuk ^a   Turkmen, Aygen ^a   Turgut, Namigar ^a   Altan, Aysel ^a  

^a SB Okmeydani Teaching and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cuff pressure; Insertion; Laryngeal mask airway classic; Laryngeal mask airway supreme

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGITATION; ARTICLE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; END TIDAL CARBON DIOXIDE TENSION; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY CLASSIC; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY SUPREME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SORE THROAT; ADOLESCENT; BLOOD; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEART RATE; INHALATION ANESTHESIA; INSTRUMENTATION; LUNG VENTILATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIDAL VOLUME;

ETHER DERIVATIVE; INHALATION ANESTHETIC AGENT; OXYGEN; SEVOFLURANE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; METHYL ETHERS; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; PULMONARY VENTILATION; TIDAL VOLUME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77249092779     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283313fdd     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask: a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55:801-805.
2. Smith I, Joshi G. The laryngeal mask airway for outpatient anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 1983; 5 (Suppl 1):S22-S28.
3. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme: a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:79-83.
4. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1989; 82:286-287.
5. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T,et al. Comparison of the LMA-Proseal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93:528-531.
6. Davies PR, Tighe SQ, Greenslade GL, Evans GH. Laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube insertion by unskilled personnel. Lancet 1980; 336:977-979.
7. McCrirrick A, Ramage DT, Pracilio JA, Hickman JA. Experience with the laryngeal mask airway in two hundred patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 1981; 19:256-260.
8. Timmermann A, Cremer S, Heuer J,et al. Laryngeal mask LMA Supreme. Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management. Anaesthesist 2008; 57:970-975.
9. Coulson A, Brimacombe J, Keller C,et al. A comparison of the ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airways for airway management by inexperienced personnel after manikin-only training. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003; 31:286-289.
10. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B,et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:289-295. (Pubitemid 34121735)
11. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:104-109. (Pubitemid 30436683)
12. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2003; 38:393-396. (Pubitemid 36753389)
13. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Laryngeal mask airway size selection in males and females: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, pharyngeal mucosal pressures and anatomical position. Br J Anaesth 1989; 82:703-707.
14. Martins RH, Braz JR, Defaveri J,et al. Effect of high laryngeal mask airway intracuff pressure on the laryngopharyngeal mucosa of dogs. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:645-650.
15. Sonoda S, Kugimiya T. Effects of cuff pressure on changes in airway morphology after use of the laryngeal mask airway. J Anesth 2003; 17:133-135.
16. Goldmann K, Dieterich J, Roessler M. Laryngopharyngeal mucosal injury after prolonged use of the ProSeal LMA in a porcine model: a pilot study.Can J Anaesth 2007; 54:822-828.
17. Kaya G, Koyuncu O, Turan N, Turan A. Comparison of the laryngeal mask (LMA) and laryngeal tube (LT) with the perilaryngeal airway (cobraPLA) in brief paediatric surgical procedures. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008; 36:425-430.
18. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Fick GH. Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs. tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth 2000; 47:622-626.
19. Braude N, Clements EA, Hodges UM, Andrews BP. The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison with tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1989; 44:551-554.
20. Wilson IG, Fell D, Robinson SL, Smith G. Cardiovascular responses to insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1982; 47:300-302.
21. Hollande J, Riou B, Guerrero M,et al. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of the laryngeal mask and the orotracheal tube. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1983; 12:372-375.
22. Rooke GO, Haridas RP, Rocke DA, Gouws E. Haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion in hypertensive patients. S Afr J Surg 1987; 35:24-26.
23. Cork RC, Depa RM, Standen JR. Prospective comparison of use of the laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube for ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1984; 79:719-727