Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 97-105

  Knight, Marian ^a   Kurinczuk, Jennifer J ^a   Spark, Patsy ^a   Brocklehurst, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MULTIPARA; MYOMECTOMY; PLACENTAL DELIVERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERIUM; RISK FACTOR; TWIN PREGNANCY;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; INCIDENCE; MATERNAL MORTALITY; ODDS RATIO; PARITY; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY;

EID: 37549062976     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000296658.83240.6d     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Why mothers die 2000-2002. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2004.
2. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367:1066-74.
3. Hall M. Haemorrhage. In: Why mothers die 2000-2002. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2004. p. 86-93.
4. Pattinson RC, Hall M. Near misses: a useful adjunct to maternal death enquiries. Br Med Bull 2003;67:231-43.
5. Brace V, Penney G, Hall M. Quantifying severe maternal morbidity: a Scottish population study. BJOG 2004;111:481-4.
6. Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Gandaho T, Graham W, Alihonou E, Santos P. Women's reports of severe (near-miss) obstetric complications in Benin. Stud Fam Plann 2000;31:309-24.
7. Penney G., Adamson L., Kernaghan D. Scottish confidential audit of severe maternal morbidity. 2nd Annual Report 2004. Aberdeen (UK): Scottish Programme for Clinical Effectiveness in Reproductive Health; 2006. Available at: www.abdn.ac.uk/spcerh/publications/SCASSM%202004.pdf. Retrieved October 18, 2007.
8. Eniola OA, Bewley S, Waterstone M, Hooper R, Wolfe CD. Obstetric hysterectomy in a population of South East England. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;26:104-9.
9. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;124:187-92.
10. Selo-Ojeme DO, Bhattacharjee P, Izuwa-Njoku NF, Kadir RA. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary London hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005;271:154-9.
11. Kacmar J, Bhimani L, Boyd M, Shah-Hosseini R, Peipert J. Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:141-5.
12. Baskett TF. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;23:353-5.
13. NHS Maternity Statistics, England: 2004-5. Leeds (UK): The Information Centre for Health and Social Care; 2006. Available at: http://www.ic.nhs.uk/ statistics-and-data-collections/hospital-care/maternity/nhs-maternity- statistics-england-2004-05. Retrieved October 18, 2007.
14. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: cesarean delivery on maternal request, final statement 2006. Available at: http:// consensus.nih.gov/2006/2006CesareanSOS027Statementhtml.htm. Retrieved October 18, 2007.
15. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006;367:1819-29.
16. Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Tuffnell D, Brocklehurst P. The UK Obstetric Surveillance System for rare disorders of pregnancy. BJOG 2005;112:263-5.
17. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Caesarean section. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2004. Available at: http:// www.ncc-wch.org.uk/index.asp. Retrieved October 18, 2007.
18. Birth Statistics: review of the Registrar General on births and patterns of family building in England and Wales 2004. London (UK): Office for National Statistics; 2005.
19. Scotland's population 2004. Edinburgh (UK): General Register Office Scotland; 2005.
20. Registrar General Annual Report 2004. Belfast: Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency; 2005.
21. The National Statistics socio-economic classification user manual. London (UK): Office for National Statistics; 2004.
22. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Medical statistics. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing; 2003.
23. Penney G, Brace V. Scottish Confidential Audit of Severe Maternal Morbidity First Annual Report 2003. Aberdeen (UK): Scottish Programme for Clinical Effectiveness in Reproductive Health; 2005. Available at: www.abdn.ac.uk/spcerh/publications/Maternal%20Morbidity.pdf. Retrieved October 18, 2007.
24. Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Identifying risk factors for peripartum cesarean hysterectomy; a population-based study. J Reprod Med 2003;48:622-6.
25. Baskett TF, O'Connell CM. Severe obstetric maternal morbidity: a 15-year population-based study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:7-9.
26. Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks Schmahl FW. Association between method of delivery, puerperal complication rate and postpartum hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005;272:43-7.
27. Whiteman MK, Kuklina E, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, Posner SF, et al. Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1486-92.
28. Population Trends 123. London (UK): Office for National Statistics; 2006. Available at: www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_population/PT123_V1.pdf. Retrieved October 18, 2007.