The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: A systematic review

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 112, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1007-1015

  McDonagh, Marian S ^a   Osterweil, Patricia ^a   Guise, Jeanne Marie ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN; PROSTAGLANDIN E2; OXYTOCIC AGENT;

CESAREAN SECTION; CHILD DEATH; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COCHRANE LIBRARY; EMBASE; HUMAN; LABOR COMPLICATION; LABOR INDUCTION; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL CHILDBIRTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UTERUS RUPTURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DELIVERY; FEMALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK FACTOR; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TRIAL OF LABOR;

CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; CLINICAL TRIALS; DINOPROSTONE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; OXYTOCICS; OXYTOCIN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK FACTORS; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 24344502332     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00623.x     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Zhang J, Klebanoff MA, DerSimonian R. Epidural analgesia in association with duration of labor and mode of delivery: a quantitative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(4):970-977.
2. Thomas J, Paranjothy S. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
3. Curtin SC, Martin JA. Births: preliminary data for 1999. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2000;48(14):1-20.
4. Anonymous. Health Canada. Health Services Cesarean Section Rate. Canadian Perinatal Report 2000. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2000:19-33.
5. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345(1):3-8.
6. Wing DA, Lovett K, Paul RH. Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91(5 Pt 2):828-830.
7. Anonymous. Induction of Labour. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, 2001: 1-78.
8. Anonymous. ACOG Committee Opinion. Induction of Labor for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2002:679-680.
9. Guise J, McDonagh M, Hashima J, et al. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC). Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0018). Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publication, 2003.
10. Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Methods of the third U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med 2001;20(3S):21-35.
11. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research Effectiveness: CRD's Guidance for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. CRD Report Number 4, 2nd edition. York, England: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001.
12. Anonymous. Use of hospital discharge data to monitor uterine rupture-Massachusetts 1990-1997. Morb Mort Wkly Report 2000;49:245-258.
13. Weiss J, Nannini A, Bartlett L. Uterine rupture among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2002;346(2):134-137.
14. Slavin R. Best-evidence synthesis: an alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educ Res 1986;15:5-11.
15. 2 gel compared with expectant management in women with previous cesareans. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94(2):250-254.
16. Lelaidier C, Baton C, Benifla JL, Fernandez H, Bourget P, Frydman R. Mifepristone for labour induction after previous caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101(6):501-503.
17. Smith GCS, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA 2002;287(20):2684-2690.
18. 2 gel induction of patients with a prior low transverse cesarean section. Am J Perinatol 1992;9(2):80-83.
19. 2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(6 Pt I):1551-1559.
20. Cowan RK, Kinch RA, Ellis B, Anderson R. Trial of labor following cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83(6):933-936.
21. Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, Fallon D, Yoshida MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76(5 Pt 1):750-754.
22. Lao TT, Leung BFH. Labor induction for planned vaginal delivery in patients with previous cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987;66(5):413-416.
23. Meehan FP, Burke G. Trial of labour following prior section; a 5 year prospective study (1982-1987). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989;31(2):109-117.
24. Raynor BD. The experience with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a small rural community practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168(1 Pt 1):60-62.
25. Stovall TG, Shaver DC, Solomon SK, Anderson GD. Trial of labor in previous cesarean section patients, excluding classical cesarean sections. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70(5):713-717.
26. Paul RH, Phelan JP, Yeh SY. Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151(3):297-304.
27. 2 for cervical ripening: a Multicenter study of patients with prior cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol 1997;14(3):157-160.
28. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Fuelberth NJ, Fischermann E, Jones C, Hersh E. Oxytocin during labor after previous cesarean section: results of a multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70(5):709-712.
29. Plaut MM, Schwartz ML, Lubarsky SL, et al. Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(6 Pt I):1535-1542.
30. Guise J-M, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BKS, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004;329(7456):1-7.
31. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 271. Induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:679-680.