Short interpregnancy interval: Risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 110, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1075-1082

  Stamilio, David M ^a   Defranco, Emily ^b   Paré, Emmanuelle ^b   Odibo, Anthony O ^b   Peipert, Jeffrey F ^b   Allsworth, Jenifer E ^b   Stevens, Erika ^b   Macones, George A ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERY INJURY; ARTICLE; BLADDER INJURY; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; INTESTINE INJURY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED STATES; UTERINE ARTERY; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 35848949047     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a metaanalysis. JAMA 2006;295:1809-23.
2. Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 1999;340:589-94.
3. Zhu BP. Effect of interpregnancy interval on birth outcomes: findings from three recent U.S. studies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;89 suppl 1:S25-33.
4. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. BMJ 2000;321:1255-9.
5. Rousso D, Panidis D, Gkoutzioulis F, Kourtis A, Mavromatidis G, Kalahanis I. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on the health of mother and child. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;105:4-6.
6. Bujold E, Mehta SH, Bujold C, Gauthier RJ. Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1199-202.
7. Esposito MA, Menihan CA, Malee MP. Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a casecontrol study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1180-3.
8. Huang WH, Nakashima DK, Rumney PJ, Keegan KA Jr, Chan K. Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:41-4.
9. Rochelson B, Pagano M, Conetta L, Goldman B, Vohra N, Frey M, et al. Previous preterm cesarean delivery: identification of a new risk factor for uterine rupture in VBAC candidates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;18:339-42.
10. Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:175-7.
11. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:297-308.
12. Adams MM, Delaney KM, Stupp PW, McCarthy BJ, Rawlings JS. The relationship of interpregnancy interval to infant birth-weight and length of gestation among low-risk women, Georgia. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997;11 suppl 1:48-62.
13. Dicle O, Kucukler C, Pirnar T, Erata Y, Posaci C. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections. Eur Radiol 1997;7:31-4.
14. Herring M, Baughman S, Glover J, Kesler K, Jesseph J, Campbell J, et al. Endothelial seeding of Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene grafts: the cellular events of healing. Surgery 1984;96:745-55.
15. Mareeva LS, Levashova II, Mil'man DB. Evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar after cesarean section [in Russian]. Akush Ginekol (Mosk) 1989;3:37-8.
16. Schwarz OH, Paddock R, Bortnick AR. The cesarean scar: an experimental study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1938;36:962-74.
17. Wojdecki J, Grynsztajn A. Scar formation in the uterus after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;107:322-4.
18. Macones GA, Cahill A, Pare E, Stamilio DM, Ratcliffe S, Stevens E, et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1223-9.
19. Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1656-62.
20. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 1st ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
21. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 1997;16:965-80.
22. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM, Norton MH, Rosas-Bermudez A. Effect of the interpregnancy interval on perinatal outcomes in Latin America. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:359-66.
23. Zhu BP, Haines KM, Le T, McGrath-Miller K, Boulton ML. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes among white and black women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1403-10.
24. Zhu BP, Le T. Effect of interpregnancy interval on infant low birth weight: a retrospective cohort study using the Michigan Maternally Linked Birth Database. Matern Child Health J 2003;7:169-78.
25. Khoshnood B, Lee KS, Wall S, Hsieh HL, Mittendorf R. Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:798-805.