Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: A retrospective population-based cohort study

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 117, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1358-1365

  Dekker, G A ^a   Chan, A ^b   Luke, C G ^b   Priest, K ^b   Riley, M ^b   Halliday, J ^b   King, J F ^c   Gee, V ^d   O'Neill, M ^d   Snell, M ^e   Cull, V ^e   Cornes, S ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b Department of Health ^*  (Australia)

^c Department of Human Services ^*  (Australia)

^d Maternal and Child Health Unit   (United States)

^e Health Information Centre   (Australia)

^f Health Statistics Centre   (Australia)

Author keywords

Uterine rupture; vaginal birth after caesarean

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; PERINATAL PERIOD; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; OXYTOCICS; OXYTOCIN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 77956507250     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beckett VA, Regan L. Vaginal birth after cesarean: the European experience. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2001 44: 594 603.
2. Cragin EB. Conservatism in obstetrics. N Y Med J 1916 104: 1 3.
3. Gregory KD, Korst LM, Fridman M, Shihady I, Broussard P, Fink A, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 198: 452.
4. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004 351: 2581 2589.
5. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001 345: 3 8.
6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No 271. Induction of labour for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002 99: 679 680.
7. McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Guise J-M. The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patienet with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review. BJOG 2005 112: 1007 1015.
8. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. National vital statistics reports. Vol. 55, no 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2006.
9. Dodd JM, Crowther CA. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003 43: 226 231.
10. Brill Y, Kingdom J, Thomas J, Fraser W, Milne JK, Thomas M, et al. The management of VBAC at term: a survey of Canadian obstetricians. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003 25: 300 310.
11. AIHW NPSU 2003. Australia's mothers and babies 2000. AIHW Cat. No. PER 21. Canberra: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit (Perinatal Statistics Series no 12). [ http://www.npsu.unsw.edu.au ]. Accessed 25 September 2009.
12. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise J-M, Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004. Art. No.: CD004224. DOI:.
13. Dodd JM, Crowther CA. Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006. Art. No.: CD004906.DOI:.
14. Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 193: 1656 1662. (Pubitemid 41540462)
15. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996 335: 689 695.
16. Guise J-M, McDonagh MS, Osterwell P, Nygren P, Chan BKS, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004 329: 1 7.
17. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Bruinse HW. Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007 132: 171 176.
18. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999 181: 882 886. (Pubitemid 29503609)
19. Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000 183: 1176 1179.
20. Lieberman E. Risk factors for uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2001 44: 609 621. (Pubitemid 32751783)
21. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JIP, Bloemenkamp KWM, van Roosmalen J. Uterine rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG 2009 116: 1069 1080.
22. McLean A, Scott J, Keane RJ, Sage L, Chan A. Validation of the 1994 South Australian Perinatal Data Collection Form. Adelaide: Pregnancy Outcome Unit, South Australian Department of Human Services, 2001.
23. Gee V, Dawes V. Validation Study of the Western Australian Midwives' Notification System 1992. Perth, Western Australia: Health Department of Western Australia, 1994.
24. Vagg L, Taylor O, Riley M, Palma S, Halliday J. Validation of the Victorian Perinatal Morbidity Statistics form: new items, pre-coded text and free text. Health Inf Manag 1999-2000 29: 118 122.
25. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. Audit of ICD.9.CM Coded Clinical Data 1994/1995, Final Report and Addenda. Adelaide: South Australian Health Commission, 1997.